Background: Horner's syndrome is comprised of a set of symptoms caused by a permanent or transient ipsilateral sympathetic trunk lesion or paralysis. It may occur after numerous pathologies in the cervical region, epidural, spinal anaesthesia, and interscalene, transscalene, supraclavicular, or infraclavicular brachial plexus block. The aim of this randomised, prospective clinical study was to evaluate the effect of the interscalene brachial plexus block (IBPB) technique on the occurrence rate of Horner's syndrome and identify contributing risk factors. Methods: 108 randomly selected patients of ASA I-III status were scheduled for elective shoulder arthroscopy. The patients received 20 mL of 0.5% ropivacaine either with ultrasound (US)-guided IBPB (U), peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS)-confirmation IBPB (N), or US-guided, PNS-confirmed IBPB (dual guidance; NU). Results: We observed that Horner's syndrome developed in 12% of the N group, 6% of the NU group, and 9% of the U group. The differences in the rates were not statistically significant (P = 0.616). Regardless of the technique used to induce IBPB, our study did not demonstrate any particular anthropometric parameter that predisposed the patients to the development of Horner's syndrome. Interestingly, our results showed that NU patients with Horner's syndrome were significantly younger than NU patients without Horner's syndrome. Conclusion: The precision of IBPB by use of the dual guidance technique may reduce the rate of Horner's syndrome. The higher water concentration in the prevertebral spaces of younger patients may create better conditions for the diffusion of ropivacaine, which may result in a statistically significant higher HS rate. Background: Horner's syndrome is comprised of a set of symptoms caused by a permanent or transient ipsilateral sympathetic trunk lesion or paralysis. It may occur after numerous pathologies in the cervical region, epidural, spinal anaesthesia, and interscalene, transscalene, supraclavicular, or infraclavicular brachial plexus block. The aim of this randomised, prospective clinical study was to evaluate the effect of the interscalene brachial plexus block (IBPB) technique on the occurrence rate of Horner's syndrome and identify contributing risk factors. Methods: 108 randomly selected patients of ASA I-III status were scheduled for elective shoulder arthroscopy. The patients received 20 mL of 0.5% ropivacaine either with ultrasound (US)-guided IBPB (U), peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS)-confirmation IBPB (N), or US-guided, PNS-confirmed IBPB (dual guidance; NU). Results: We observed that Horner's syndrome developed in 12% of the N group, 6% of the NU group, and 9% of the U group. The differences in the rates were not statistically significant (P = 0.616). Regardless of the technique used to induce IBPB, our study did not demonstrate any particular anthropometric parameter that predisposed the patients to the development of Horner's syndrome. Interestingly, our results showed that NU patients with Horner's syndrome were significantly younger than NU patients without Horner's syndrome. Conclusion: The precision of IBPB by use of the dual guidance technique may reduce the rate of Horner's syndrome. The higher water concentration in the prevertebral spaces of younger patients may create better conditions for the diffusion of ropivacaine, which may result in a statistically significant higher HS rate.

Background and Objectives: Although vitreoretinal surgery (VRS) is most commonly performed under regional anaesthesia (RA), in patients who might be unable to cooperate during prolonged procedures, general anaesthesia (GA) with intraprocedural use of opioid analgesics (OA) might be worth considering. It seems that the surgical pleth index (SPI) can be used to optimise the intraprocedural titration of OA, which improves haemodynamic stability. Preventive analgesia (PA) is combined with GA to minimise intraprocedural OA administration. Materials and Methods: We evaluated the benefit of PA combined with GA using SPI-guided fentanyl (FNT) administration on the incidences of PIPP (postprocedural intolerable pain perception) and haemodynamic instability in patients undergoing VRS (p < 0.05). We randomly assigned 176 patients undergoing VRS to receive GA with SPI-guided FNT administration alone (GA group) or with preventive topical 2% proparacaine (topical anaesthesia (TA) group), a preprocedural peribulbar block (PBB) using 0.5% bupivacaine with 2% lidocaine (PBB group), or a preprocedural intravenous infusion of 1.0 g of metamizole (M group) or 1.0 g of paracetamol (P group). Results: Preventive PBB reduced the intraprocedural FNT requirement without influencing periprocedural outcomes (p < 0.05). Intraprocedural SPI-guided FNT administration during GA resulted in PIPP in 13.5% of patients undergoing VRS and blunted the periprocedural effects of preventive intravenous and regional analgesia with respect to PIPP and haemodynamic instability. Conclusions: SPI-guided FNT administration during GA eliminated the benefits of preventive analgesia in the PBB, TA, M, and P groups following VRS.

