Philippe Lambin

Prof. Philippe Lambin

Head of the dpt of Precision Medicine, Maastricht University
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

35Years (1992-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
3 June 2014 in Nature Communications
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
HAHugo J. W. L. Aerts
Hugo J. W. L. Aerts
EVEmmanuel Rios Velazquez
Emmanuel Rios Velazquez
RLRalph T. H. Leijenaar
Ralph T. H. Leijenaar
CPChintan Parmar
Chintan Parmar
PGPatrick Grossmann
Patrick Grossmann
Philippe LambinPhilippe Lambin
Philippe Lambin
Human cancers exhibit strong phenotypic differences that can be visualized noninvasively by medical imaging. Radiomics refers to the comprehensive quantification of tumour phenotypes by applying a large number of quantitative image features. Here we present a radiomic analysis of 440 features quantifying tumour image intensity, shape and texture, which are extracted from computed tomography data of 1,019 patients with lung or head-and-neck cancer. We find that a large number of radiomic features have prognostic power in independent data sets of lung and head-and-neck cancer patients, many of which were not identified as significant before. Radiogenomics analysis reveals that a prognostic radiomic signature, capturing intratumour heterogeneity, is associated with underlying gene-expression patterns. These data suggest that radiomics identifies a general prognostic phenotype existing in both lung and head-and-neck cancer. This may have a clinical impact as imaging is routinely used in clinical practice, providing an unprecedented opportunity to improve decision-support in cancer treatment at low cost.

1 May 2020 in Radiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
AZAlex Zwanenburg
Alex Zwanenburg
MVMartin Vallières
Martin Vallières
MAMahmoud A. Abdalah
Mahmoud A. Abdalah
HAHugo J. W. L. Aerts
Hugo J. W. L. Aerts
VAVincent Andrearczyk
Vincent Andrearczyk
SLSteffen Löck
Steffen Löck
The Image Biomarker Standardization Initiative validated consensus-based reference values for 169 radiomics features, thus enabling calibration and verification of radiomics software. Background Radiomic features may quantify characteristics present in medical imaging. However, the lack of standardized definitions and validated reference values have hampered clinical use. Purpos...

1 November 2012 in Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
VKVirendra Kumar
Virendra Kumar
YGYuhua Gu
Yuhua Gu
SBSatrajit Basu
Satrajit Basu
ABAnders Berglund
Anders Berglund
SESteven A. Eschrich
Steven A. Eschrich
RGRobert Gillies
Robert Gillies

11 October 2016 in Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
James P B O'ConnorJames P B O'Connor
James P B O'Connor
EAEric Ofori Aboagye
Eric Ofori Aboagye
JAJudith E. Adams
Judith E. Adams
HAHugo J. W. L. Aerts
Hugo J. W. L. Aerts
SBSally F. Barrington
Sally F. Barrington
JWJohn C. Waterton
John C. Waterton
Imaging biomarkers (IBs) are used extensively in drug development and cancer research, but important differences exist between IBs and biospecimen-derived biomarkers. A tailored 'roadmap' is required for the development of new IBs to be used either in clinical research or for decision-making in healthcare. In this Consensus statement, a group of experts assembled by CRUK and the EORTC present 14 key recommendations for accelerating the clinical translation of IBs. Imaging biomarkers (IBs) are integral to the routine management of patients with cancer. IBs used daily in oncology include clinical TNM stage, objective response and left ventricular ejection fraction. Other CT, MRI, PET and ultrasonography biomarkers are used extensively in cancer research and drug development. New IBs need to be established either as useful tools for testing research hypotheses in clinical trials and research studies, or as clinical decision-making tools for use in healthcare, by crossing 'translational gaps' through validation and qualification. Important differences exist between IBs and biospecimen-derived biomarkers and, therefore, the development of IBs requires a tailored 'roadmap'. Recognizing this need, Cancer Research UK (CRUK) and the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) assembled experts to review, debate and summarize the challenges of IB validation and qualification. This consensus group has produced 14 key recommendations for accelerating the clinical translation of IBs, which highlight the role of parallel (rather than sequential) tracks of technical (assay) validation, biological/clinical validation and assessment of cost-effectiveness; the need for IB standardization and accreditation systems; the need to continually revisit IB precision; an alternative framework for biological/clinical validation of IBs; and the essential requirements for multicentre studies to qualify IBs for clinical use.

