Background: Machine learning (ML) and big data analytics are rapidly transforming health care, particularly disease prediction, management, and personalized care. With the increasing availability of real-world data (RWD) from diverse sources, such as electronic health records (EHRs), patient registries, and wearable devices, ML techniques present substantial potential to enhance clinical outcomes. Despite this promise, challenges such as data quality, model transparency, generalizability, and integration into clinical practice persist. Objective: This systematic review aims to examine the use of ML for analyzing RWD in disease prediction and management, identifying the most commonly used ML methods, prevalent disease types, study designs, and the sources of real-world evidence (RWE). It also explores the strengths and limitations of current practices, offering insights for future improvements. Methods: A comprehensive search was conducted following the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines to identify studies using ML techniques for analyzing RWD in disease prediction and management. The search focused on extracting data regarding the ML algorithms applied; disease categories studied; types of study designs (eg, clinical trials and cohort studies); and the sources of RWE, including EHRs, patient registries, and wearable devices. Studies published between 2014 and 2024 were included to ensure the analysis of the most recent advances in the field. Results: This review identified 57 studies that met the inclusion criteria, with a total sample size of >150,000 patients. The most frequently applied ML methods were random forest (n=24, 42%), logistic regression (n=21, 37%), and support vector machines (n=18, 32%). These methods were predominantly used for predictive modeling across disease areas, including cardiovascular diseases (n=19, 33%), cancer (n=9, 16%), and neurological disorders (n=6, 11%). RWE was primarily sourced from EHRs, patient registries, and wearable devices. A substantial portion of studies (n=38, 67%) focused on improving clinical decision-making, patient stratification, and treatment optimization. Among these studies, 14 (25%) focused on decision-making; 12 (21%) on health care outcomes, such as quality of life, recovery rates, and adverse events; and 11 (19%) on survival prediction, particularly in oncology and chronic diseases. For example, random forest models for cardiovascular disease prediction demonstrated an area under the curve of 0.85 (95% CI 0.81-0.89), while support vector machine models for cancer prognosis achieved an accuracy of 83% (P=.04). Despite the promising outcomes, many (n=34, 60%) studies faced challenges related to data quality, model interpretability, and ensuring generalizability across diverse patient populations. Conclusions: This systematic review highlights the significant potential of ML and big data analytics in health care, especially for improving disease prediction and management. However, to fully realize the benefits of these technologies, future research must focus on addressing the challenges of data quality, enhancing model transparency, and ensuring the broader applicability of ML models across diverse populations and clinical settings.

Background/Objectives: Artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming drug discovery and development by enhancing the speed and precision of identifying drug candidates and optimizing their efficacy. This review evaluates the application of AI in various stages of drug discovery, from hit identification to lead optimization, and its impact on clinical outcomes. The objective is to provide insights into the role of AI across therapeutic areas and assess its contributions to improving clinical trial efficiency and pharmaceutical outcomes. Methods: A systematic review followed PRISMA guidelines to analyze studies published between 2015 and 2025, focusing on AI in drug discovery and development. A comprehensive search was performed across multiple databases to identify studies employing AI techniques. The studies were categorized based on AI methods, clinical phase, and therapeutic area. The percentages of AI methods used, clinical phase stages, and the therapeutic regions were analyzed to identify trends. Results: AI methods included machine learning (ML) at 40.9%, molecular modeling and simulation (MMS) at 20.7%, and deep learning (DL) at 10.3%. Oncology accounted for the majority of studies (72.8%), followed by dermatology (5.8%) and neurology (5.2%). In clinical phases, 39.3% of studies were in the preclinical stage, 23.1% in Clinical Phase I, and 11.0% in the transitional phase. Clinical outcome reporting was observed in 45% of studies, with 97% reporting industry partnerships. Conclusions: AI significantly enhances drug discovery and development, improving drug efficacy and clinical trial outcomes. Future work should focus on expanding AI applications into underrepresented therapeutic areas and refining models to handle complex biological systems.

Effective suppression of JAK–STAT signalling by the inducible inhibitor “suppressor of cytokine signalling 3” (SOCS3) is essential for limiting signalling from cytokine receptors. Here we show that cavin-1, a component of caveolae, is a functionally significant SOCS3-interacting protein. Biochemical and confocal imaging demonstrate that SOCS3 localisation to the plasma membrane requires cavin-1. SOCS3 is also critical for cavin-1 stabilisation, such that deletion of SOCS3 reduces the expression of cavin-1 and caveolin-1 proteins, thereby reducing caveola abundance in endothelial cells. Moreover, the interaction of cavin-1 and SOCS3 is essential for SOCS3 function, as loss of cavin-1 enhances cytokine-stimulated STAT3 phosphorylation and abolishes SOCS3-dependent inhibition of IL-6 signalling by cyclic AMP. Together, these findings reveal a new functionally important mechanism linking SOCS3-mediated inhibition of cytokine signalling to localisation at the plasma membrane via interaction with and stabilisation of cavin-1.

