Spatially fractionated radiation therapy (SFRT) is a therapeutic approach with the potential to disrupt the classical paradigms of conventional radiation therapy. The high spatial dose modulation in SFRT activates distinct radiobiological mechanisms which lead to a remarkable increase in normal tissue tolerances. Several decades of clinical use and numerous preclinical experiments suggest that SFRT has the potential to increase the therapeutic index, especially in bulky and radioresistant tumors. To unleash the full potential of SFRT a deeper understanding of the underlying biology and its relationship with the complex dosimetry of SFRT is needed. This review provides a critical analysis of the field, discussing not only the main clinical and preclinical findings but also analyzing the main knowledge gaps in a holistic way.

(1) Background: Proton minibeam radiation therapy (pMBRT) is a new radiotherapy technique using spatially modulated narrow proton beams. pMBRT results in a significantly reduced local tissue toxicity while maintaining or even increasing the tumor control efficacy as compared to conventional radiotherapy in small animal experiments. In all the experiments performed up to date in tumor bearing animals, the dose was delivered in one single fraction. This is the first assessment on the impact of a temporal fractionation scheme on the response of glioma-bearing animals to pMBRT. (2) Methods: glioma-bearing rats were irradiated with pMBRT using a crossfire geometry. The response of the irradiated animals in one and two fractions was compared. An additional group of animals was also treated with conventional broad beam irradiations. (3) Results: pMBRT delivered in two fractions at the biological equivalent dose corresponding to one fraction resulted in the highest median survival time, with 80% long-term survivors free of tumors. No increase in local toxicity was noted in this group with respect to the other pMBRT irradiated groups. Conventional broad beam irradiations resulted in the most severe local toxicity. (4) Conclusion: Temporal fractionation increases the therapeutic index in pMBRT and could ease the path towards clinical trials.

Purpose: Proton minibeam radiation therapy (pMBRT) is a new radiotherapy approach that has shown a significant increase in the therapeutic window in glioma‐bearing rats compared to conventional proton therapy. The dosimetry of pMBRT is challenging and error prone due to the submillimetric beamlet sizes used. The aim of this study was to perform a robustness analysis on the setup parameters utilized in current preclinical trials and provide guidelines for reproducible dosimetry. The results of this work are intended to guide upcoming implementations of pMBRT worldwide, as well as pave the way for future clinical implementations.Methods: Monte Carlo simulations and experimental data were used to evaluate the impact of variations in setup parameters and uncertainties in collimator specifications on lateral pMBRT dose distributions. The value of each parameter was modified individually to evaluate their effect on dose distributions. Experimental dosimetry was performed by means of high‐resolution detectors, that is, radiochromic films, the IBA Razor and the Microdiamond detector. New guidelines were proposed to optimize the experimental setup in pMBRT studies and perform reproducible dosimetry.Results: The sensitivity of dose distributions to uncertainties and variations in setup parameters was quantified. Quantities that define pMBRT lateral profiles (i.e., the peak‐to‐valley dose ratio [PVDR], peak and valley doses, and peak width) are significantly influenced by small‐scale fluctuations in several of those parameters. The setup implemented at the Orsay proton therapy center for pMBRT irradiation was optimized to increase PVDRs and peak symmetry. In addition, we proposed guidelines to perform accurate and reproducible dosimetry in preclinical studies.Conclusions: This study revealed the importance of adopting guidelines and protocols tailored to the distinct dose delivery method and dose distributions in pMBRT. This new methodology leads to reproducible dosimetry, which is imperative in preclinical trials. The results and guidelines presented in this manuscript can ease the initiation of pMBRT investigations in other centers.

