High grade endometrioid endometrial cancer (HGEEC) is a heterogeneous group of tumors with unclear prognostic features. The aim of the present study is to evaluate the independent risk factors for recurrence and mortality and to describe the recurrence patterns of HGEEC. Ninety-six consecutive cases of HGEEC treated with primary surgery in a single Tertiary Center were retrospectively reviewed. Clinicopathological and treatment details were recorded, and all patients were closely followed up. Disease-free, overall and cancer-specific survival rates were 83.8%, 77.8% and 83.6%, respectively. Cervical stromal involvement was independently related to recurrence (HR = 25.67; 95%CI 2.95–223.30; p = 0.003) and cancer-related death (HR = 15.39; 95%CI 1.29–183.43; p = 0.031) after adjusting for other pathological and treatment variables. Recurrence rate was 16%, with 60% of these cases having lung metastases and only one case with single vaginal vault recurrence. 81.81% of the recurrences presented with symptoms and not a single recurrence was diagnosed in routine follow-up clinical examination. In conclusion, the recurrence pattern may suggest that patient-initiated follow-up (PIFU) could be considered a potential alternative to clinical-based follow-up for HGEEC survivors, especially for patients without cervical involvement and after two years from treatment. Additional caution is needed in patients with cervical stromal involvement.
Mixed endometrial carcinoma (MEEC) refers to rare endometrial tumours that are composed of two or more distinct histotypes, at least one of which is serous or clear cell. The aim of this study was to evaluate the epidemiology, treatment outcomes and survival rates of patients with mixed endometrial carcinoma. The medical records of 34 patients diagnosed with MEEC between March 2010 and January 2020 were reviewed retrospectively. Clinicopathological variables and treatment strategies were assessed, and overall survival and disease-free survival rates were evaluated. The histology of endometrioid and serous component was found in 26 (76.5%) patients, followed by serous and clear-cell components (5/34, 14.5%) and mixed endometrioid serous and clear-cell components (3/34, 8.8%). The median age at diagnosis was 70 years (range 52–84), and the median follow-up time was 55 months. The 5-year disease-free survival and the 5-year overall survival were 50.4% and 52.4%, respectively. Advanced disease stage was identified as an independent predictor of inferior disease-free (<0.003) and overall survival (p < 0.001). Except for stage, none of the traditional prognostic factors was associated with disease recurrence or death from disease. MEECs represent rare high-risk endometrial carcinomas with significant diagnostic and treatment challenges. Undoubtedly, the implementation of a molecular analysis can offer further diagnostic and management insights.
Fertility Sparing Surgery (FSS) appears to be a safe means of treating early-stage ovarian cancer based on relatively limited evidence. However, there is currently insufficient evidence to aid women in counselling about their potential fertility outcomes. The aim of this study was to assess the reproductive outcomes and prognosis of women who have undergone FSS for ovarian malignancy. Between 1 June 2008 and 1 June 2018, a retrospective review of a clinical database was conducted to identify all consecutive patients who underwent FSS in a central London gynaecological oncology centre. All patients with a histological diagnosis of ovarian malignancy (excluding borderline ovarian tumours) were eligible. All identified patients were then prospectively called into a follow up and asked to complete a questionnaire about their fertility outcomes. A total of 47 women underwent FSS; 36 were included in this study. The mean age was 30.3 years (95% Confidence Interval [CI]: 27.6 to 33.0 years). During the study period, 17/36 (47.2%) of the women had attempted to conceive following surgery, with a successful live birth rate of 52.9% (9/17). The mean time of recurrence was 125.3 months (95% CI: 106.5–144.1 months). The mean time to death was 139.5 months (95% CI: 124.3–154.8). The cancer grade, tumour stage and use of Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART) were the main factors significantly associated with the risk of recurrence and death. In conclusion, this study suggests that a large proportion of women will not attempt to conceive following FSS. For those who do attempt to conceive, the likelihood of achieving a live birth is high. However, careful counselling about the higher risk of recurrence and worse survival for women with high grade cancer, disease Stage > IA and potentially those who undergo ART is essential before contemplating FFS.
