Pengfei Dang

Dr. Pengfei Dang

Guangzhou University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
+1

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

7Years (2020-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
27 January 2020 in Natural Hazards
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
PDPengfei Dang
Pengfei Dang
QLQifang Liu
Qifang Liu


7 March 2022 in Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDPengfei Dang
Pengfei Dang
JCJie Cui
Jie Cui
QLQifang Liu
Qifang Liu

30 March 2023 in Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
PDPengfei Dang
Pengfei Dang
JCJie Cui
Jie Cui
QLQifang Liu
Qifang Liu
LYLI Yadong
LI Yadong

5 August 2022 in Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDPengfei Dang
Pengfei Dang
CWChong Wang
Chong Wang
WQWenhao Qi
Wenhao Qi
YLYadong Li
Yadong Li

15 November 2021 in Earth and Space Science
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
PDPengfei Dang
Pengfei Dang
QLQifang Liu
Qifang Liu
SXSonglin Xia
Songlin Xia
WMWanjun Ma
Wanjun Ma
A stochastic finite‐fault approach based on corner frequency (EXSIM) is applied to simulate the Tottori M w 6.2 earthquake. The parameter κ 0 is calculated based on ground motion recordings. Other parameters, such as quality factor (127 f 0.61 ) and stress drop (27.97 bars) are taken from our earlier work. The slip distribution refers to the results of Kubo et al. (2017, https://doi.org/10.1186/s40623-017-0714-3 ). The geometric spreading function and ground motion duration are taken from Atkinson and Boore (1995, https://doi.org/10.1785/bssa0850010017 ). The simulated results match well with the observed values in a short period ( T < 1 s). In addition, the effects of hanging wall (HW) and footwall (FW) on the simulated values are discussed. The results show that the simulated results of HW stations are more consistent with the observed values than those of FW stations. The differences between simulated Pseudo Spectral Acceleration (PSA) and observed PSA with epicentral distance and azimuth are also analyzed. The results show that the local site amplification and geometric location of stations influence the simulation results for soft soil sites. Overall, the simulated ground motions obtained by applying EXSIM approach matched well with the observed recordings which could be considered as the basis for earthquake‐resistant design during the post‐disaster recovery and could become a powerful tool for earthquake ground motion prediction.