The Carboniferous coal seams in Northeast Kazakhstan remain insufficiently investigated, with a lack of comprehensive mineralogical and geochemical assessments necessary to understand the geological processes controlling coal quality. This study examines 15 coal samples from the Karagandy Coal Formation (KCF) at the Saradyr and Bogatyr mines using proximate and ultimate analyses, FTIR, XRD, SEM–EDS, ED-XRF, and ICP-OES, providing the first detailed comparison of mineralogical and geochemical characteristics—including depositional signals and inorganic constituent distribution—between these mines within the KCF. The coals exhibit an average ash yield of 24.1% on a dry basis, volatile matter of 21.6% on a dry and ash-free basis, and low moisture content of 1.1% (air-dry), with low sulfur levels of 0.7% in whole coal across both mines. Mineralogical composition is dominated by quartz and clay minerals, with minor pyrite, apatite, chalcopyrite, and rutile. Major oxides in the coal ash average 68.2% SiO₂ and 19.5% Al₂O₃, followed by Fe₂O₃, K₂O, and TiO₂ (3–12.1%). Among the 24 identified trace elements, Sm is the most abundant at 6.3 ppm with slight enrichment (CC = 2.8), Lu remains at normal levels (CC < 1), and most other elements are depleted (CC < 0.5). The Al₂O₃/TiO₂ ratios (3.8–10.8) indicate contributions from intermediate to mafic parent materials. The detrital mineralogy, parting compositions, and elevated ash content indicate significant accommodation space development during or shortly after peat accumulation, likely within a vegetated alluvial plain depression. These findings provide new insights into the depositional environment and coal-forming processes of the KCF and contribute to regional assessments of coal quality and resource potential.

Clay minerals in coal play a key role in controlling mineralogical composition, geochemical signatures, and the industrial behavior of coal and its combustion residues. This study investigates the occurrence, provenance, and potential applications of clay minerals in Carboniferous ash-rich coals from the Bogatyr, Lenin, and Saradyr coal mines in northeastern Kazakhstan. A total of 60 coal samples were analyzed using XRD, SEM–EDS/BSE, XRF, and ICP-OES following acid leaching. Based on ash yield, 52 samples were classified as coal (50% ash). Mineralogical assemblages show clear variability among the studied mines. Saradyr samples are strongly quartz-dominated with lower clay proportions, Bogatyr samples exhibit highly heterogeneous quartz–clay–mica assemblages, whereas Lenin samples are relatively more clay-rich and dominated by kaolinite and illite-group minerals. Across all samples, kaolinite is the dominant clay mineral (16.6–46 wt.%), occurring mainly as authigenic pore- and cell-filling aggregates. Minor phases include illite–muscovite (7.1–29.9 wt.%), illite–smectite (up to 7.6 wt.% in Bogatyr), and smectite–montmorillonite (0.4–0.7 wt.%). Clay minerals occur as discrete particles, coatings, and pore fillings, contributing to ash formation; however, their correlation with ash yield is weak (R = 0.03–0.05), reflecting heterogeneous mineral inputs and diagenetic overprinting. All geochemical data are reported on a high-temperature coal ash (HTA) basis (815 °C). Geochemical indices (CIA, CIW, CIX) and Al₂O₃/TiO₂ ratios (1.8–17.4) indicate variable provenance and moderate to high weathering intensity, reflecting mixed mafic to intermediate source rocks. A total of 23 trace elements were identified. Au occurs at trace levels (up to 0.02 ppm), while selected rare earth elements (REE: Ce, Dy, Eu, La, Nd, Sm, Y, Yb) average 0.2–0.3 ppm, indicating negligible economic recovery potential. REEs show a strong positive correlation with clay minerals (r = 0.93), indicating adsorption and minor structural incorporation. In contrast, Au correlates with As, V, Zn, Cu, Ni, and Nb, suggesting sulfide association. HTA is enriched in SiO₂–Al₂O₃ phases dominated by kaolinite and quartz, indicating strong potential for cement, geopolymer, ceramic, and zeolite applications.