The association between age and language recovery in stroke remains unclear. Here, we used neuroimaging data to estimate brain age, a measure of structural integrity, and examined the extent to which brain age at stroke onset is associated with (i) cross-sectional language performance, and (ii) longitudinal recovery of language function, beyond chronological age alone. A total of 49 participants (age: 65.2 ± 12.2 years, 25 female) underwent routine clinical neuroimaging (T1) and a bedside evaluation of language performance (Bedside Evaluation Screening Test-2) at onset of left hemisphere stroke. Brain age was estimated from enantiomorphically reconstructed brain scans using a machine learning algorithm trained on a large sample of healthy adults. A subsample of 30 participants returned for follow-up language assessments at least 2 years after stroke onset. To account for variability in age at stroke, we calculated proportional brain age difference, i.e. the proportional difference between brain age and chronological age. Multiple regression models were constructed to test the effects of proportional brain age difference on language outcomes. Lesion volume and chronological age were included as covariates in all models. Accelerated brain age compared with age was associated with worse overall aphasia severity (F(1, 48) = 5.65, P = 0.022), naming (F(1, 48) = 5.13, P = 0.028), and speech repetition (F(1, 48) = 8.49, P = 0.006) at stroke onset. Follow-up assessments were carried out ≥2 years after onset; decelerated brain age relative to age was significantly associated with reduced overall aphasia severity (F(1, 26) = 5.45, P = 0.028) and marginally failed to reach statistical significance for auditory comprehension (F(1, 26) = 2.87, P = 0.103). Proportional brain age difference was not found to be associated with changes in naming (F(1, 26) = 0.23, P = 0.880) and speech repetition (F(1, 26) = 0.00, P = 0.978). Chronological age was only associated with naming performance at stroke onset (F(1, 48) = 4.18, P = 0.047). These results indicate that brain age as estimated based on routine clinical brain scans may be a strong biomarker for language function and recovery after stroke.

Background and Objectives Chronic poststroke language impairment is typically worse in older individuals or those with large stroke lesions. However, there is unexplained variance that likely depends on intact tissue beyond the lesion. Brain age is an emerging concept, which is partially independent from chronologic age. Advanced brain age is associated with cognitive decline in healthy older adults; therefore, we aimed to investigate the relationship with stroke aphasia. We hypothesized that advanced brain age is a significant factor associated with chronic poststroke language impairments, above and beyond chronologic age, and lesion characteristics. Methods This cohort study retrospectively evaluated participants from the Predicting Outcomes of Language Rehabilitation in Aphasia clinical trial (NCT03416738), recruited through local advertisement in South Carolina (US). Primary inclusion criteria were left hemisphere stroke and chronic aphasia (≥12 months after stroke). Participants completed baseline behavioral testing including the Western Aphasia Battery–Revised (WAB-R), Philadelphia Naming Test (PNT), Pyramids and Palm Trees Test (PPTT), and Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale Matrices subtest, before completing 6 weeks of language therapy. The PNT was repeated 1 month after therapy. We leveraged modern neuroimaging techniques to estimate brain age and computed a proportional difference between chronologic age and estimated brain age. Multiple linear regression models were used to evaluate the relationship between proportional brain age difference (PBAD) and behavior. Results Participants (N = 93, 58 males and 35 females, average age = 61 years) had estimated brain ages ranging from 14 years younger to 23 years older than chronologic age. Advanced brain age predicted performance on semantic tasks (PPTT) and language tasks (WAB-R). For participants with advanced brain aging (n = 47), treatment gains (improvement on the PNT) were independently predicted by PBAD (T = −2.0474, p = 0.0468, 9% of variance explained). Discussion Through the application of modern neuroimaging techniques, advanced brain aging was associated with aphasia severity and performance on semantic tasks. Notably, therapy outcome scores were also associated with PBAD, albeit only among participants with advanced brain aging. These findings corroborate the importance of brain age as a determinant of poststroke recovery and underscore the importance of personalized health factors in determining recovery trajectories, which should be considered during the planning or implementation of therapeutic interventions.

