Malay Shah

Mr. Malay Shah

Lead system Designer
+1
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

13Years (2014-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
16 August 2018 in PLOS ONE
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JJJayaraj Joseph
Jayaraj Joseph
NMNabeel P M
Nabeel P M
MSMalay Shah
Malay Shah
MSMohanasankar Sivaprakasam
Mohanasankar Sivaprakasam
Assessment of local arterial properties has become increasingly important in cardiovascular research as well as in clinical domains. Vascular wall stiffness indices are related to local pulse pressure (ΔP) level, mechanical and geometrical characteristics of the arterial vessel. Non-invasive evaluation of local ΔP from the central arteries (aorta and carotid) is not straightforward in a non-specialist clinical setting. In this work, we present a method and system for real-time and beat-by-beat evaluation of local ΔP from superficial arteries—a non-invasive, cuffless and calibration-free technique. The proposed technique uses a bi-modal arterial compliance probe which consisted of two identical magnetic plethysmograph (MPG) sensors located at 23 mm distance apart and a single-element ultrasound transducer. Simultaneously measured local pulse wave velocity (PWV) and arterial dimensions were used in a mathematical model for calibration-free evaluation of local ΔP. The proposed approach was initially verified using an arterial flow phantom, with invasive pressure catheter as the reference device. The developed porotype device was validated on 22 normotensive human subjects (age = 24.5 ± 4 years). Two independent measurements of local ΔP from the carotid artery were made during physically relaxed and post-exercise condition. Phantom-based verification study yielded a correlation coefficient (r) of 0.93 (p < 0.001) for estimated ΔP versus reference brachial ΔP, with a non-significant bias and standard deviation of error equal to 1.11 mmHg and ±1.97 mmHg respectively. The ability of the developed system to acquire high-fidelity waveforms (dual MPG signals and ultrasound echoes from proximal and distal arterial walls) from the carotid artery was demonstrated by the in-vivo validation study. The group average beat-to-beat variation in measured carotid local PWV, arterial diameter parameters—distension and end-diastolic diameter, and local ΔP were 4.2%, 2.6%, 3.3%, and 10.2% respectively in physically relaxed condition. Consistent with the physiological phenomenon, local ΔP measured from the carotid artery of young populations was, on an average, 22 mmHg lower than the reference ΔP obtained from the brachial artery. Like the reference brachial blood pressure (BP) monitor, the developed prototype device reliably captured variations in carotid local ΔP induced by an external intervention. This technique could provide a direct measurement of local PWV, arterial dimensions, and a calibration-free estimate of beat-by-beat local ΔP. It can be potentially extended for calibration-free cuffless BP measurement and non-invasive characterization of central arteries with locally estimated biomechanical properties.

24 February 2020 in Biomedical Physics & Engineering Express
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JJJayaraj Joseph
Jayaraj Joseph
RKRaj Kiran
Raj Kiran
PNP M Nabeel
P M Nabeel
MSMalay Shah
Malay Shah
ABArun Bhaskar
Arun Bhaskar
MSMohanasankar Sivaprakasam
Mohanasankar Sivaprakasam
Objective : The conventional medical imaging modalities used for arterial stiffness measurement are non-scalable and unviable for field-level vascular screening. The need for an affordable, easy-to-operate automated non-invasive technologies remains unmet. To address this need, we present a portable image-free ultrasound device—ARTSENS ® Pen, that uses a single-element ultrasound transducer for carotid stiffness evaluation. Approach: The performance of the device was clinically validated on a cohort of 523 subjects. A clinical-grade B-mode ultrasound imaging system (ALOKA eTracking) was used as the reference. Carotid stiffness measurements were taken using the ARTSENS ® Pen in sitting posture emulating field scenarios. Main results: A statistically significant correlation (r > 0.80, p < 0.0001) with a non-significant bias was observed between the measurements obtained from the two devices. The ARTSENS ® Pen device could perform highly repeatable measurements (with variation smaller than 10%) on a relatively larger percentage of the population when compared to the ALOKA system. The study results also revealed the sensitivity of ARTSENS ® Pen to detect changes in arterial stiffness with age. Significance: The easy-to-use technology and the automated algorithms of the ARTSENS ® Pen make it suitable for cardiovascular risk assessment in resource-constrained settings.

3 December 2020 in IEEE Journal of Translational Engineering in Health and Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
JJJoseph Jayaraj
Joseph Jayaraj
PNP. M. Nabeel
P. M. Nabeel
SRSudha Ramachandra Rao
Sudha Ramachandra Rao
RVRamachandran Venkatachalam
Ramachandran Venkatachalam
MSMalay Shah
Malay Shah
PKPrabhdeep Kaur
Prabhdeep Kaur
Objective: We investigate the field feasibility of carotid stiffness measurement using ARTSENS® Touch and report the first community-level data from India. Method: In an analytical cross-sectional survey among 1074 adults, we measured specific stiffness index (β), pressure-strain elastic modulus (Ep), arterial compliance (AC), and one-point pulse wave velocity (PWVβ) from the left common carotid artery. Data for established risk factors (waist circumference, blood pressure, plasma glucose, triglycerides, and HDL-C) were also collected. The association of carotid stiffness with age, gender, hypertension/diabetes, smoking, and clustering of risk factors was studied. Results: Measurements were repeatable with a relative difference (RD) between consecutive readings of < 5% for blood pressure and < 15% for ~80% of arterial diameter values. The average RDs for β, Ep, AC, and PWVβ, were 20.51%, 22.31%, 25.10%, and 14.13%, respectively. Typical range for stiffness indices among females and males were β: 8.12 ± 3.59 vs 6.51 ± 2.78, Ep: 113.24 ± 56.12 kPa vs 92.33 ± 40.65 kPa, PWVβ: 6.32 ± 1.38 ms-1 vs 5.81 ± 1.16 ms-1, and AC: 0.54 ± 0.36 mm2kPa-1 vs 0.72 ± 0.38 mm2kPa-1. Mean β, Ep, and PWVβ increased (and mean AC decreased) across decades of age; the trend persisted even after excluding hypertensives and subjects with diabetes. The odds ratio of presence of multiple risk factors for Ep ≥ 93.71 kPa and/or PWVβ ≥ 6.56 ms-1 was 2.12 or above in males. In females, it was just above 2.00 for Ep ≥ 91.21 kPa and/or PWVβ ≥ 5.10 ms-1 and increased to ≥ 3.33 for Ep ≥ 143.50 kPa and ≥ 3.25 for PWVβ ≥ 7.31 ms-1. Conclusion: The study demonstrated the feasibility of carotid stiffness measurement in a community setting. A positive association between the risk factors and carotid artery stiffness provides evidence for the device’s use in resource-constrained settings. Clinical Impact: The device paves the way for epidemiological and clinical studies that are essential for establishing population-level nomograms for wide-spread use of carotid stiffness in clinical practice and field screening of ‘at-risk’ subjects.