BACKGROUND: Interscalene brachial plexus block is an effective regional anesthesia technique for shoulder surgeries. The superiority of the popular ultrasound-guided blocks over peripheral nerve stimulator-confirmed blocks remains unclear. In this study the efficacy of these different block techniques was compared. METHODS: This prospective, randomized, clinical study included 109 patients (ASA grades I–III) who receive 20 mL 0.5% ropivacaine with ultrasound-guided blocks (U group), peripheral nerve stimulator-confirmed blocks (N group), or ultrasound-guided and peripheral nerve stimulator-confirmed blocks (dual guidance; NU group) for elective shoulder arthroscopy. Block onset time, duration, and effectiveness on the Lovett rating scale were assessed. RESULTS: There was no statistically significant intergroup difference in duration of block performance, irrespective of the technique (P = 0.232). Onset time of complete warmth sensation loss (P < 0.001) and muscle strength abolition (P < 0.001) was significantly longer and mean Lovett rating scale score distribution was significantly higher in the N group than in the other groups (P < 0.001). These findings show a statistically significant correlation between the performance of the used block technique and the necessity of conversion to general anesthesia because of insufficient block in the N group (58.54%) than in the U (24.44%) and NU (19.57%) groups. CONCLUSIONS: Peripheral nerve stimulator-confirmed needle placement is not necessary to ensure effectiveness of ultrasound-guided blocks, which is expressed as a lack of necessity of conversion to general anesthesia. Nevertheless, the dual guidance technique is recommended to reduce the risk of complications and might be considered the regional anesthesia of choice for shoulder surgery. BACKGROUND: Interscalene brachial plexus block is an effective regional anesthesia technique for shoulder surgeries. The superiority of the popular ultrasound-guided blocks over peripheral nerve stimulator-confirmed blocks remains unclear. In this study the efficacy of these different block techniques was compared. METHODS: This prospective, randomized, clinical study included 109 patients (ASA grades I–III) who receive 20 mL 0.5% ropivacaine with ultrasound-guided blocks (U group), peripheral nerve stimulator-confirmed blocks (N group), or ultrasound-guided and peripheral nerve stimulator-confirmed blocks (dual guidance; NU group) for elective shoulder arthroscopy. Block onset time, duration, and effectiveness on the Lovett rating scale were assessed. RESULTS: There was no statistically significant intergroup difference in duration of block performance, irrespective of the technique (P = 0.232). Onset time of complete warmth sensation loss (P < 0.001) and muscle strength abolition (P < 0.001) was significantly longer and mean Lovett rating scale score distribution was significantly higher in the N group than in the other groups (P < 0.001). These findings show a statistically significant correlation between the performance of the used block technique and the necessity of conversion to general anesthesia because of insufficient block in the N group (58.54%) than in the U (24.44%) and NU (19.57%) groups. CONCLUSIONS: Peripheral nerve stimulator-confirmed needle placement is not necessary to ensure effectiveness of ultrasound-guided blocks, which is expressed as a lack of necessity of conversion to general anesthesia. Nevertheless, the dual guidance technique is recommended to reduce the risk of complications and might be considered the regional anesthesia of choice for shoulder surgery.

BACKGROUND: Shoulder arthroscopic procedures impose a challenge to anaesthesiologists in terms of postoperative analgesia. Proper pain management after arthroscopic procedures improves patient satisfaction and facilitates early rehabilitation. METHODS: We performed a randomized, prospective clinical study to assess the influence of anthropometric parameters and IBPB technique on the quality of postoperative analgesia. A total of 106 randomly selected patients of ASA I–III status scheduled for elective shoulder arthroscopy. Reasons for exclusion were neurological deficit in the upper arm, allergies to amide-type local anesthetics, coagulopathy, and pregnancy.The patients received 20 mL of 0.5% ropivacaine for an ultrasound-guided interscalene brachial plexus block (IBPB) (group U), peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS)-confirmed IBPB (group N), or ultrasound-guided, PNS-confirmed IBPB (dual guidance; group NU). RESULTS: We observed that the three groups did not differ in mean time of sensory and motor block terminations. In individual cases in each group, sensory block lasted up to 890–990 minutes, providing satisfactory long lasting postoperative analgesia in patients receiving IBPB. We observed a negative correlation between body mass index and termination of motor block (P = 0.037, Pearson’s correlation coefficient) and a positive correlation between age and termination of sensory block (P = 0.0314, Pearson’s correlation coefficient) in group U compared to the other two groups. We found a positive correlation between male gender and termination of motor block (P = 0.0487, Pearson’s correlation coefficient) in group N compared to the other two groups. CONCLUSION: In our study, patients received satisfactory analgesia in the postoperative period regardless of technique used, age, gender, or potentially uncommon