Objective . To propose a mathematical model for applying ionization detail (ID), the detailed spatial distribution of ionization along a particle track, to proton and ion beam radiotherapy treatment planning (RTP). Approach . Our model provides for selection of preferred ID parameters ( I _p ) for RTP, that associate closest to biological effects. Cluster dose is proposed to bridge the large gap between nanoscopic I _p and macroscopic RTP. Selection of I _p is demonstrated using published cell survival measurements for protons through argon, comparing results for nineteen I _p : N _k , k = 2, 3, …, 10, the number of ionizations in clusters of k or more per particle, and F _k , k = 1, 2, …, 10, the number of clusters of k or more per particle. We then describe application of the model to ID-based RTP and propose a path to clinical translation. Main results . The preferred I _p were N ₄ and F ₅ for aerobic cells, N ₅ and F ₇ for hypoxic cells. Significant differences were found in cell survival for beams having the same LET or the preferred N _k . Conversely, there was no significant difference for F ₅ for aerobic cells and F ₇ for hypoxic cells, regardless of ion beam atomic number or energy. Further, cells irradiated with the same cluster dose for these I _p had the same cell survival. Based on these preliminary results and other compelling results in nanodosimetry, it is reasonable to assert that I _p exist that are more closely associated with biological effects than current LET-based approaches and microdosimetric RBE-based models used in particle RTP. However, more biological variables such as cell line and cycle phase, as well as ion beam pulse structure and rate still need investigation. Significance . Our model provides a practical means to select preferred I _p from radiobiological data, and to convert I _p to the macroscopic cluster dose for particle RTP.

Treating radioresistant tumors like glioblastoma multiforme remains a challenge exacerbated by their immunosuppressive nature. Radiotherapy (RT) plays an immunomodulatory role, exerting both immunosuppressive and immunostimulatory effects. The nature of these effects depends on the total dose, dose per fraction, dose delivery method, and treatment length. Hypofractionation is observed to tip the balance toward immune stimulation. However, the use of hypofractionation is restricted in bulky tumors, such as gliomas, because of the high risk of toxicity. Therefore, finding new strategies leading to more favorable immune responses while reducing normal tissue toxicities could improve cancer treatment. In this study, we examine antitumoral immune responses to proton minibeam RT (pMBRT). Its immunomodulatory effects are not fully understood. To explore this, we conducted an in-depth characterization of the immune response to a curative dose of pMBRT in a preclinical orthotopic rat model of glioblastoma. Our findings revealed a close association between pMBRT and the immune response. pMBRT increased lymphocyte density in tumors more effectively than conventional proton therapy. Single-cell transcriptomics identified several immune cell types and unique transcriptional changes in tumor immune cells following pMBRT, including increased antibody production, chemotactic cytokine expression, and IFN responses. These results underscore the critical role of adaptive immunity, specifically T cells, in pMBRT's mechanism. The potential of pMBRT to trigger an antitumor immune response in a single RT session with minimal damage to healthy tissue makes it a promising candidate for future clinical trials and radioimmunotherapy combinations.

Background: Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) and stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) with conventional photon radiotherapy (XRT) are well-established treatment options for selected patients with oligometastatic/oligorecurrent disease. The use of PBT for SABR-SRS is attractive given the property of a lack of exit dose. The aim of this review is to evaluate the role and current utilisation of PBT in the oligometastatic/oligorecurrent setting. Methods: Using Medline and Embase, a comprehensive literature review was conducted following the PICO (Patients, Intervention, Comparison, and Outcomes) criteria, which returned 83 records. After screening, 16 records were deemed to be relevant and included in the review. Results: Six of the sixteen records analysed originated in Japan, six in the USA, and four in Europe. The focus was oligometastatic disease in 12, oligorecurrence in 3, and both in 1. Most of the studies analysed (12/16) were retrospective cohorts or case reports, two were phase II clinical trials, one was a literature review, and one study discussed the pros and cons of PBT in these settings. The studies presented in this review included a total of 925 patients. The metastatic sites analysed in these articles were the liver (4/16), lungs (3/16), thoracic lymph nodes (2/16), bone (2/16), brain (1/16), pelvis (1/16), and various sites in 2/16. Conclusions: PBT could represent an option for the treatment of oligometastatic/oligorecurrent disease in patients with a low metastatic burden. Nevertheless, due to its limited availability, PBT has traditionally been funded for selected tumour indications that are defined as curable. The availability of new systemic therapies has widened this definition. This, together with the exponential growth of PBT capacity worldwide, will potentially redefine its commissioning to include selected patients with oligometastatic/oligorecurrent disease. To date, PBT has been used with encouraging results for the treatment of liver metastases. However, PBT could be an option in those cases in which the reduced radiation exposure to normal tissues leads to a clinically significant reduction in treatment-related toxicities.