Organic polymers can be made porous via continuous or discontinuous expansion processes in scCO₂. The resulting foams properties are controlled by the interplay of three groups of parameters: (i) Chemical, (ii) physico-chemical, and (iii) technological/process that are explained in this paper. The advantages and drawbacks of continuous (extrusion, injection foaming) or discontinuous (batch foaming) foaming processes in scCO₂, will be discussed in this article; especially for micro or nano cellular polymers. Indeed, a challenge is to reduce both specific mass (e.g., ρ < 100 kg·m⁻³) and cell size (e.g., average pore diameter ϕ_average^pores < 100 nm). Then a particular system where small “objects” (coreshells CS, block copolymer MAM) are perfectly dispersed at a micrometric to nanometric scale in poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) will be presented. Such “additives”, considered as foaming aids, are aimed at “regulating” the foaming and lowering the pore size and/or density of PMMA based foams. Differences between these additives will be shown. Finally, in a PMMA/20 wt% MAM blend, via a quasi one-step batch foaming, a “porous to nonporous” transition is observed in thick samples. A lower limit of pore size (around 50 nm) seems to arise.

A strategy of CO₂‐assisted extrusion foaming of PMMA‐based materials was established to minimize both foam density and porosities dimension. First a highly CO₂‐philic block copolymer (MAM: PMMA‐PBA‐PMMA) was added in PMMA in order to improve CO₂ saturation before foaming. Then the extruding conditions were optimized to maximize CO₂ uptake and prevent coalescence. The extruding temperature reduction led to an increase of pressure in the barrel, favorable to cell size reduction. With the combination of material formulation and extruding strategy, very lightweight homogeneous foams with small porosities have been produced. Lightest PMMA micro foams (ρ = 0.06 g cm⁻³) are demonstrated with 7 wt% CO₂ at 130°C and lightest blend micro foams (ρ = 0.04 g cm⁻³) are obtained at lower temperature (110°C, 7.7 wt% CO₂). If MAM allows a reduction of T^foaming, it also allows a much better cell homogeneity, an increase in cell density (e.g., from 3.6 10⁷ cells cm⁻³ to 2 to 6 10⁸ cells cm⁻³) and an overall decrease in cell size (from 100 to 40 μm). These acrylic foams produced through scCO₂‐assisted extrusion has a much lower density than those ever produced in batch (ρ ≥ 0.2 g cm⁻³).

The two-step batch foaming process of solid-state assisted by supercritical CO₂ is a versatile technique for the foaming of polymers. In this work, it was assisted by an out-of-autoclave technology: either using lasers or ultrasound (US). Laser-aided foaming was only tested in the preliminary experiments; most of the work involved US. Foaming was carried out on bulk thick samples (PMMA). The effect of ultrasound on the cellular morphology was a function of the foaming temperature. Thanks to US, cell size was slightly decreased, cell density was increased, and interestingly, thermal conductivity was shown to decrease. The effect on the porosity was more remarkable at high temperatures. Both techniques provided micro porosity. This first investigation of these two potential methods for the assistance of supercritical CO₂ batch foaming opens the door to new investigations. The different properties of the ultrasound method and its effects will be studied in an upcoming publication.