17 August 2015 in Scientific Reports
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
CPChintan Parmar
Chintan Parmar
PGPatrick Grossmann
Patrick Grossmann
JBJan Bussink
Jan Bussink
Philippe LambinPhilippe Lambin
Philippe Lambin
HAHugo J. W. L. Aerts
Hugo J. W. L. Aerts
Radiomics extracts and mines large number of medical imaging features quantifying tumor phenotypic characteristics. Highly accurate and reliable machine-learning approaches can drive the success of radiomic applications in clinical care. In this radiomic study, fourteen feature selection methods and twelve classification methods were examined in terms of their performance and stability for predicting overall survival. A total of 440 radiomic features were extracted from pre-treatment computed tomography (CT) images of 464 lung cancer patients. To ensure the unbiased evaluation of different machine-learning methods, publicly available implementations along with reported parameter configurations were used. Furthermore, we used two independent radiomic cohorts for training (n = 310 patients) and validation (n = 154 patients). We identified that Wilcoxon test based feature selection method WLCX (stability = 0.84 ± 0.05, AUC = 0.65 ± 0.02) and a classification method random forest RF (RSD = 3.52%, AUC = 0.66 ± 0.03) had highest prognostic performance with high stability against data perturbation. Our variability analysis indicated that the choice of classification method is the most dominant source of performance variation (34.21% of total variance). Identification of optimal machine-learning methods for radiomic applications is a crucial step towards stable and clinically relevant radiomic biomarkers, providing a non-invasive way of quantifying and monitoring tumor-phenotypic characteristics in clinical practice.

4 January 2010 in Journal of Clinical Investigation
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
KRKasper Rouschop
Kasper Rouschop
TBTwan van Den Beucken
Twan van Den Beucken
LDLudwig Dubois
Ludwig Dubois
HNHanneke Niessen
Hanneke Niessen
JBJan Bussink
Jan Bussink
BWBradly G. Wouters
Bradly G. Wouters
Tumor hypoxia is a common microenvironmental factor that adversely influences tumor phenotype and treatment response. Cellular adaptation to hypoxia occurs through multiple mechanisms, including activation of the unfolded protein response (UPR). Recent reports have indicated that hypoxia activates a lysosomal degradation pathway known as autophagy, and here we show that the UPR enhances the capacity of hypoxic tumor cells to carry out autophagy, and that this promotes their survival. In several human cancer cell lines, hypoxia increased transcription of the essential autophagy genes microtubule-associated protein 1 light chain 3β (MAP1LC3B) and autophagy-related gene 5 (ATG5) through the transcription factors ATF4 and CHOP, respectively, which are regulated by PKR-like ER kinase (PERK, also known as EIF2AK3). MAP1LC3B and ATG5 are not required for initiation of autophagy but mediate phagophore expansion and autophagosome formation. We observed that transcriptional induction of MAP1LC3B replenished MAP1LC3B protein that was turned over during extensive hypoxia-induced autophagy. Correspondingly, cells deficient in PERK signaling failed to transcriptionally induce MAP1LC3B and became rapidly depleted of MAP1LC3B protein during hypoxia. Consistent with these data, autophagy and MAP1LC3B induction occurred preferentially in hypoxic regions of human tumor xenografts. Furthermore, pharmacological inhibition of autophagy sensitized human tumor cells to hypoxia, reduced the fraction of viable hypoxic tumor cells, and sensitized xenografted human tumors to irradiation. Our data therefore demonstrate that the UPR is an important mediator of the hypoxic tumor microenvironment and that it contributes to resistance to treatment through its ability to facilitate autophagy.