Samer Karam

Dr. Samer Karam

University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

9Years (2018-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 July 2021 in Journal of Applied Science and Technology Trends
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Bashar AlsadikBashar Alsadik
Bashar Alsadik
SKSamer Karam
Samer Karam
Positioning is needed for many applications related to mapping and navigation, either in civilian or military domains. The significant developments in satellite-based techniques, sensors, telecommunications, computer hardware and software, image processing, etc. positively influenced solving the positioning problem efficiently and instantaneously. Accordingly, the mentioned development empowered the applications and advancement of autonomous navigation. One of the most interestingly developed positioning techniques is what is called in robotics Simultaneous Localization and Mapping (SLAM). The SLAM problem solution has witnessed a quick improvement in the last decades, either using active sensors like the RAdio Detection and Ranging (Radar) and Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) or passive sensors like cameras. Definitely, positioning and mapping is one of the main tasks for geomatics engineers, and therefore it's of high importance for them to understand the SLAM topic, which is not easy because of the huge documentation and algorithms available and the various SLAM solutions in terms of the mathematical models, complexity, the sensors used, and the type of applications. In this paper, a clear and simplified explanation of SLAM from a geometrical viewpoint is introduced, avoiding going into the complicated algorithmic details behind the presented techniques. In this way, a general overview of SLAM is presented, showing the relationship between its different components and stages, like the core part of the front-end and back-end, and their relation to the SLAM paradigm. Furthermore, we explain the major mathematical techniques of filtering and pose graph optimization, either using visual or LiDAR SLAM, and introduce a summary of the efficient contribution of deep learning to the SLAM problem. Finally, we address examples of some existing practical applications of SLAM in our reality.

13 April 2019 in Remote Sensing
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SKSamer Karam
Samer Karam
George VosselmanGeorge Vosselman
George Vosselman
MPMichael Peter
Michael Peter
SHSiavash Hosseinyalamdary
Siavash Hosseinyalamdary
Ville LehtolaVille Lehtola
Ville Lehtola
Indoor mobile mapping systems are important for a wide range of applications starting from disaster management to straightforward indoor navigation. This paper presents the design and performance of a low-cost backpack indoor mobile mapping system (ITC-IMMS) that utilizes a combination of laser range-finders (LRFs) to fully recover the 3D building model based on a feature-based simultaneous localization and mapping (SLAM) algorithm. Specifically, we use robust planar features. These are advantageous, because oftentimes the final representation of the indoor environment is wanted in a planar form, and oftentimes the walls in an indoor environment physically have planar shapes. In order to understand the potential accuracy of our indoor models and to assess the system’s ability to capture the geometry of indoor environments, we develop novel evaluation techniques. In contrast to the state-of-the-art evaluation methods that rely on ground truth data, our evaluation methods can check the internal consistency of the reconstructed map in the absence of any ground truth data. Additionally, the external consistency can be verified with the often available as-planned state map of the building. The results demonstrate that our backpack system can capture the geometry of the test areas with angle errors typically below 1.5° and errors in wall thickness around 1 cm. An optimal configuration for the sensors is determined through a set of experiments that makes use of the developed evaluation techniques.

14 November 2022 in Drones
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SKSamer Karam
Samer Karam
Francesco NexFrancesco Nex
Francesco Nex
BCBhanu Teja Chidura
Bhanu Teja Chidura
Norman KerleNorman Kerle
Norman Kerle
Unmanned aerial vehicles offer a safe and fast approach to the production of three-dimensional spatial data on the surrounding space. In this article, we present a low-cost SLAM-based drone for creating exploration maps of building interiors. The focus is on emergency response mapping in inaccessible or potentially dangerous places. For this purpose, we used a quadcopter microdrone equipped with six laser rangefinders (1D scanners) and an optical sensor for mapping and positioning. The employed SLAM is designed to map indoor spaces with planar structures through graph optimization. It performs loop-closure detection and correction to recognize previously visited places, and to correct the accumulated drift over time. The proposed methodology was validated for several indoor environments. We investigated the performance of our drone against a multilayer LiDAR-carrying macrodrone, a vision-aided navigation helmet, and ground truth obtained with a terrestrial laser scanner. The experimental results indicate that our SLAM system is capable of creating quality exploration maps of small indoor spaces, and handling the loop-closure problem. The accumulated drift without loop closure was on average 1.1% (0.35 m) over a 31-m-long acquisition trajectory. Moreover, the comparison results demonstrated that our flying microdrone provided a comparable performance to the multilayer LiDAR-based macrodrone, given the low deviation between the point clouds built by both drones. Approximately 85 % of the cloud-to-cloud distances were less than 10 cm.

