Floods are one of the most dangerous water-related risks. Numerous sources of uncertainty affect flood modeling. High-resolution land-cover maps along with appropriate Manning’s roughness values are the most significant parameters for building an accurate 2D flood model. Two land-cover datasets are available: the National Land Cover Database (NLCD 2019) and the Land Use/Land Cover for Environmental Systems Research Institute (LULC 2020-ESRI). The NLCD 2019 dataset has national coverage but includes references to Manning’s roughness values for each class obtained from earlier studies, in contrast to the LULC 2020-ESRI dataset, which has global coverage but without an identified reference to Manning’s roughness values yet. The main objectives of this study are to assess the accuracy of using the LULC 2020-ESRI dataset compared with the NLCD 2019 dataset and propose a standard reference to Manning’s roughness values for the classes in the LULC 2020-ESRI dataset. To achieve the research objectives, a confusion matrix using 548,117 test points in the conterminous United States was prepared to assess the accuracy by quantifying the cross-correspondence between the two datasets. Then statistical analyses were applied to the global maps to detect the appropriate Manning’s roughness values associated with the LULC 2020-ESRI map. Compared to the NLCD 2019 dataset, the proposed Manning’s roughness values for the LULC 2020-ESRI dataset were calibrated and validated using 2D flood modeling software (HEC-RAS V6.2) on nine randomly chosen catchments in the conterminous United States. This research’s main results show that the LULC 2020-ESRI dataset achieves an overall accuracy of 72% compared to the NLCD 2019 dataset. The findings demonstrate that, when determining the appropriate Manning’s roughness values for the LULC 2020-ESRI dataset, the weighted average technique performs better than the average method. The calibration and validation results of the proposed Manning’s roughness values show that the overall Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) in depth was 2.7 cm, and the Mean Absolute Error (MAE) in depth was 5.32 cm. The accuracy of the computed peak flow value using LULC 2020-ESRI was with an average error of 5.22% (2.0% min. to 8.8% max.) compared to the computed peak flow values using the NLCD 2019 dataset. Finally, a reference to Manning’s roughness values for the LULC 2020-ESRI dataset was developed to help use the globally available land-use/land-cover dataset to build 2D flood models with an acceptable accuracy worldwide.

Floods are among the most devastating natural disasters; predicting their depth and extent remains a global challenge. Machine Learning (ML) models have demonstrated improved accuracy over traditional probabilistic flood mapping approaches. While previous studies have developed ML-based models for specific local regions, this study aims to establish a methodology for estimating flood depth on a global scale using ML algorithms and freely available datasets—a challenging yet critical task. To support model generalization, 45 catchments from diverse geographic regions were selected based on elevation, land use, land cover, and soil type variations. The datasets were meticulously preprocessed, ensuring normality, eliminating outliers, and scaling. These preprocessed data were then split into subgroups: 75% for training and 25% for testing, with six additional unseen catchments from the USA reserved for validation. A sensitivity analysis was performed across several ML models (ANN, CNN, RNN, LSTM, Random Forest, XGBoost), leading to the selection of the Random Forest (RF) algorithm for both flood inundation classification and flood depth regression models. Three regression models were assessed for flood depth prediction. The pixel-based regression model achieved an R² of 91% for training and 69% for testing. Introducing a pixel clustering regression model improved the testing R² to 75%, with an overall validation (for unseen catchments) R² of 64%. The catchment-based clustering regression model yielded the most robust performance, with an R² of 83% for testing and 82% for validation. The developed ML model demonstrates breakthrough computational efficiency, generating complete flood depth predictions in just 6 min—a 225× speed improvement (90–95% time reduction) over conventional HEC-RAS 6.3 simulations. This rapid processing enables the practical implementation of flood early warning systems. Despite the dramatic speed gains, the solution maintains high predictive accuracy, evidenced by statistically robust 95% confidence intervals and strong spatial agreement with HEC-RAS benchmark maps. These findings highlight the critical role of the spatial variability of dependencies in enhancing model accuracy, representing a meaningful approach forward in scalable modeling frameworks with potential for global generalization of flood depth.

Anew and simple model for sizing surge vessels on pumping mains has been developed. The Monte Carlo Simulation (MCS) is utilized to generate 2000 realizations for various cases of up- and down-surges. Approximate models are developed for the prediction of the initial and the expanded vessel’s gas volume. The developed models outperformed the existing design charts; yielding better scores in various statistical indicators, e.g. a high coefficient of determination of 0.94 and four orders of magnitude less error. The vessel’s initial gas volume is found to be affected mostly by the pipe diameter and static head, while the expanded gas volume depends on the initial gas volume and the static head. The error analysis revealed that the predicted models had a low error band of $+/-$0.36 compared to $+/-$0.78 for previous design charts. These developed approximate models can serve as a basis for preliminary surge protection size selection during feasibility study phases.