Olga Kiseleva

Dr. Olga Kiseleva

Institute of Biomedical Chemistry, Moscow, Russia
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

12Years (2015-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
VAViktoriia Armenovna Arzumanian
Viktoriia Armenovna Arzumanian
OKOlga Kiseleva
Olga Kiseleva
EPEkaterina Poverennaya
Ekaterina Poverennaya
Liver cancer is the third leading cause of cancer death worldwide. Representing such a dramatic impact on our lives, liver cancer is a significant public health concern. Sustainable and reliable methods for preventing and treating liver cancer require fundamental research on its molecular mechanisms. Cell lines are treated as in vitro equivalents of tumor tissues, making them a must-have for basic research on the nature of cancer. According to recent discoveries, certified cell lines retain most genetic properties of the original tumor and mimic its microenvironment. On the other hand, modern technologies allowing the deepest level of detail in omics landscapes have shown significant differences even between samples of the same cell line due to cross- and mycoplasma infection. This and other observations suggest that, in some cases, cell cultures are not suitable as cancer models, with limited predictive value for the effectiveness of new treatments. HepG2 is a popular hepatic cell line. It is used in a wide range of studies, from the oncogenesis to the cytotoxicity of substances on the liver. In this regard, we set out to collect up-to-date information on the HepG2 cell line to assess whether the level of heterogeneity of the cell line allows in vitro biomedical studies as a model with guaranteed production and quality.

Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
VAViktoriia Armenovna Arzumanian
Viktoriia Armenovna Arzumanian
GDGeorgii Vladimirovich Dolgalev
Georgii Vladimirovich Dolgalev
Ilia Yurievich KurbatovIlia Yurievich Kurbatov
Ilia Yurievich Kurbatov
OKOlga Kiseleva
Olga Kiseleva
EPEkaterina Poverennaya
Ekaterina Poverennaya
The alphabet of building blocks for RNA molecules is much larger than the standard four nucleotides. The diversity is achieved by the post-transcriptional biochemical modification of these nucleotides into distinct chemical entities that are structurally and functionally different from their unmodified counterparts. Some of these modifications are constituent and critical for RNA functions, while others serve as dynamic markings to regulate the fate of specific RNA molecules. Together, these modifications form the epitranscriptome, an essential layer of cellular biochemistry. As of the time of writing this review, more than 300 distinct RNA modifications from all three life domains have been identified. However, only a few of the most well-established modifications are included in most reviews on this topic. To provide a complete overview of the current state of research on the epitranscriptome, we analyzed the extent of the available information for all known RNA modifications. We selected 25 modifications to describe in detail. Summarizing our findings, we describe the current status of research on most RNA modifications and identify further developments in this field.

24 December 2021 in Metabolites
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
OKOlga Kiseleva
Olga Kiseleva
Ilia Yurievich KurbatovIlia Yurievich Kurbatov
Ilia Yurievich Kurbatov
EIEkaterina Ilgisonis
Ekaterina Ilgisonis
EPEkaterina Poverennaya
Ekaterina Poverennaya
Metabolomics uses advanced analytical chemistry methods to analyze metabolites in biological samples. The most intensively studied samples are blood and its liquid components: plasma and serum. Armed with advanced equipment and progressive software solutions, the scientific community has shown that small molecules’ roles in living systems are not limited to traditional “building blocks” or “just fuel” for cellular energy. As a result, the conclusions based on studying the metabolome are finding practical reflection in molecular medicine and a better understanding of fundamental biochemical processes in living systems. This review is not a detailed protocol of metabolomic analysis. However, it should support the reader with information about the achievements in the whole process of metabolic exploration of human plasma and serum using mass spectrometry combined with gas chromatography.