This study evaluates the performance of various structure prediction tools and molecular docking platforms for therapeutic peptides targeting coronary artery disease (CAD). Structure prediction tools, including AlphaFold 3, I-TASSER 5.1, and PEP-FOLD 4, were employed to generate accurate peptide conformations. These methods, ranging from deep-learning-based (AlphaFold) to template-based (I-TASSER 5.1) and fragment-based (PEP-FOLD), were selected for their proven capabilities in predicting reliable structures. Molecular docking was conducted using four platforms (HADDOCK 2.4, HPEPDOCK 2.0, ClusPro 2.0, and HawDock 2.0) to assess binding affinities and interactions. A 100 ns molecular dynamics (MD) simulation was performed to evaluate the stability of the peptide–receptor complexes, along with Molecular Mechanics/Poisson–Boltzmann Surface Area (MM/PBSA) calculations to determine binding free energies. The results demonstrated that Apelin, a therapeutic peptide, exhibited superior binding affinities and stability across all platforms, making it a promising candidate for CAD therapy. Apelin’s interactions with key receptors involved in cardiovascular health were notably stronger and more stable compared to the other peptides tested. These findings underscore the importance of integrating advanced computational tools for peptide design and evaluation, offering valuable insights for future therapeutic applications in CAD. Future work should focus on in vivo validation and combination therapies to fully explore the clinical potential of these therapeutic peptides.

Background/Objectives: The rise of virtual bioequivalence studies has transformed the pharmaceutical landscape, enabling more efficient drug development processes. This systematic review aims to explore advancements in physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling, its regulatory implications, and its role in achieving virtual bioequivalence, particularly for complex drug formulations. Methods: We conducted a systematic review of clinical trials using computational methods, particularly PBPK modeling, to carry out bioequivalence assessments. Eligibility criteria are emphasized during in silico modeling and pharmacokinetic simulations. Comprehensive literature searches were performed across databases such as PubMed, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library. A search strategy using key terms and Boolean operators ensured that extensive coverage was achieved. We adhered to the PRISMA guidelines in regard to the study selection, data extraction, and quality assessment, focusing on key characteristics, methodologies, outcomes, and regulatory perspectives from the FDA and EMA. Results: Our findings indicate that PBPK modeling significantly enhances the prediction of pharmacokinetic profiles, optimizing dosing regimens, while minimizing the need for extensive clinical trials. Regulatory agencies have recognized this utility, with the FDA and EMA developing frameworks to integrate in silico methods into drug evaluations. However, challenges such as study heterogeneity and publication bias may limit the generalizability of the results. Conclusions: This review highlights the critical need for standardized protocols and robust regulatory guidelines to facilitate the integration of virtual bioequivalence methodologies into pharmaceutical practices. By embracing these advancements, the pharmaceutical industry can improve drug development efficiency and patient outcomes, paving the way for innovative therapeutic solutions. Continued research and adaptive regulatory frameworks will be essential in navigating this evolving field.

Suppressor of cytokine signaling 2 (SOCS2), an E3 ubiquitin ligase, regulates the JAK/STAT signaling pathway, essential for cytokine signaling and immune responses. Its dysregulation contributes to cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) by promoting abnormal cell growth, inflammation, and resistance to cell death. This study aimed to elucidate the molecular mechanisms underlying the interactions between Lumbricus-derived proteins and peptides and SOCS2, with a focus on identifying potential therapeutic candidates for CVDs. Utilizing a multifaceted approach, advanced computational methodologies, including 3D structure modeling, protein–protein docking, 100 ns molecular dynamics (MD) simulations, and MM/PBSA calculations, were employed to assess the binding affinities and functional implications of Lumbricus-derived proteins on SOCS2 activity. The findings revealed that certain proteins, such as Lumbricin, Chemoattractive glycoprotein ES20, and Lumbrokinase-7T1, exhibited similar activities to standard antagonists in modulating SOCS2 activity. Furthermore, MM/PBSA calculations were employed to assess the binding free energies of these proteins with SOCS2. Specifically, Lumbricin exhibited an average ΔG_binding of −59.25 kcal/mol, Chemoattractive glycoprotein ES20 showed −55.02 kcal/mol, and Lumbrokinase-7T1 displayed −69.28 kcal/mol. These values suggest strong binding affinities between these proteins and SOCS2, reinforcing their potential therapeutic efficacy in cardiovascular diseases. Further in vitro and animal studies are recommended to validate these findings and explore broader applications of Lumbricus-derived proteins.