Mulugeta Gebregziabher

Prof. Dr. Mulugeta Gebregziabher

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

23Years (2004-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
30 April 2015 in CardioVascular Journal of Africa
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
MOMo Owolabi
Mo Owolabi
SAS Akarolo-Anthony
S Akarolo-Anthony
RAR Akinyemi
R Akinyemi
DAD Arnett
D Arnett
Mulugeta GebregziabherMulugeta Gebregziabher
Mulugeta Gebregziabher
BOB Ovbiagele
B Ovbiagele
Information on the current burden of stroke in Africa is limited. The aim of this review was to comprehensively examine the current and projected burden of stroke in Africa. We systematically reviewed the available literature (PubMed and AJOL) from January 1960 and June 2014 on stroke in Africa. Percentage change in age-adjusted stroke incidence, mortality and disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) for African countries between 1990 and 2010 were calculated from the Global Burden of Diseases (GBD) model-derived figures. Community-based studies revealed an age-standardised annual stroke incidence rate of up to 316 per 100,000 population, and age-standardised prevalence rates of up to 981 per 100,000. Model-based estimates showed significant mean increases in age-standardised stroke incidence. The peculiar factors responsible for the substantial disparities in incidence velocity, ischaemic stroke proportion, mean age and case fatality compared to high-income countries remain unknown. While the available study data and evidence are limited, the burden of stroke in Africa appears to be increasing.

4 June 2008 in European Radiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
BRBalazs Ruzsics
Balazs Ruzsics
HLHeon Lee
Heon Lee
PZPeter L. Zwerner
Peter L. Zwerner
Mulugeta GebregziabherMulugeta Gebregziabher
Mulugeta Gebregziabher
PCPhilip Costello
Philip Costello
USU. Joseph Schoepf
U. Joseph Schoepf

1 March 2016 in American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
NTNichole T. Tanner
Nichole T. Tanner
NKNeeti M. Kanodra
Neeti M. Kanodra
Mulugeta GebregziabherMulugeta Gebregziabher
Mulugeta Gebregziabher
EPElizabeth Payne
Elizabeth Payne
CHChanita Hughes Halbert
Chanita Hughes Halbert
GSGerard A. Silvestri
Gerard A. Silvestri
Rationale: Smoking is the largest contributor to lung cancer risk, and those who continue to smoke after diagnosis have a worse survival. Screening for lung cancer with low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) reduces mortality in high-risk individuals. Smoking cessation is an essential component of a high-quality screening program. Objectives: To quantify the effects of smoking history and abstinence on mortality in high-risk individuals who participated in the NLST (National Lung Screening Trial). Methods: This is a secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial (NLST). Measurements and Main Results: Measurements included self-reported demographics, medical and smoking history, and lung cancer–specific and all-cause mortality. Cox regression was used to study the association of mortality with smoking status and pack-years. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were examined for differences in survival based on trial arm and smoking status. Current smokers had an increased lung cancer–specific (hazard ratio [HR], 2.14–2.29) and all-cause mortality (HR, 1.79–1.85) compared with former smokers irrespective of screening arm. Former smokers in the control arm abstinent for 7 years had a 20% mortality reduction comparable with the benefit reported with LDCT screening in the NLST. The maximum benefit was seen with the combination of smoking abstinence at 15 years and LDCT screening, which resulted in a 38% reduction in lung cancer–specific mortality (HR, 0.62; 95% confidence interval, 0.51–0.76). Conclusions: Seven years of smoking abstinence reduced lung cancer–specific mortality at a magnitude comparable with LDCT screening. This reduction was greater when abstinence was combined with screening, highlighting the importance of smoking cessation efforts in screening programs.