anthropometry. BACKGROUND: Shoulder arthroscopic procedures impose a challenge to anaesthesiologists in terms of postoperative analgesia. Proper pain management after arthroscopic procedures improves patient satisfaction and facilitates early rehabilitation. METHODS: We performed a randomized, prospective clinical study to assess the influence of anthropometric parameters and IBPB technique on the quality of postoperative analgesia. A total of 106 randomly selected patients of ASA I–III status scheduled for elective shoulder arthroscopy. Reasons for exclusion were neurological deficit in the upper arm, allergies to amide-type local anesthetics, coagulopathy, and pregnancy.The patients received 20 mL of 0.5% ropivacaine for an ultrasound-guided interscalene brachial plexus block (IBPB) (group U), peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS)-confirmed IBPB (group N), or ultrasound-guided, PNS-confirmed IBPB (dual guidance; group NU). RESULTS: We observed that the three groups did not differ in mean time of sensory and motor block terminations. In individual cases in each group, sensory block lasted up to 890–990 minutes, providing satisfactory long lasting postoperative analgesia in patients receiving IBPB. We observed a negative correlation between body mass index and termination of motor block (P = 0.037, Pearson’s correlation coefficient) and a positive correlation between age and termination of sensory block (P = 0.0314, Pearson’s correlation coefficient) in group U compared to the other two groups. We found a positive correlation between male gender and termination of motor block (P = 0.0487, Pearson’s correlation coefficient) in group N compared to the other two groups. CONCLUSION: In our study, patients received satisfactory analgesia in the postoperative period regardless of technique used, age, gender, or potentially uncommon anthropometry.

Background: The aim of the study was to assess the influence of volatile induction of general anaesthesia with sevoflurane using two different techniques and intravenous anaesthesia with propofol on the possible presence of epileptiform electroencephalograph patterns during the induction of general anaesthesia. Methods: Sixty patients (age 18-70 years) were recruited. Exclusion criteria included history of epilepsy, neurological or neurosurgical diseases, pre-existing EPs in initial EEG recordings, medication interfering with EEG patterns. Patients were randomly allocated into three different groups: A (sevoflurane, increasing concentrations technique); B (sevoflurane, vital capacity technique); C (intravenous propofol). The clinical and instrumental monitoring included arterial blood pressure, heart rate, standard electrocardiography II, arterial oxygen saturation, facial electromyography, fraction of inspired sevoflurane, fraction of expired sevoflurane, minimal alveolar concentration of sevoflurane, and BIS. Results: Neurophysiological analysis of EEGs showed different EPs: polyspikes (PS), rhythmic polyspikes (PSR), and periodic epileptiform discharges (PED). EPs (p < 0.05) were observed in Group A (56%) and Group B (37%), but not in Group C. One patient in group B presented with clinical seizures. No significant differences in the vital parameters and anaesthesia parameters between groups was observed, regardless of the presence of EPs, which were associated with both low and more likely high (falsely indicating awakening from anaesthesia) BIS scores. Conclusion: Our study shows that the BIS score variations do not detect epileptiform activity, which was associated with both low and high scores. The sevoflurane concentration reached either sedative or toxic concentrations. Background: The aim of the study was to assess the influence of volatile induction of general anaesthesia with sevoflurane using two different techniques and intravenous anaesthesia with propofol on the possible presence of epileptiform electroencephalograph patterns during the induction of general anaesthesia. Methods: Sixty patients (age 18-70 years) were recruited. Exclusion criteria included history of epilepsy, neurological or neurosurgical diseases, pre-existing EPs in initial EEG recordings, medication interfering with EEG patterns. Patients were randomly allocated into three different groups: A (sevoflurane, increasing concentrations technique); B (sevoflurane, vital capacity technique); C (intravenous propofol). The clinical and instrumental monitoring included arterial blood pressure, heart rate, standard electrocardiography II, arterial oxygen saturation, facial electromyography, fraction of inspired sevoflurane, fraction of expired sevoflurane, minimal alveolar concentration of sevoflurane, and BIS. Results: Neurophysiological analysis of EEGs showed different EPs: polyspikes (PS), rhythmic polyspikes (PSR), and periodic epileptiform discharges (PED). EPs (p < 0.05) were observed in Group A (56%) and Group B (37%), but not in Group C. One patient in group B presented with clinical seizures. No significant differences in the vital parameters and anaesthesia parameters between groups was observed, regardless of the presence of EPs, which were associated with both low and more likely high (falsely indicating awakening from anaesthesia) BIS scores. Conclusion: Our study shows that the BIS score variations do not detect epileptiform activity, which was associated with both low and high scores. The sevoflurane concentration reached either sedative or toxic concentrations.