11 November 2023 in Genes
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
EPElena A. Ponomarenko
Elena A. Ponomarenko
GKGeorge S. Krasnov
George S. Krasnov
OKOlga Kiseleva
Olga Kiseleva
PKPolina Kryukova
Polina Kryukova
VAViktoriia Armenovna Arzumanian
Viktoriia Armenovna Arzumanian
EPEkaterina Poverennaya
Ekaterina Poverennaya
Transcriptomics methods (RNA-Seq, PCR) today are more routine and reproducible than proteomics methods, i.e., both mass spectrometry and immunochemical analysis. For this reason, most scientific studies are limited to assessing the level of mRNA content. At the same time, protein content (and its post-translational status) largely determines the cell’s state and behavior. Such a forced extrapolation of conclusions from the transcriptome to the proteome often seems unjustified. The ratios of “transcript-protein” pairs can vary by several orders of magnitude for different genes. As a rule, the correlation coefficient between transcriptome–proteome levels for different tissues does not exceed 0.3–0.5. Several characteristics determine the ratio between the content of mRNA and protein: among them, the rate of movement of the ribosome along the mRNA and the number of free ribosomes in the cell, the availability of tRNA, the secondary structure, and the localization of the transcript. The technical features of the experimental methods also significantly influence the levels of the transcript and protein of the corresponding gene on the outcome of the comparison. Given the above biological features and the performance of experimental and bioinformatic approaches, one may develop various models to predict proteomic profiles based on transcriptomic data. This review is devoted to the ability of RNA sequencing methods for protein abundance prediction.

Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
IKIlya Kurbatov
Ilya Kurbatov
GDGeorgii Vladimirovich Dolgalev
Georgii Vladimirovich Dolgalev
VAViktoriia Armenovna Arzumanian
Viktoriia Armenovna Arzumanian
OKOlga Kiseleva
Olga Kiseleva
EPEkaterina Poverennaya
Ekaterina Poverennaya
Increasing attention has been focused on the study of protein–metabolite interactions (PMI), which play a key role in regulating protein functions and directing an orchestra of cellular processes. The investigation of PMIs is complicated by the fact that many such interactions are extremely short-lived, which requires very high resolution in order to detect them. As in the case of protein–protein interactions, protein–metabolite interactions are still not clearly defined. Existing assays for detecting protein–metabolite interactions have an additional limitation in the form of a limited capacity to identify interacting metabolites. Thus, although recent advances in mass spectrometry allow the routine identification and quantification of thousands of proteins and metabolites today, they still need to be improved to provide a complete inventory of biological molecules, as well as all interactions between them. Multiomic studies aimed at deciphering the implementation of genetic information often end with the analysis of changes in metabolic pathways, as they constitute one of the most informative phenotypic layers. In this approach, the quantity and quality of knowledge about PMIs become vital to establishing the full scope of crosstalk between the proteome and the metabolome in a biological object of interest. In this review, we analyze the current state of investigation into the detection and annotation of protein–metabolite interactions, describe the recent progress in developing associated research methods, and attempt to deconstruct the very term “interaction” to advance the field of interactomics further.

Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
GDGeorgii Vladimirovich Dolgalev
Georgii Vladimirovich Dolgalev
TSTaras A. Safonov
Taras A. Safonov
VAViktoriia Armenovna Arzumanian
Viktoriia Armenovna Arzumanian
OKOlga Kiseleva
Olga Kiseleva
EPEkaterina Poverennaya
Ekaterina Poverennaya
The continuous improvement of proteomic techniques, most notably mass spectrometry, has generated quantified proteomes of many organisms with unprecedented depth and accuracy. However, there is still a significant discrepancy in the reported numbers of total protein molecules per specific cell type. In this article, we explore the results of proteomic studies of Escherichia coli, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, and HeLa cells in terms of total protein copy numbers per cell. We observe up to a ten-fold difference between reported values. Investigating possible reasons for this discrepancy, we conclude that neither an unmeasured fraction of the proteome nor biases in the quantification of individual proteins can explain the observed discrepancy. We normalize protein copy numbers in each study using a total protein amount per cell as reported in the literature and create integrated proteome maps of the selected model organisms. Our results indicate that cells contain from one to three million protein molecules per µm3 and that protein copy density decreases with increasing organism complexity.