Simon D. Tran

Prof. Dr. Simon D. Tran

McGill Craniofacial Tissue Engineering and Stem Cells Laboratory, Faculty of Dentistry, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

23Years (2004-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
12 October 2019 in Materials
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SMSomasundar Mantha
Somasundar Mantha
Sangeeth PillaiSangeeth Pillai
Sangeeth Pillai
PKParisa Khayambashi
Parisa Khayambashi
AUAkshaya Upadhyay
Akshaya Upadhyay
YZYuli Zhang
Yuli Zhang
STSimon D. Tran
Simon D. Tran
The field of regenerative medicine has tremendous potential for improved treatment outcomes and has been stimulated by advances made in bioengineering over the last few decades. The strategies of engineering tissues and assembling functional constructs that are capable of restoring, retaining, and revitalizing lost tissues and organs have impacted the whole spectrum of medicine and health care. Techniques to combine biomimetic materials, cells, and bioactive molecules play a decisive role in promoting the regeneration of damaged tissues or as therapeutic systems. Hydrogels have been used as one of the most common tissue engineering scaffolds over the past two decades due to their ability to maintain a distinct 3D structure, to provide mechanical support for the cells in the engineered tissues, and to simulate the native extracellular matrix. The high water content of hydrogels can provide an ideal environment for cell survival, and structure which mimics the native tissues. Hydrogel systems have been serving as a supportive matrix for cell immobilization and growth factor delivery. This review outlines a brief description of the properties, structure, synthesis and fabrication methods, applications, and future perspectives of smart hydrogels in tissue engineering.

1 January 2016 in Journal of Oral Biology and Craniofacial Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MJMohammad A. Javaid
Mohammad A. Javaid
AAAhad S. Ahmed
Ahad S. Ahmed
RDRobert Durand
Robert Durand
STSimon D. Tran
Simon D. Tran

27 March 2023 in Current Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Mohammed BadwelanMohammed Badwelan
Mohammed Badwelan
HMHasan Ahmed Muaddi
Hasan Ahmed Muaddi
AAAbeer Ahmed
Abeer Ahmed
KLKyungjun T. Lee
Kyungjun T. Lee
STSimon D. Tran
Simon D. Tran
Head and neck cancer is among the top ten cancers worldwide, with most lesions in the oral cavity. Oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) accounts for more than 90% of all oral malignancies and is a significant public health concern. Patients with OSCC are at increased risk for developing concomitant tumors, especially in the oral cavity, due to widely genetically susceptible mucosa to carcinogenic factors. Based on fulfilling specific criteria, these concomitant tumors can be called second primary tumors (SPTs), which can be further categorized into metachronous and synchronous tumors. This research reviews the literature that investigated the concurrent OSCC with second or multiple primaries to improve understanding of the definition, classification guidelines, and its effect on cancer survival. It also highlights the current investigation methods, the variation of standard treatment approaches due to such a phenomenon, and preventive measures discussed in the literature.

Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
PKParisa Khayambashi
Parisa Khayambashi
JIJanaki Iyer
Janaki Iyer
Sangeeth PillaiSangeeth Pillai
Sangeeth Pillai
AUAkshaya Upadhyay
Akshaya Upadhyay
YZYuli Zhang
Yuli Zhang
STSimon D. Tran
Simon D. Tran
Tissue engineering has been an inveterate area in the field of regenerative medicine for several decades. However, there remains limitations to engineer and regenerate tissues. Targeted therapies using cell-encapsulated hydrogels, such as mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), are capable of reducing inflammation and increasing the regenerative potential in several tissues. In addition, the use of MSC-derived nano-scale secretions (i.e., exosomes) has been promising. Exosomes originate from the multivesicular division of cells and have high therapeutic potential, yet neither self-replicate nor cause auto-immune reactions to the host. To maintain their biological activity and allow a controlled release, these paracrine factors can be encapsulated in biomaterials. Among the different types of biomaterials in which exosome infusion is exploited, hydrogels have proven to be the most user-friendly, economical, and accessible material. In this paper, we highlight the importance of MSCs and MSC-derived exosomes in tissue engineering and the different biomaterial strategies used in fabricating exosome-based biomaterials, to facilitate hard and soft tissue engineering.

4 January 2021 in Polymers
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Sangeeth PillaiSangeeth Pillai
Sangeeth Pillai
AUAkshaya Upadhyay
Akshaya Upadhyay
PKParisa Khayambashi
Parisa Khayambashi
IMRAN FAROOQIMRAN FAROOQ
IMRAN FAROOQ
HSHisham Sabri
Hisham Sabri
STSimon D. Tran
Simon D. Tran
The rise of three-dimensional (3D) printing technology has changed the face of dentistry over the past decade. 3D printing is a versatile technique that allows the fabrication of fully automated, tailor-made treatment plans, thereby delivering personalized dental devices and aids to the patients. It is highly efficient, reproducible, and provides fast and accurate results in an affordable manner. With persistent efforts among dentists for refining their practice, dental clinics are now acclimatizing from conventional treatment methods to a fully digital workflow to treat their patients. Apart from its clinical success, 3D printing techniques are now employed in developing haptic simulators, precise models for dental education, including patient awareness. In this narrative review, we discuss the evolution and current trends in 3D printing applications among various areas of dentistry. We aim to focus on the process of the digital workflow used in the clinical diagnosis of different dental conditions and how they are transferred from laboratories to clinics. A brief outlook on the most recent manufacturing methods of 3D printed objects and their current and future implications are also discussed.

Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
UCUyen M.N. Cao
Uyen M.N. Cao
YZYuli Zhang
Yuli Zhang
JCJulie Chen
Julie Chen
DSDarren Sayson
Darren Sayson
Sangeeth PillaiSangeeth Pillai
Sangeeth Pillai
STSimon D. Tran
Simon D. Tran
Organ-on-A-chip (OoAC) devices are miniaturized, functional, in vitro constructs that aim to recapitulate the in vivo physiology of an organ using different cell types and extracellular matrix, while maintaining the chemical and mechanical properties of the surrounding microenvironments. From an end-point perspective, the success of a microfluidic OoAC relies mainly on the type of biomaterial and the fabrication strategy employed. Certain biomaterials, such as PDMS (polydimethylsiloxane), are preferred over others due to their ease of fabrication and proven success in modelling complex organ systems. However, the inherent nature of human microtissues to respond differently to surrounding stimulations has led to the combination of biomaterials ranging from simple PDMS chips to 3D-printed polymers coated with natural and synthetic materials, including hydrogels. In addition, recent advances in 3D printing and bioprinting techniques have led to the powerful combination of utilizing these materials to develop microfluidic OoAC devices. In this narrative review, we evaluate the different materials used to fabricate microfluidic OoAC devices while outlining their pros and cons in different organ systems. A note on combining the advances made in additive manufacturing (AM) techniques for the microfabrication of these complex systems is also discussed.