Salem Mtanios HAYAR

Prof. Salem Mtanios HAYAR

Lebanese University
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

10Years (2017-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 November 2017 in Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
HNHiba Noureddine
Hiba Noureddine
RHRouba Hage-Sleiman
Rouba Hage-Sleiman
BWBatoul Wehbi
Batoul Wehbi
HFHussein Fayyad-Kazan
Hussein Fayyad-Kazan
Salem Mtanios HAYARSalem Mtanios HAYAR
Salem Mtanios HAYAR
YEYolla ElMakhour
Yolla ElMakhour

22 February 2021 in Molecules
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Salem Mtanios HAYARSalem Mtanios HAYAR
Salem Mtanios HAYAR
RZRawan Zeitoun
Rawan Zeitoun
BMBritt Marianna Maestroni
Britt Marianna Maestroni
The QuEChERS method was applied to the determination of pesticide residues in vine (Vitis vinifera) leaves by LC-MSMS. The method was validated in-house for 33 pesticides representing 17 different chemical groups, that are most commonly used in grape production. Recoveries for the pesticides tested ranged from 75 to 104%, and repeatability and reproducibility relative standard deviations (RSDr% and RSDRw%) were less than 20%. The method was applied to the analysis of pesticide residues in 17 market brands of vine leaves processed according to three different preservation methods and sampled from the Lebanese market. Dried vine leaves were more contaminated with pesticide residues than those preserved in brine or stuffed vine leaves. The systemic fungicides were the most frequently detected among all the phytosanitary compounds usually applied to grape production. Brine-preserved and stuffed vine leaves contained lower concentrations of the residues but still contained a cocktail of different pesticides.

1 June 1997 in Chemosphere
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Salem Mtanios HAYARSalem Mtanios HAYAR
Salem Mtanios HAYAR
CMC. Munier-Lamy
C. Munier-Lamy
TCT. Chone
T. Chone
MSM. Schiavon
M. Schiavon

19 December 2019 in SN Applied Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
RZRawan Zeitoun
Rawan Zeitoun
Salem Mtanios HAYARSalem Mtanios HAYAR
Salem Mtanios HAYAR
LMLiliane Majed
Liliane Majed
KEKhaled El-Omari
Khaled El-Omari
SDSylvie Dousset
Sylvie Dousset


20 May 2025 in Microorganisms
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
FDFatima El Dana
Fatima El Dana
VDVanessa David
Vanessa David
RTRaphaëlle Tourdot-Maréchal
Raphaëlle Tourdot-Maréchal
Salem Mtanios HAYARSalem Mtanios HAYAR
Salem Mtanios HAYAR
MCMarie-Charlotte Colosio
Marie-Charlotte Colosio
herve alexandreherve alexandre
herve alexandre
Bioprotection in winemaking refers to the use of naturally occurring microorganisms—mainly non-Saccharomyces yeasts—to inhibit the growth of spoilage microbes and reduce the need for chemical preservatives like sulfur dioxide (SO2). Numerous studies have demonstrated the benefits of non-Saccharomyces as bioprotectants. However, the use of Saccharomyces cerevisiae as a bioprotectant has been studied very little. Furthermore, it can offer many advantages for the production of sulfite-free wines. To test if S. cerevisiae could be used in bioprotection, we compared the ability of different strains to inhibit the growth of Brettanomyces bruxellensis and Hanseniaspora uvarum. Among the strains tested, the S. cerevisiae Sc54 strain isolated from the vineyard of the Bekaa plain was selected. To investigate its mechanisms of action, we analyzed its metabolite production, including acetic acid and ethanol. Taking into account the low levels of these metabolites and the lack of similar inhibition patterns in media supplemented with acetic acid and ethanol, it appears that other factors contribute to its antagonistic properties. Nutrient competition was ruled out as a factor, as the growth inhibition of B. bruxellensis and H. uvarum occurred rapidly within the first 24 h of co-culture. In this study, we explored the role of the S. cerevisiae killer toxin (Sc54Kt) as a bioprotective agent against H. uvarum and B. bruxellensis spoilage yeasts. Purification procedures with ethanol allowed the extraction of Sc54Kt, yielding two concentrations (0.185 and 0.5 mg/mL). Remarkably, semi-purified Sc54Kt exhibited inhibitory effects at both concentrations under winemaking conditions, effectively controlling the growth and metabolic activity of the target spoilage yeasts. Overall, these findings demonstrate that S. cerevisiae Sc54 not only exerts a strong bioprotective effect but also contributes to improving the quality of wine. The results suggest that S. cerevisiae Sc54 is a promising bioprotective agent for mitigating spoilage yeasts in winemaking, offering a natural and effective alternative to conventional antimicrobial strategies.