1 October 2009 in Journal of Nuclear Cardiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
RLRumman Langah
Rumman Langah
KSKenneth Spicer
Kenneth Spicer
Mulugeta GebregziabherMulugeta Gebregziabher
Mulugeta Gebregziabher
LGLeonie Gordon
Leonie Gordon

14 November 2012 in Diabetes Care
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LELeonard E. Egede
Leonard E. Egede
Mulugeta GebregziabherMulugeta Gebregziabher
Mulugeta Gebregziabher
CDClara E. Dismuke
Clara E. Dismuke
CLCheryl P. Lynch
Cheryl P. Lynch
RAR. Neal Axon
R. Neal Axon
PMPatrick D. Mauldin
Patrick D. Mauldin
OBJECTIVE To examine the longitudinal effects of medication nonadherence (MNA) on key costs and estimate potential savings from increased adherence using a novel methodology that accounts for shared correlation among cost categories. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS Veterans with type 2 diabetes (740,195) were followed from January 2002 until death, loss to follow-up, or December 2006. A novel multivariate, generalized, linear, mixed modeling approach was used to assess the differential effect of MNA, defined as medication possession ratio (MPR) ≥0.8 on healthcare costs. A sensitivity analysis was performed to assess potential cost savings at different MNA levels using the Consumer Price Index to adjust estimates to 2012 dollar value. RESULTS Mean MPR for the full sample over 5 years was 0.78, with a mean of 0.93 for the adherent group and 0.58 for the MNA group. In fully adjusted models, all annual cost categories increased ∼3% per year (P = 0.001) during the 5-year study time period. MNA was associated with a 37% lower pharmacy cost, 7% lower outpatient cost, and 41% higher inpatient cost. Based on sensitivity analyses, improving adherence in the MNA group would result in annual estimated cost savings ranging from ∼$661 million (MPR <0.6 vs. ≥0.6) to ∼$1.16 billion (MPR <1 vs. 1). Maximal incremental annual savings would occur by raising MPR from <0.8 to ≥0.8 ($204,530,778) among MNA subjects. CONCLUSIONS Aggressive strategies and policies are needed to achieve optimal medication adherence in diabetes. Such approaches may further the so-called “triple aim” of achieving better health, better quality care, and lower cost.

15 July 2015 in American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
NTNichole T. Tanner
Nichole T. Tanner
Mulugeta GebregziabherMulugeta Gebregziabher
Mulugeta Gebregziabher
CHChanita Hughes Halbert
Chanita Hughes Halbert
EPElizabeth Payne
Elizabeth Payne
LELeonard E. Egede
Leonard E. Egede
GSGerard A. Silvestri
Gerard A. Silvestri
Rationale: Black individuals with lung cancer (LC) experience higher mortality because they present with more advanced disease and are less likely to undergo curative resection for early-stage disease. The National Lung Screening Trial (NLST) demonstrated improved LC mortality by screening high-risk patients with low-dose computed tomography (LDCT). The benefit of LDCT screening in black individuals is unknown. Objectives: Examine results of the NLST by race. Methods: This was a secondary analysis of a randomized trial (NCT00047385) performed in 33 U.S. centers. Measurements and Main Results: Overall and lung cancer–specific mortality were measured. Screening with LDCT reduced LC mortality in all racial groups but more so in black individuals (hazard ratio [HR], 0.61 vs. 0.86). Smoking increased the likelihood of death from LC, and when stratified by race black smokers were twice as likely to die as white smokers (HR, 4.10 vs. 2.25). Adjusting for sociodemographic and behavioral characteristics, black individuals experienced higher all-cause mortality than white individuals (HR, 1.35; 95% confidence interval, 1.22–1.49); however, black individuals screened with LDCT had a reduction in all-cause mortality. Black individuals were younger, were more likely to be current smokers, had more comorbidities, and had fewer years of formal education than white individuals (P < 0.05). Conclusions: Black individuals screened with LDCT had decreased mortality from lung cancer. However, the demographics associated with improved LC survival were less commonly found in black individuals. The overall mortality in the NLST was higher for black individuals than white individuals, but improved in black individuals screened, suggesting that this subgroup may have had improved access to care. To realize the reductions in mortality from LC screening, dissemination efforts need to be tailored to meet the needs of this community.