Tendon disorders represent a very common pathology in today’s population, and tendinopathies that account 30% of tendon-related injuries, affect yearly millions of people which in turn cause huge socioeconomic and health repercussions worldwide. Inflammation plays a prominent role in the development of tendon pathologies, and advances in understanding the underlying mechanisms during the inflammatory state have provided additional insights into its potential role in tendon disorders. Different cell compartments, in combination with secreted immune modulators, have shown to control and modulate the inflammatory response during tendinopathies. Stromal compartment represented by tenocytes has shown to display an important role in orchestrating the inflammatory response during tendon injuries due to the interplay they exhibit with the immune-sensing and infiltrating compartments, which belong to resident and recruited immune cells. The use of stem cells or their derived secretomes within the regenerative medicine field might represent synergic new therapeutical approaches that can be used to tune the reaction of immune cells within the damaged tissues. To this end, promising opportunities are headed to the stimulation of macrophages polarization towards anti-inflammatory phenotype together with the recruitment of stem cells, that possess immunomodulatory properties, able to infiltrate within the damaged tissues and improve tendinopathies resolution. Indeed, the comprehension of the interactions between tenocytes or stem cells with the immune cells might considerably modulate the immune reaction solving hence the inflammatory response and preventing fibrotic tissue formation. The purpose of this review is to compare the roles of distinct cell compartments during tendon homeostasis and injury. Furthermore, the role of immune cells in this field, as well as their interactions with stem cells and tenocytes during tendon regeneration, will be discussed to gain insights into new ways for dealing with tendinopathies.

Tendon injuries are at the frontier of innovative approaches to public health concerns and sectoral policy objectives. Indeed, these injuries remain difficult to manage due to tendon’s poor healing ability ascribable to a hypo-cellularity and low vascularity, leading to the formation of a fibrotic tissue affecting its functionality. Tissue engineering represents a promising solution for the regeneration of damaged tendons with the aim to stimulate tissue regeneration or to produce functional implantable biomaterials. However, any technological advancement must take into consideration the role of the immune system in tissue regeneration and the potential of biomaterial scaffolds to control the immune signaling, creating a pro-regenerative environment. In this context, immunoengineering has emerged as a new discipline, developing innovative strategies for tendon injuries. It aims at designing scaffolds, in combination with engineered bioactive molecules and/or stem cells, able to modulate the interaction between the transplanted biomaterial-scaffold and the host tissue allowing a pro-regenerative immune response, therefore hindering fibrosis occurrence at the injury site and guiding tendon regeneration. Thus, this review is aimed at giving an overview on the role exerted from different tissue engineering actors in leading immunoregeneration by crosstalking with stem and immune cells to generate new paradigms in designing regenerative medicine approaches for tendon injuries.

Tendon tissue engineering aims to develop effective implantable scaffolds, with ideally the native tissue’s characteristics, able to drive tissue regeneration. This research focused on fabricating tendon-like PLGA 3D biomimetic scaffolds with highly aligned fibers and verifying their influence on the biological potential of amniotic epithelial stem cells (AECs), in terms of tenodifferentiation and immunomodulation, with respect to fleeces. The produced 3D scaffolds better resemble native tendon tissue, both macroscopically, microscopically, and biomechanically. From a biological point of view, these constructs were able to instruct AECs genotypically and phenotypically. In fact, cells engineered on 3D scaffolds acquired an elongated tenocyte-like morphology; this was different from control AECs, which retained their polygonal morphology. The boosted AECs tenodifferentiation by 3D scaffolds was confirmed by the upregulation of tendon-related genes (SCX, COL1 and TNMD) and TNMD protein expression. The produced constructs also prompted AECs’ immunomodulatory potential, both at the gene and paracrine level. This enhanced immunomodulatory profile was confirmed by a greater stimulatory effect on THP-1-activated macrophages. These biological effects have been related to the mechanotransducer YAP activation evidenced by its nuclear translocation. Overall, these results support the biomimicry of PLGA 3D scaffolds, revealing that not only fiber alignment but also scaffold topology provide an in vitro favorable tenodifferentiative and immunomodulatory microenvironment for AECs that could potentially stimulate tendon regeneration.

Unsuccessful tendon healing leads to fibrosis and occasionally calcification. In these metaplastic drifts, the mouse AT preclinical injury model represents a robust experimental setting for studying tendon calcifications. Previously, calcium deposits were found in about 30% of tendons after 28 days post-injury. Although a neuromediated healing process has previously been documented, the expression patterns of NF200, NGF, NPY, GAL, and CGRP in mouse AT and their roles in metaplastic calcific repair remain to be explored. This study included a spatiotemporal analysis of these neuromarkers during the inflammatory phase (7 days p.i.) and the proliferative/early-remodelling phase (28 days p.i.). While the inflammatory phase is characterised by NF200 and CGRP upregulation, in the 28 days p.i., the non-calcified tendons (n = 16/24) showed overall NGF, NPY, GAL, and CGRP upregulation (compared to 7 days post-injury) and a return of NF200 expression to values similar to pre-injury. Presenting a different picture, in calcified tendons (n = 8), NF200 persisted at high levels, while NGF and NPY significantly increased, resulting in a higher NPY/CGRP ratio. Therefore, high levels of NF200 and imbalance between vasoconstrictive (NPY) and vasodilatory (CGRP) neuromarkers may be indicative of calcification. Tendon cells contributed to the synthesis of neuromarkers, suggesting that their neuro-autocrine/paracrine role is exerted by coordinating growth factors, cytokines, and neuropeptides. These findings offer insights into the neurobiological mechanisms of early tendon healing and identify new neuromarker profiles predictive of tendon healing outcomes.

Tendon injuries pose a clinical challenge due to tendons’ limited recovery. Emerging evidence points to the nervous system’s critical role in tendon healing, with neural markers NGF, NF-200, NPY, CGRP, and GAL modulating inflammation, cell proliferation, and extracellular matrix (ECM) remodeling. This study investigates the predictive role of selected neural markers in a validated ovine Achilles tendon injury model, comparing spatio-temporal expression patterns in regenerating tendons transplanted with amniotic epithelial stem cells (AECs) versus spontaneous healing (CTR) 14 and 28 days post-injury (p.i.). AEC-treated tissues showed a spatio-temporal modulation of NF-200, NGF, NPY, CGRP, GAL, and enhanced ECM remodeling, with greater cell alignment, lower angle deviation, and accelerated collagen maturation, with a favorable Collagen type 1 (COL1) to Collagen type 3 (COL3) ratio. Pearson’s matrix analysis revealed significant positive correlations between NGF, CGRP, and GAL expression, along a positive correlation between the three neural markers and cell alignment and angle deviation. As opposed to CTR, in AEC-treated tendons, lower levels of NGF, CGRP, and GAL correlated positively with improved tissue organization, suggesting these markers may predict successful tendon regeneration. The findings highlight the neuro-mediated activity of AECs in tendon regeneration, with NGF, CGRP, and GAL emerging as key predictive biomarkers for tendon healing.

MOVEMENT DATA ANALYSIS AS A NOVEL PREDICTIVE TECHNOLOGY FOR TENDON REPAIR