Chloroplast genome sequencing is becoming a valuable process for developing several DNA barcodes. At present, plastid DNA barcode for systematics and evolution in flowering plant rely heavily on the use of non-coding genes. The present study was performed to verify the novelty and suitability of the two hotspot barcode plastid coding gene ycf1 and ndhF, to estimate the rate of molecular evolution in the Prunus genus at low taxonomic levels. Here, 25 chloroplast genomes of Prunus genus were selected for sequences annotation to search for the highly variable coding DNA barcode regions. Among them, 5 genera were of our own data, including the ornamental, cultivated, and wild haplotype, while 20 genera have been downloaded from the GenBank database. The results indicated that the two hotspot plastid gene ycf1 and ndhF were the most variable regions within the coding genes in Prunus with an average of 3268 to 3416 bp in length, which have been predicted to have the highest nucleotide diversity, with the overall transition/transversion bias (R = 1.06). The ycf1-ndhF structural domains showed a positive trend evident in structure variation among the 25 specimens tested, due to the variant overlap’s gene annotation and insertion or deletion with a broad trend of the full form of IGS sequence. As a result, the principal component analysis (PCA) and the ML tree data drew an accurate monophyletic annotations cluster in Prunus species, offering unambiguous identification without overlapping groups between peach, almond, and cherry. To this end, we put forward the domain of the two-locus ycf1-ndhF genes as the most promising coding plastid DNA barcode in P. persica at low taxonomic levels. We believe that the discovering of further variable loci with high evolutionary rates is extremely useful and potential uses as a DNA barcode in P. persica for further phylogeny study and species identification.

Adaptation to environmental changes is an important fitness trait for crop development. Photoperiod is an essential factor in seasonal control of flowering time. Sensing of day-length requires an interaction between the Photoperiod and the endogenous rhythms that is controlled by plant circadian clock. Thus, circadian clock is a critical regulator and internal molecular time-keeping mechanism, controlling key agricultural traits in crop plants such as the ability to adjust their growth and physiology to anticipate diurnal environmental changes. Here, we describe the gene Tomato Dof Daily Fluctuations 1 (TDDF1), which is involved in circadian regulation and stress resistance. Large daily oscillations in TDDF1 expression were retained after transferring to continuous dark (DD) or light (LL) conditions. Interestingly, overexpressing TDDF1 induce early flowering in tomato through up-regulation of the flowering-time control genes, moreover, by protein-protein interaction with the floral inducer SFT gene. Notably, overexpressing TDDF1 in tomato was associated with chlorophyll overaccumulation by up-regulating the related biosynthetic genes. TDDF1 expression results in improved drought, salt, various hormones stress tolerance alongwith resistance to late blight caused by Phytophthora infestans. This study can be a distinctive strategy to improve other economically important crops.

Peach (Prunus persica) is a climacteric fruit with a relatively short shelf life due to its fast ripening or softening process. Here, we report the association of gene families encoding ethylene insensitive-3 like (EIL) and ethylene response factor (ERF) with fruit ripening in peach. In total, 3 PpEILs and 12 PpERFs were highly expressed in fruit, with the majority showing a peak of expression at different stages. All three EILs could activate ethylene biosynthesis genes PpACS1 and PpACO1. One out of the 12 PpERFs, termed PpERF.E2, is a homolog of ripening-associated ERFs in tomato, with a consistently high expression throughout fruit development and an ability to activate PpACS1 and PpACO1. Additionally, four subgroup F PpERFs harboring the EAR repressive motif were able to repress the PpACO1 promoter but could also activate the PpACS1 promoter. Promoter deletion assay revealed that PpEILs and PpERFs could participate in transcriptional regulation of PpACS1 through either direct or indirect interaction with various cis-elements. Taken together, these results suggested that all three PpEILs and PpERF.E2 are candidates involved in ethylene biosynthesis, and EAR motif-containing PpERFs may function as activator or repressor of ethylene biosynthesis genes in peach. Our study provides an insight into the roles of EILs and ERFs in the fruit ripening process.