Maria Monberg Feenstra

Ms. Maria Monberg Feenstra

orcid
RN, MScN, PhD fellow

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

9Years (2018-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 June 2018 in Sexual & Reproductive Healthcare
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
Maria Monberg FeenstraMaria Monberg Feenstra
Maria Monberg Feenstra
MKMette Jørgine Kirkeby
Mette Jørgine Kirkeby
MTMarienna Thygesen
Marienna Thygesen
DDDorthe B. Danbjørg
Dorthe B. Danbjørg
HKHanne Kronborg
Hanne Kronborg
Breastfeeding problems are common and associated with early cessation. Still length of postpartum hospital stay has been reduced. This leaves new mothers to establish breastfeeding at home with less support from health care professionals. The objective was to explore mothers' perspectives on when breastfeeding problems were the most challenging and prominent early postnatal. The aim was also to identify possible factors associated with the breastfeeding problems. In a cross-sectional study, a mixed method approach was used to analyse postal survey data from 1437 mothers with full term singleton infants. Content analysis was used to analyse mothers' open text descriptions of their most challenging breastfeeding problem. Multiple logistic regression was used to calculate odds ratios for early breastfeeding problems according to sociodemographic- and psychosocial factors. Up to 40% of the mothers had experienced early breastfeeding problems. The problems were associated with the mother, the infant and to lack of support from health care professionals. Most prominent problems were infant's inability to latch on (40%) and mothers having sore, wounded and cracked nipples (38%). Pain often occurred when experiencing breastfeeding problems. Factors associated with the problems were primiparity, lower self-efficacy and lower self-perceived knowledge of breastfeeding. Mothers with no or short education reported less frequently breastfeeding problems. Breastfeeding problems occurred frequently in the early postnatal period and often caused breastfeeding to be painful. Health care professionals should prepare mothers to deal with possible breastfeeding problems. New support options should be reviewed in an early postnatal discharge setting.

1 March 2018 in Sexual & Reproductive Healthcare
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
Maria Monberg FeenstraMaria Monberg Feenstra
Maria Monberg Feenstra
INIngrid Nilsson
Ingrid Nilsson
DDDorthe Boe Danbjørg
Dorthe Boe Danbjørg
The aim is to explore how new fathers experience early discharge after birth and readmission of their newborn in relation to their role and involvement as a father. Fathers of today are active participants during pregnancy, birth and in the care of the newborn. Still studies demonstrate that health care professionals are unsuccessful at involving fathers in ante- and postnatal care. How fathers experience their paternal role in the early postnatal period may affect the well-being of the new family. A qualitative study inspired by the hermeneutic approach. Data was collected through telephone interviews. The study was conducted in the Region of Southern Denmark in a University Hospital setting. Convenience sampling was applied. Eight fathers were included from November 2015 till February 2016 and six were interviewed. The data analysis revealed three categories: Early discharge - ups and downs, Readmission -waiting but being in good hands, and Practical guy in the shadow. Our study points at fathers being comfortable with being discharged early, but experienced insecurity when at home. The fathers experienced to be categorized by health care professionals as the practical guy, who had to assist the mother. Yet fathers saw themselves as equal to the mothers. Fathers also saw themselves in the shadow of the mother and showed greater considerations for the mother's feelings than their own. Fathers can be insecure in their paternal role when being met as just the practical guy.

9 October 2018 in Journal of Clinical Nursing
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Maria Monberg FeenstraMaria Monberg Feenstra
Maria Monberg Feenstra
INIngrid Nilsson
Ingrid Nilsson
DDDorthe Boe Danbjørg
Dorthe Boe Danbjørg

Maria Monberg FeenstraMaria Monberg Feenstra
Maria Monberg Feenstra
ASAnne Sidenius
Anne Sidenius
CNCharlotte Nielsen
Charlotte Nielsen
MRMartin Rudnicki
Martin Rudnicki
Background: Telemedicine may advance endometriosis care, but few initiatives are integrated in outpatient follow-up. A novel telemedicine approach—tele-patient-reported outcome measures (telePROM)—includes an endometriosis-specific questionnaire and phone and video consultations combined with text messaging (chat) with a multidisciplinary endometriosis team. This study explores how healthcare professionals experience telePROM and its integration in clinical practice. Methods: A qualitative study guided by interpretive description methodology. Data were generated through observations and focus group interviews conducted between January 2023 and March 2024 at a referral centre for endometriosis within a university hospital. A purposive sample of ten healthcare professionals comprising physicians, nurses and a medical secretary participated in the focus group interviews. Inductive analysis was inspired by interpretive description and carried out through an iterative process involving four steps, leading to the development of final themes and interpretation. Results: Three themes were identified from analysis: (1) Balancing Personalised Care With Increased Clinical Complexity; (2) Changing Professional Boundaries in a Digitally Supported Care Model; and (3) System Friction and Flexibility when Integrating TelePROM. Conclusions: Telemedicine improved endometriosis care by supporting patient-initiated and personalised consultations. However, sustainable, effective, and safe integration of telemedicine appears to require clinical experience, interdisciplinary collaboration, and supervision. Text communication (chat) proved to be an important element to ensure collection of additional information to complement patient-reported outcomes and it is essential for patient triage; yet it is rarely described in the literature. Ensuring organisational resilience during the digital transformation of healthcare requires ongoing training of healthcare professionals’ communicative and digital competences and may necessitate restructured technical support, including designated telemedicine experts in clinical practice to eliminate technical disruptions. These initiatives may contribute to and support the future implementation of telemedicine in healthcare.

1 February 2025 in Current Medical Research and Opinion
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
Maria Monberg FeenstraMaria Monberg Feenstra
Maria Monberg Feenstra
ASAnne Sidenius
Anne Sidenius
CNCharlotte Nielsen
Charlotte Nielsen
SKSimon Bang Kristensen
Simon Bang Kristensen
MRMartin Rudnicki
Martin Rudnicki
Patient-Reported Outcome (PRO) measures supported by a severity algorithm may serve as a decision aid for triage and consultation in follow-up of patients with endometriosis. In a new follow-up regime, patients filled out an endometriosis-specific questionnaire (EQ) at home before outpatient consultation (tele-Patient-Reported Outcome Measures; telePROM). A severity algorithm was assigned patients' answers using a color code thereby reflecting the need of clinical attention. Our study aimed to assess the test-retest reliability of the severity algorithm and of the single items as well as to evaluate the face- and content validity of the EQ. The study was carried out in a referral endometriosis clinic at a Danish University Hospital. The validation was based on an initial version of the EQ, which was adjusted simultaneously with its severity algorithm, to meet the purpose of this study. Reliability was assessed by a test-retest setting of the questionnaire including patients with endometriosis, ≥ 18 years and Danish speaking. Kappa statistics and interclass correlation analyses were applied to assess test-retest reliability. Face- and content validity was explored by focus group interviewing of patients. In total, 14 patients answered the questionnaire twice. Results indicate that the EQ demonstrated substantial reliability in three out of five domain indicators in the severity algorithm and 65% of items with kappa values above 0.60. Further, focus-group interview of five patients resulted in adding an open-ended question regarding important issues to discuss at the consultation. TelePROM in outpatient follow-up of endometriosis is feasible as patients viewed the questionnaire relevant for their clinical follow-up. Yet, due to the small sample size results should be interpreted with caution. Further validation of the EQ is recommended.