Premature age-related brain changes may be influenced by physical health factors. Lower socioeconomic status (SES) is often associated with poorer physical health. In this study, we aimed to investigate the relationship between SES and premature brain aging. Brain age was estimated from T1-weighted images using BrainAgeR in 217 participants from the ABC@UofSC Repository. The difference between brain and chronological age (BrainGAP) was calculated. Multiple regression models were used to predict BrainGAP with age, SES, body mass index, diabetes, hypertension, sex, race, and education as predictors. SES was calculated from size-adjusted household income and the cost of living. Fifty-five participants (25.35%) had greater brain age than chronological age (premature brain aging). Multiple regression models revealed that age, sex, and SES were significant predictors of BrainGAP with lower SES associated with greater BrainGAP (premature brain aging). This study demonstrates that lower SES is an independent contributor to premature brain aging. This may provide additional insight into the mechanisms associated with brain health, cognition, and resilience to neurological injury.

Background: Brain age is an MRI-derived estimate of brain tissue loss that has a similar pattern to aging-related atrophy. White matter hyperintensities (WMHs) are neuroimaging markers of small vessel disease and may represent subtle signs of brain compromise. We tested the hypothesis that WMHs are independently associated with premature brain age in an original aging cohort. Methods: Brain age was calculated using machine-learning on whole-brain tissue estimates from T1-weighted images using the BrainAgeR analysis pipeline in 166 healthy adult participants. WMHs were manually delineated on FLAIR images. WMH load was defined as the cumulative volume of WMHs. A positive difference between estimated brain age and chronological age (BrainGAP) was used as a measure of premature brain aging. Then, partial Pearson correlations between BrainGAP and volume of WMHs were calculated (accounting for chronological age). Results: Brain and chronological age were strongly correlated (r(163)=0.932, p<0.001). There was significant negative correlation between BrainGAP scores and chronological age (r(163)=-0.244, p<0.001) indicating that younger participants had higher BrainGAP (premature brain aging). Chronological age also showed a positive correlation with WMH load (r(163)=0.506, p<0.001) indicating older participants had increased WMH load. Controlling for chronological age, there was a statistically significant relationship between premature brain aging and WMHs load (r(163)=0.216, p=0.003). Each additional year in brain age beyond chronological age corresponded to an additional 1.1mm3 in WMH load. Conclusions: WMHs are an independent factor associated with premature brain aging. This finding underscores the impact of white matter disease on global brain integrity and progressive age-like brain atrophy.

White matter hyperintensities (WMHs) are prevalent in older age and are associated with cognitive decline. The location and extent of WMHs likely influences the relationship with behavior. Identifying which tracts are more likely impacted by WMHs might enable better understanding of which behaviors are affected. Therefore, this study aimed to i) identify which white matter tracts are most affected by WMHs, and ii) identify tracts where the presence of WMHs is associated with poorer cognitive scores. Participants (N = 212, 20–80 years) completed the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA). WMHs were manually delineated on FLAIR scans. In DSIStudio, we used the Human Connectome Project 1065FIB template to track how many fibers of each white matter tract intersected each participant’s WMH map. Values obtained represent disconnection associated with WMHs. These scores were correlated with age, MoCA total and memory index scores. There was significantly more disconnection with older age in the right arcuate fasciculus, extreme capsule, frontal aslant tract, bilateral inferior, middle and superior longitudinal fasciculi, and the corpus callosum. Disconnection associated with WMHs in the right superior longitudinal fasciculus was significantly associated with a lower MoCA scores. Finally, disconnection in the right extreme capsule, middle and superior longitudinal fascicli, and bilateral frontal aslant tracts were significantly associated with lower MoCA memory index scores. This study highlights the prevalence of WMHs across the lifespan and demonstrates a clear relationship between tract-specific WMHs and cognition. Age-related white-matter degeneration was pronounced in many association fibers, particularly in the right hemisphere. These data suggest age related disruption of specific white matter tracts represents a clear and present risk factor for global cognition and memory as we age.