Amir Nutman

Dr. Amir Nutman

Deputy Director, Wolfson Medical Center, H̱olon, Tel Aviv, Israel
+1
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

16Years (2011-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 September 2020 in Clinical Microbiology and Infection
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ANAmir Nutman
Amir Nutman
JLJonathan Lellouche
Jonathan Lellouche
ETElizabeth Temkin
Elizabeth Temkin
GDGeorge Daikos
George Daikos
ASAnna Skiada
Anna Skiada
AKAnders Kristoffersson
Anders Kristoffersson

1 December 2014 in Clinical Microbiology and Infection
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ANAmir Nutman
Amir Nutman
RGR. Glick
R. Glick
ETE. Temkin
E. Temkin
MHM. Hoshen
M. Hoshen
RER. Edgar
R. Edgar
YCY. Carmeli
Y. Carmeli
Carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB) is an increasingly common nosocomial pathogen. We sought to identify clinical and microbiological predictors of 14-day mortality among patients with CRAB bacteraemia. This case-control study included all adult patients in one Israeli hospital with CRAB on blood culture between July 2008 and June 2011. Cases were defined as patients who died within 14 days of bacteraemia onset and controls as patients who survived over 14 days. Sequence-typing of the blaOXA-51-like gene and REP-PCR identified CRAB clone groups. Logistic regression was performed to analyze predictors of 14-day all-cause mortality. To correct for differences in treatment onset, Cox regression was used to examine the effect of receiving an active antibiotic. Eighty-three cases and 89 controls were included. Six major CRAB clone groups were identified, with 14-day mortality ranging from 17 to 66%. Independent predictors of 14-day mortality were severity of illness (OR = 1.38 for each 1-point increase in Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score; 95% CI, 1.21, 1.56), independence in activities of daily living (ADL) on admission (OR = 3.40; 95% CI, 1.20, 9.67, for fully dependent vs. independent), surgery before bacteraemia (OR = 0.25; 95% CI, 0.11, 0.59) and clone group (OR = 7.76; 95% CI, 2.52, 23.85, for the most virulent group vs. the reference group). In the multivariate Cox model using a propensity score to adjust for SOFA, clone, ADL and surgery, active antibiotic treatment was protective (HR = 0.30; 95% CI, 0.15, 0.60). Differences in virulence between CRAB clones may partly explain heterogeneous results in previous studies of mortality following CRAB infection.

1 November 2016 in Clinical Microbiology and Infection
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ANAmir Nutman
Amir Nutman
ALA. Lerner
A. Lerner
DSD. Schwartz
D. Schwartz
YCY. Carmeli
Y. Carmeli

19 June 2019 in Clinical Infectious Diseases
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
ANAmir Nutman
Amir Nutman
ETElizabeth Temkin
Elizabeth Temkin
SHStephan Harbarth
Stephan Harbarth
BCBiljana Carevic
Biljana Carevic
FRFrederic Ris
Frederic Ris
YCYehuda Carmeli
Yehuda Carmeli
Background: Carriers of extended-spectrum β-lactamase–producing Enterobacteriaceae (ESBL-PE) who receive cephalosporin-based prophylaxis have twice the risk of surgical site infection (SSI) following colorectal surgery as noncarriers. We tested whether ESBL-PE screening and personalized prophylaxis with ertapenem reduces SSI risk among carriers. Methods: We conducted a prospective nonrandomized, nonblinded, interventional study in 3 hospitals in Israel, Switzerland, and Serbia. Patients were screened for ESBL-PE carriage before elective colorectal surgery. During the baseline phase, departmental guidelines advised prophylaxis with a cephalosporin plus metronidazole. In the intervention phase, guidelines were changed for ESBL-PE carriers to receive ertapenem. The primary outcome was any type of SSI within 30 days. We calculated adjusted risk differences (ARDs) following logistic regression. Results: The intention-to-treat analysis compared 209 ESBL-PE carriers in the baseline phase to 269 in the intervention phase. SSI rates were 21.5% and 17.5%, respectively (ARD, –4.7% [95% confidence interval {CI}, –11.8% to 2.4%]). Unplanned crossover was high (15%), so to assess efficacy we performed an as-treated analysis comparing 247 patients who received cephalosporin-based prophylaxis with 221 who received ertapenem. SSI rates were 22.7% and 15.8%, respectively (ARD, –7.7% [95% CI, –14.6% to –.8%]), and rates of SSI caused by ESBL-PE were 6.5% and 0.9%, respectively (ARD, –5.6% [95% CI, –8.9% to –2.3%]). There was no significant difference in the rate of deep SSI. The number needed to treat to prevent 1 SSI in ESBL-PE carriers was 13. Conclusions: Screening for ESBL-PE carriage before colorectal surgery and personalizing prophylaxis for carriers is efficacious in reducing SSI.

19 June 2020 in Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ANAmir Nutman
Amir Nutman
ETElizabeth Temkin
Elizabeth Temkin
JLJonathan Lellouche
Jonathan Lellouche
DDDebby Ben David
Debby Ben David
DSDavid Schwartz
David Schwartz
YCYehuda Carmeli
Yehuda Carmeli
We compared the yield of culturing various body sites to detect carriage of carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB). Culturing the skin using a premoistened sponge, with overnight enrichment and plating on CHROMagar MDR Acinetobacter, had the highest yield: 92%. Skin is satisfactory as a single site for active surveillance of CRAB.

26 October 2016 in Israel Journal of Health Policy Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ANAmir Nutman
Amir Nutman
NYNaomi Yoeli
Naomi Yoeli
Vaccinating healthcare personnel (HCP) against influenza is important to prevent transmission and morbidity among patients and staff. We conducted an online survey assessing knowledge, perceptions and attitudes concerning influenza vaccination among HCP. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to identify independent predictors of vaccination. The survey was completed by 468 HCP representing all categories of staff. Doctors believed that vaccination was the best way to prevent influenza and perceived the vaccine less harmful as compared to nurses and allied health professionals. Getting vaccinated was associated with a greater likelihood of recommending vaccination to patients: 86 % vs. 54 % in vaccinated and unvaccinated HCP, respectively. Reasons for vaccine refusal were fear of needles (19 %); fear of side effects (66 %) and lack of time (16 %). In the multivariate analysis, survey items that were independently associated with vaccination were beliefs that: vaccine effectively prevents influenza (OR 4.07 95 % CI 2.51, 6.58); HCP are at increased risk of influenza (OR 2.82 95 % CI 1.56, 5.13); vaccine can cause influenza (OR 0.41 95 % CI 0.25, 0.65); contracting influenza is likely in the absence of vaccination (OR 1.96 95 % CI 1.12, 3.42); and that HCP might transmit influenza to their family (OR 4.54 95 % CI 1.38, 14.97). The belief that HCP might transmit influenza to patients was not independently associated with vaccine uptake. Our study revealed misconceptions and knowledge gaps concerning the risk of influenza and the influenza vaccine. There were significant differences in knowledge and attitudes between healthcare professions. HCP decline vaccination because they do not perceive a personal risk of influenza infection and are concerned about side effects. Thus, in order to increase vaccination rates it is important to educate HCP to correct misconceptions concerning vaccine efficacy and safety, while promoting the benefit of getting vaccinated in order to protect themselves and their families.