DNA replication forks are intrinsically asymmetric and may arrest during the cell cycle upon encountering modifications in the DNA. We have studied real time dynamics of three DNA polymerases and an exonuclease at a single molecule level in the bacterium Bacillus subtilis. PolC and DnaE work in a symmetric manner and show similar dwell times. After addition of DNA damage, their static fractions and dwell times decreased, in agreement with increased re-establishment of replication forks. Only a minor fraction of replication forks showed a loss of active polymerases, indicating relatively robust activity during DNA repair. Conversely, PolA, homolog of polymerase I and exonuclease ExoR were rarely present at forks during unperturbed replication but were recruited to replications forks after induction of DNA damage. Protein dynamics of PolA or ExoR were altered in the absence of each other during exponential growth and during DNA repair, indicating overlapping functions. Purified ExoR displayed exonuclease activity and preferentially bound to DNA having 5′ overhangs in vitro. Our analyses support the idea that two replicative DNA polymerases work together at the lagging strand whilst only PolC acts at the leading strand, and that PolA and ExoR perform inducible functions at replication forks during DNA repair.

Type IV CRISPR–Cas (clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats and CRISPR-associated proteins) effector complexes are often encoded on plasmids and are proposed to prevent the replication of competing plasmids. The Type IV-A1 CRISPR–Cas system of Pseudomonas oleovorans additionally harbors a CRISPR RNA (crRNA) that tightly regulates the transcript levels of a chromosomal target and represents a natural CRISPR interference (CRISPRi) tool. This study investigates CRISPRi effects of this system using synthetic crRNAs against genome and plasmid sequences. Targeting of reporter genes revealed extended interference in P. oleovorans and Escherichia coli cells producing recombinant CRISPR ribonucleoprotein (crRNP) complexes. RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) analyses of Type IV-A1 CRISPRi-induced transcriptome alterations demonstrated highly effective long-range downregulation of histidine operon expression, whereas CRISPRi effects of dCas9 remained limited to the vicinity of its binding site. Single-molecule microscopy uncovered the localization dynamics of crRNP complexes. The tracks of fluorescently labeled crRNPs co-localized with regions of increased plasmid replication, supporting efficient plasmid targeting. These results identify mechanistic principles that facilitate the application of Type IV-A1 CRISPRi for the regulation of gene expression and plasmid replication.

Proteins with a catalytically inactive LytM-type endopeptidase domain are important regulators of cell wall-degrading enzymes in bacteria. Here, we study their representative DipM, a factor promoting cell division in Caulobacter crescentus. We show that the LytM domain of DipM interacts with multiple autolysins, including the soluble lytic transglycosylases SdpA and SdpB, the amidase AmiC and the putative carboxypeptidase CrbA, and stimulates the activities of SdpA and AmiC. Its crystal structure reveals a conserved groove, which is predicted to represent the docking site for autolysins by modeling studies. Mutations in this groove indeed abolish the function of DipM in vivo and its interaction with AmiC and SdpA in vitro. Notably, DipM and its targets SdpA and SdpB stimulate each other’s recruitment to midcell, establishing a self-reinforcing cycle that gradually increases autolytic activity as cytokinesis progresses. DipM thus coordinates different peptidoglycan-remodeling pathways to ensure proper cell constriction and daughter cell separation.

DNA helicases of the RecD2 family are ubiquitous. Bacillus subtilis RecD2 in association with the single-stranded binding protein SsbA may contribute to replication fork progression, but its detailed action remains unknown. In this work, we explore the role of RecD2 during DNA replication and its interaction with the RecA recombinase. RecD2 inhibits replication restart, but this effect is not observed in the absence of SsbA. RecD2 slightly affects replication elongation. RecA inhibits leading and lagging strand synthesis, and RecD2, which physically interacts with RecA, counteracts this negative effect. In vivo results show that recD2 inactivation promotes RecA–ssDNA accumulation at low mitomycin C levels, and that RecA threads persist for a longer time after induction of DNA damage. In vitro, RecD2 modulates RecA-mediated DNA strand-exchange and catalyzes branch migration. These findings contribute to our understanding of how RecD2 may contribute to overcome a replicative stress, removing RecA from the ssDNA and, thus, it may act as a negative modulator of RecA filament growth.

RarA is a widely conserved protein proposed to be involved in recombination-dependent replication. We present a cell biological approach to identify functional connections between RarA and other proteins using single molecule tracking. We found that 50% of RarA molecules were static, mostly close to replication forks and likely DNA-bound, while the remaining fraction was highly dynamic throughout the cells. RarA alternated between static and dynamic states. Exposure to H₂O₂ increased the fraction of dynamic molecules, but not treatment with mitomycin C or with methyl methanesulfonate, which was exacerbated by the absence of RecJ, RecD2, RecS and RecU proteins. The ratio between static and dynamic RarA also changed in replication temperature-sensitive mutants, but in opposite manners, dependent upon inhibition of DnaB or of DnaC (pre)primosomal proteins, revealing an intricate function related to DNA replication restart. RarA likely acts in the context of collapsed replication forks, as well as in conjunction with a network of proteins that affect the activity of the RecA recombinase. Our novel approach reveals intricate interactions of RarA, and is widely applicable for in vivo protein studies, to underpin genetic or biochemical connections, and is especially helpful for investigating proteins whose absence does not lead to any detectable phenotype.