3 May 2021 in Sensors
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Satheesh NatarajanSatheesh Natarajan
Satheesh Natarajan
Maria C. DeRosaMaria C. DeRosa
Maria C. DeRosa
MSMalay Shah
Malay Shah
JJJoseph Jayaraj
Joseph Jayaraj
The diagnosis, prognosis, and control of chronic kidney disease rely on an understanding of the glomerular filtration rate (GFR). The renal clearance of the cystatin-C is closely associated with the GFR. Cystatin-C is a more suitable GFR marker than the commonly used creatinine. General techniques for cystatin-C calculation, such as particle-enhanced turbidimetric and nephelometric assay, are time-consuming and tedious. Here, we propose a rapid, quantitative immunoassay for the detection of cystatin-C. A fluorescence-based lateral-flow kit was developed in a sandwich format by using a monoclonal antibody. A Linear calibration was obtained over the clinical diagnostic range of 0.023–32 µg/mL and the limit of detection (LOD) was 0.023 µg/mL and the limit of quantification (LOQ) was 0.029 µg/mL. Average recoveries from spiked urine samples ranged from 96–100% and the coefficient of variation was less than 4% for both intra and inter-day assays with excellent repeatability. With the comparison with an ELISA kit, the developed kit is highly sensitive, performs well over the detection range, provides repeatable results in a short time, and can easily be used at point-of-care (POC), making it an ideal candidate for rapid testing in early detection, community screening for renal function disorders.

3 September 2019 in The Analyst
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Satheesh NatarajanSatheesh Natarajan
Satheesh Natarajan
FSFengmei Su
Fengmei Su
JJJoseph Jayaraj
Joseph Jayaraj
MSMalay Shah
Malay Shah
YHYouju Huang
Youju Huang
In the emergency diagnosis of patients, acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is always time-consuming to diagnose, and the process requires multiple laboratory procedures, expensive equipment and skilled workers. Herein, we developed an easy-to-use, low-cost and portable fluorescent lateral flow immunoassay based on paper microfluidics for the point-of-care diagnostics of non-communicable diseases. The fluorescent lateral flow immunoassay can produce results in less than 10 minutes, and the limit of detection (LOD) is 0.019 ng ml−1. The slope was linear from 0 to 100 ng ml−1; the equation is y = 0.0342e2.1181x and R2 = 0.9618, which are distinctive features that ensure maximum amplification of the signal and recording of quantitative values by an analyser. The detection sensitivity showed an exceptional increase to 0.01 ng ml−1. Compared with conventional bioassay readers, our analyser shows some advantages to easily, clearly and effectively read data. The present point-of-care test for cardiac troponin I decreases the turnaround time and has a high coefficient of variation even at lower concentrations of troponin. So, the development of lateral flow assay-based point-of-care assays with higher analytical performance for real world samples can decrease the rule-out time for AMI in emergency departments and other fields.

11 March 2015 in IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Circuits and Systems
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ASAshish Kumar Sahani
Ashish Kumar Sahani
MSMalay Shah
Malay Shah
RRRavikumar Radhakrishnan
Ravikumar Radhakrishnan
JJJayaraj Joseph
Jayaraj Joseph
MSMohanasankar Sivaprakasam
Mohanasankar Sivaprakasam
Arterial stiffness (AS) has been shown to be an important marker for risk assessment of cardiovascular events. Local arterial stiffness (LAS) is conventionally measured by evaluating arterial distensibility at particular arterial sites through ultrasound imaging systems. Regional arterial stiffness (RAS) is generally obtained by evaluating carotid to femoral pulse wave velocity (cfPWV) through tonometric devices. RAS has a better prognostic value than LAS and cfPWV is considered as the gold standard of AS. Over the past few years our group has been developing ARTerial Stiffness Evaluation for Non-Invasive Screening (ARTSENS), an inexpensive and portable device to measure the LAS. It uses a single element ultrasound transducer to obtain A-Mode frames from the desired artery and is fully automated to enable a non-expert to perform measurements. In this work, we report an extension of ARTSENS to enable measurement of cfPWV that now makes it the only fully automatic device that can measure both LAS and RAS. In this paper, we provide a general review of the ARTSENS and compare it with other state-of-the-art AS measurement systems. cfPWV measurement using ARTSENS was cross-validated against SphygmoCor by successive measurements with both devices on 41 human subjects and excellent agreement between both devices was demonstrated (Coefficient of determination and, limits of agreement m/s). The inter-device correlation between ARTSENS and SphygmoCor was found to be better than other similar studies reported in the literature.