A therapy that slows disease progression is the major unmet need in Parkinson's disease. In this double-blind trial, we examined the possibility that rasagiline has disease-modifying effects in Parkinson's disease. A total of 1176 subjects with untreated Parkinson's disease were randomly assigned to receive rasagiline (at a dose of either 1 mg or 2 mg per day) for 72 weeks (the early-start group) or placebo for 36 weeks followed by rasagiline (at a dose of either 1 mg or 2 mg per day) for 36 weeks (the delayed-start group). To determine a positive result with either dose, the early-start treatment group had to meet each of three hierarchical end points of the primary analysis based on the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS, a 176-point scale, with higher numbers indicating more severe disease): superiority to placebo in the rate of change in the UPDRS score between weeks 12 and 36, superiority to delayed-start treatment in the change in the score between baseline and week 72, and noninferiority to delayed-start treatment in the rate of change in the score between weeks 48 and 72. Early-start treatment with rasagiline at a dose of 1 mg per day met all end points in the primary analysis: a smaller mean (±SE) increase (rate of worsening) in the UPDRS score between weeks 12 and 36 (0.09±0.02 points per week in the early-start group vs. 0.14±0.01 points per week in the placebo group, P=0.01), less worsening in the score between baseline and week 72 (2.82±0.53 points in the early-start group vs. 4.52±0.56 points in the delayed-start group, P=0.02), and noninferiority between the two groups with respect to the rate of change in the UPDRS score between weeks 48 and 72 (0.085±0.02 points per week in the early-start group vs. 0.085±0.02 points per week in the delayed-start group, P<0.001). All three end points were not met with rasagiline at a dose of 2 mg per day, since the change in the UPDRS score between baseline and week 72 was not significantly different in the two groups (3.47±0.50 points in the early-start group and 3.11±0.50 points in the delayed-start group, P=0.60). Early treatment with rasagiline at a dose of 1 mg per day provided benefits that were consistent with a possible disease-modifying effect, but early treatment with rasagiline at a dose of 2 mg per day did not. Because the two doses were associated with different outcomes, the study results must be interpreted with caution. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00256204.)

Objective: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of the adenosine A_2A receptor antagonist istradefylline (KW-6002) in patients with levodopa-treated Parkinson’s disease (PD) with both motor fluctuations and peak-dose dyskinesias. Methods: This was a 12-week, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, exploratory study in which PD subjects with both motor fluctuations and peak-dose dyskinesias were randomized to treatment with placebo (n = 29), istradefylline up to 20 mg/day (n = 26), or istradefylline up to 40 mg/day (n = 28). There was no prespecified primary outcome measure, and 19 outcome variables were analyzed. Results: As assessed by home diaries, subjects assigned to istradefylline experienced a mean (± SE) reduction in the proportion of awake time spent in the “off” state of 7.1 ± 2.0% compared with an increase of 2.2 ± 2.7% in the placebo group (p = 0.008). There was a decrease in “off” time of 1.2 ± 0.3 hours in the istradefylline group compared with an increase of 0.5 ± 0.5 hour in the placebo group (p = 0.004). Dyskinesia severity was unchanged, but “on” time with dyskinesia increased in the istradefylline group compared with the placebo group (percent, p = 0.002; hours, p = 0.001). No differences were observed in change in Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale scores or Clinical Global Impression of Change. Twenty-four percent of placebo-assigned subjects and 20% of istradefylline-assigned subjects withdrew from the study. Both dose regimens of istradefylline were generally well tolerated, and nausea was the most common adverse event. Conclusion: Istradefylline was generally well tolerated and reduced “off” time as assessed by home diaries. Severity of dyskinesia was unchanged, but “on” time with dyskinesia increased.

Background and Objectives To review the current evidence on the options available for initiating dopaminergic treatment of motor symptoms in early-stage Parkinson disease and provide recommendations to clinicians. Methods A multidisciplinary panel developed practice recommendations, integrating findings from a systematic review and following an Institute of Medicine–compliant process to ensure transparency and patient engagement. Recommendations were supported by structured rationales, integrating evidence from the systematic review, related evidence, principles of care, and inferences from evidence. Results Initial treatment with levodopa provides superior motor benefit compared to treatment with dopamine agonists, whereas levodopa is more likely than dopamine agonists to cause dyskinesia. The comparison of different formulations of dopamine agonists yielded little evidence that any one formulation or method of administration is superior. Long-acting forms of levodopa and levodopa with entacapone do not appear to differ in efficacy from immediate-release levodopa for motor symptoms in early disease. There is a higher risk of impulse control disorders associated with the use of dopamine agonists than levodopa. Recommendations on initial therapy for motor symptoms are provided to assist the clinician and patient in choosing between treatment options and to guide counseling, prescribing, and monitoring of efficacy and safety.

Levodopa has been the mainstay of treatment for Parkinson’s disease (PD) for more than 40 years. During this time, researchers have strived to optimize levodopa formulations to minimize side effects, enhance central nervous system (CNS) bioavailability, and achieve stable therapeutic plasma levels. Current strategies include concomitant treatment with inhibitors of dopa decarboxylase (DDC) and catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT) to prolong the peripheral levodopa half-life and increase CNS bioavailability. Levodopa combined with DDC inhibition is the current standard method of delivering levodopa for symptomatic treatment of PD. Recent research suggests that continuous dopaminergic stimulation that more closely approximates physiological stimulation may delay or prevent the development of motor fluctuations (‘wearing off’) and dyskinesias. Strategies currently being used to achieve more continuous dopaminergic stimulation include the combination of an oral levodopa/DDC inhibitor with a COMT inhibitor and the enteral infusion of a levodopa gel formulation. Attempts are underway to develop oral and transdermal very long-acting levodopa preparations.