Margaret Kern

Dr. Margaret Kern

The University of Melbourne
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

20Years (2007-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
25 September 2013 in PLOS ONE
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
HSH Andrew Schwartz
H Andrew Schwartz
JEJohannes C Eichstaedt
Johannes C Eichstaedt
Margaret KernMargaret Kern
Margaret Kern
LDLukasz Dziurzynski
Lukasz Dziurzynski
SRStephanie M Ramones
Stephanie M Ramones
LULyle H Ungar
Lyle H Ungar
We analyzed 700 million words, phrases, and topic instances collected from the Facebook messages of 75,000 volunteers, who also took standard personality tests, and found striking variations in language with personality, gender, and age. In our open-vocabulary technique, the data itself drives a comprehensive exploration of language that distinguishes people, finding connections that are not captured with traditional closed-vocabulary word-category analyses. Our analyses shed new light on psychosocial processes yielding results that are face valid (e.g., subjects living in high elevations talk about the mountains), tie in with other research (e.g., neurotic people disproportionately use the phrase ‘sick of’ and the word ‘depressed’), suggest new hypotheses (e.g., an active life implies emotional stability), and give detailed insights (males use the possessive ‘my’ when mentioning their ‘wife’ or ‘girlfriend’ more often than females use ‘my’ with ‘husband’ or 'boyfriend’). To date, this represents the largest study, by an order of magnitude, of language and personality.

13 October 2016 in International Journal of Wellbeing
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JBJulie Butler
Julie Butler
Margaret KernMargaret Kern
Margaret Kern
The PERMA-Profiler: A brief multidimensional measure of flourishing

2 January 2021 in Australian Journal of Psychology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
KAKelly-Ann Allen
Kelly-Ann Allen
Margaret KernMargaret Kern
Margaret Kern
CRChristopher S. Rozek
Christopher S. Rozek
DMDennis M. McInerney
Dennis M. McInerney
GSGeorge M. Slavich
George M. Slavich
Objective: A sense of belonging – the subjective feeling of deep connection with social groups, physical places, and individual and collective experiences – is a fundamental human need that predicts numerous mental, physical, social, economic, and behavioural outcomes. However, varying perspectives on how belonging should be conceptualised, assessed, and cultivated has hampered much-needed progress on this timely and important topic. To address these critical issues, we conducted a narrative review that summarizes existing perspectives on belonging, describes a new integrative framework for understanding and studying belonging, and identifies several key avenues for future research and practice. Method: We searched relevant databases, including Google Scholar, PubMed, Scopus, PsycInfo, and ClinicalTrials.gov, for articles describing belonging, instruments for assessing belonging, and interventions for increasing belonging. Results: By identifying the core components of belonging, we introduce a new integrative framework for understanding, assessing, and cultivating belonging that focuses on four interrelated components: competencies, opportunities, motivations, and perceptions. Conclusion: This integrative framework enhances our understanding of the basic nature and features of belonging, provides a foundation for future interdisciplinary research on belonging and belongingness, and highlights how a robust sense of belonging may be cultivated to improve human health and resilience for individuals and communities worldwide. KEY POINTS What is already known about this topic: What this topic adds:

17 October 2016 in Educational Psychology Review
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
KAKelly Allen
Kelly Allen
Margaret KernMargaret Kern
Margaret Kern
Dianne A. Vella-BrodrickDianne A. Vella-Brodrick
Dianne A. Vella-Brodrick
JHJohn Hattie
John Hattie
LWLea Waters
Lea Waters

1 June 2011 in Journal of Research in Personality
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ADAngela Lee Duckworth
Angela Lee Duckworth
Margaret KernMargaret Kern
Margaret Kern

23 November 2016 in JMIR Mental Health
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
ESElizabeth M Seabrook
Elizabeth M Seabrook
Margaret KernMargaret Kern
Margaret Kern
NRNikki S Rickard
Nikki S Rickard
Background: Social networking sites (SNSs) have become a pervasive part of modern culture, which may also affect mental health. Objective: The aim of this systematic review was to identify and summarize research examining depression and anxiety in the context of SNSs. It also aimed to identify studies that complement the assessment of mental illness with measures of well-being and examine moderators and mediators that add to the complexity of this environment. Methods: A multidatabase search was performed. Papers published between January 2005 and June 2016 relevant to mental illness (depression and anxiety only) were extracted and reviewed. Results: Positive interactions, social support, and social connectedness on SNSs were consistently related to lower levels of depression and anxiety, whereas negative interaction and social comparisons on SNSs were related to higher levels of depression and anxiety. SNS use related to less loneliness and greater self-esteem and life satisfaction. Findings were mixed for frequency of SNS use and number of SNS friends. Different patterns in the way individuals with depression and individuals with social anxiety engage with SNSs are beginning to emerge. Conclusions: The systematic review revealed many mixed findings between depression, anxiety, and SNS use. Methodology has predominantly focused on self-report cross-sectional approaches; future research will benefit from leveraging real-time SNS data over time. The evidence suggests that SNS use correlates with mental illness and well-being; however, whether this effect is beneficial or detrimental depends at least partly on the quality of social factors in the SNS environment. Understanding these relationships will lead to better utilization of SNSs in their potential to positively influence mental health.