3 August 2020 in ISPRS Annals of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SKSamer Karam
Samer Karam
Ville LehtolaVille Lehtola
Ville Lehtola
George VosselmanGeorge Vosselman
George Vosselman
In recent years, the importance of indoor mapping increased in a wide range of applications, such as facility management and mapping hazardous sites. The essential technique behind indoor mapping is simultaneous localization and mapping (SLAM) because SLAM offers suitable positioning estimates in environments where satellite positioning is not available. State-of-the-art indoor mobile mapping systems employ Visual-based SLAM or LiDAR-based SLAM. However, Visual-based SLAM is sensitive to textureless environments and, similarly, LiDAR-based SLAM is sensitive to a number of pose configurations where the geometry of laser observations is not strong enough to reliably estimate the six-degree-of-freedom (6DOF) pose of the system. In this paper, we present different strategies that utilize the benefits of the inertial measurement unit (IMU) in the pose estimation and support LiDAR-based SLAM in overcoming these problems. The proposed strategies have been implemented and tested using different datasets and our experimental results demonstrate that the proposed methods do indeed overcome these problems. We conclude that IMU observations increase the robustness of SLAM, which is expected, but also that the best reconstruction accuracy is obtained not with a blind use of all observations but by filtering the measurements with a proposed reliability measure. To this end, our results show promising improvements in reconstruction accuracy.

18 November 2021 in Journal of Applied Science and Technology Trends
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Bashar AlsadikBashar Alsadik
Bashar Alsadik
SKSamer Karam
Samer Karam
Positioning is a need for many applications related to mapping and navigation either in civilian or military domains. The significant developments in satellite-based techniques, sensors, telecommunications, computer hardware and software, image processing, etc. positively influenced to solve the positioning problem efficiently and instantaneously. Accordingly, the mentioned development empowered the applications and advancement of autonomous navigation. One of the most interesting developed positioning techniques is what is called in robotics as the Simultaneous Localization and Mapping SLAM. The SLAM problem solution has witnessed a quick improvement in the last decades either using active sensors like the RAdio Detection And Ranging (Radar) and Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) or passive sensors like cameras. Definitely, positioning and mapping is one of the main tasks for Geomatics engineers, and therefore it's of high importance for them to understand the SLAM topic which is not easy because of the huge documentation and algorithms available and the various SLAM solutions in terms of the mathematical models, complexity, the sensors used, and the type of applications. In this paper, a clear and simplified explanation is introduced about SLAM from a Geomatical viewpoint avoiding going into the complicated algorithmic details behind the presented techniques. In this way, a general overview of SLAM is presented showing the relationship between its different components and stages like the core part of the front-end and back-end and their relation to the SLAM paradigm. Furthermore, we explain the major mathematical techniques of filtering and pose graph optimization either using visual or LiDAR SLAM and introduce a summary of the deep learning efficient contribution to the SLAM problem. Finally, we address examples of some existing practical applications of SLAM in our reality.

17 May 2022 in ISPRS Annals of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SKSamer Karam
Samer Karam
Francesco NexFrancesco Nex
Francesco Nex
OKO. Karlsson
O. Karlsson
JRJ. Rydell
J. Rydell
EBE. Bilock
E. Bilock
NKN. Kerle
N. Kerle
The use of drones to explore indoor spaces has gained attention and popularity for disaster management and indoor navigation applications. In this paper we present the operations and mapping techniques of two drones that are different in terms of size, the sensors deployed, and the positioning and mapping techniques used. The first drone is a low-cost commercial quadcopter microdrone, a Crazyflie, while the second drone is a relatively expensive research quadcopter macrodrone, called MAX. We investigated their feasibility in mapping areas where satellite positioning is not available, such as indoor spaces. We compared the point clouds obtained by a multi-ranger deck, a multi-layer LIDAR scanner and a stereo camera, and assessed each against ground truth obtained with a terrestrial laser scanner. Results showed that both drones are capable of mapping relatively cluttered indoor environments and can provide point clouds that are sufficient for a quick exploration. Furthermore, the LIDAR scanner-based system can handle a relatively large office environment with an accumulated drift less than 0.02% (1 cm) on the Z-axis and 0.77% (50 cm) on the X and Y axes over a length trajectory of about 65 m. Despite the limited features of the sensor configuration of the Crazyflie, its performance is promising for mapping indoor spaces, given the relatively low deviation from the ground truth: cloud-to-cloud distances measured were generally less than 20 cm.