Background/Objectives: Uterine carcinosarcoma (UCS) refers to a rare high-grade aggressive epithelial non-endometrioid endometrial carcinoma, with tumour cells demonstrating epithelial–mesenchymal metaplastic transition and composed of both carcinomatous epithelial and sarcomatous (homologous or heterologous) components. Methods: The aim of this study was to evaluate the epidemiology, management approach, outcomes and survival patterns of patients with UCS. Seventy-seven cases of UCS treated with primary surgery in a single tertiary centre underwent retrospective cohort analysis across a ten-year period. Observational data on clinicopathological variables and treatment pathways were reviewed and independent risk factors for relapse and mortality were analysed. Results: The 5-year disease-free and overall survival rates were 52.10% and 46.6%, respectively. Cervical stromal involvement was independently related to disease-free survival (HR = 6.26; 95%CI 1.82–21.59; p = 0.004) and overall survival (HR = 3.64; 95%CI 1.42–9.38; p = 0.007), whilst sarcomatous component type was independently related to recurrence only (HR = 3.62; 95%CI 1.38–9.51; p = 0.009) after adjusting for other pathological and treatment variables. No significant difference in recurrence or mortality was found when comparing the performance of pelvic lymph node dissection (p = 0.803 and p = 0.192 respectively) or the administration of adjuvant treatment (p = 0.546 and p = 0.627 respectively). Conclusions: Whilst our data suggests an encouraging similarity in overall survival rates compared with the literature, UCS continues to represent significant treatment challenges—with a paucity of guidelines available. Data regarding molecular analysis was not systemically available in our cohort, the more recent introduction of which (alongside the revision of endometrial cancer staging) will undoubtedly provide UCS patients with improved therapeutic options in the future.
Background: Endometrial cancer (EC) is the most common tumour of the female reproductive system, and low-grade EC is the histological type with the best prognosis for its less aggressiveness. Abnormal uterine bleeding is one of the first symptoms that appears and that allows an early diagnosis, while the disease is still confined into the uterus. The objective of this study was to identify risk factors associated with recurrence in low-grade EC across International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) 2009 stages I to IV. Methods: This is a retrospective study that collected patients surgically treated at the Thames Valley Cancer Centre from March 2010 to January 2020 for low-grade EC. All cases were debated at the multidisciplinary team discussion, both prior to and following surgery, to decide the surgical approach and the need for adjuvant treatments. Clinical, surgical and histopathological data were gathered from electronic patient record and used for the statistical analysis. Results: A total of 238 patients were included. Overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and cancer-specific survival (CSS) were favourable, with follow-up nearing 10 years. However, 14 patients (5.88%) experienced recurrence, 11 of whom (78.5%) were initially diagnosed at stage I. The median time from surgery to relapse was 30 months. The vaginal vault was the most common site of recurrence (42%), followed by pelvic lymph nodes and distant metastases. Only myometrial invasion (P=0.049) and serosal involvement (P=0.01) were statistically significant predictors of recurrence in both univariate and multivariate analyses. Conclusions: This study confirms that deep myometrial invasion and serosal involvement are significant predictors of recurrence and poor outcomes in grade 1 EC. Other factors, such as lymphovascular space invasion and lymph node positivity, were not confirmed as significant. Before recommending adjuvant treatment for low-grade EC patients exhibiting these risk factors, further prospective trials are necessary.
Background: Although grade is a well-recognised prognostic factor for endometrioid endometrial cancer (EEC), in more studies grade 1 (G1) and grade 2 (G2) EEC are combined and compared together with grade 3 (G3) tumours. The aim of our study is to separately investigate the outcomes, prognostic factors and recurrence patterns of G2 EEC and whether the differentiation between G1 and G2 EEC is clinically useful. Methods: we retrospectively reviewed 523 patients with EEC treated with primary surgery over a decade (March 2010–January 2020) at Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust, focusing on those with G2 disease. Results: Patients with G2 EEC had worse 5-year cancer-specific survival (93.3% vs. 98.5%, p < 0.01) compared to patients with G1 EEC, but a favourable prognosis compared to G3 EEG, both in terms of disease-free survival (91.6 vs. 83.8%, p = 0.04) and cancer-specific survival (93.3% vs. 78.5%, p < 0.01). Both stage and grade are independent risk factors for cancer-specific mortality in EEC. Cervical stromal involvement, parametrial involvement and distant metastatic disease are all independent risk factors for cancer-related mortality in G2 ECC. Only 12.5% of recurrences of G2 EEC were diagnosed with examination in routine follow up in asymptomatic patients. Conclusions: our results suggest that the grading system should continue to differentiate G1 EEC and G2 EEC for better prognosis interpretation.
About Me
consultant of minimal access surgery and Endometriosis at Kingston and Richmond NHS foundation trust
consultant of minimal access surgery and Endometriosis at Kingston and Richmond NHS foundation trust