Samuel Muhula

Dr. Samuel Muhula

Monitoring, Evaluation and Learning, Amref Health Africa, Nairobi, Nairobi City, Kenya

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

12Years (2015-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
30 January 2017 in JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
AKAbdul Momin Kazi
Abdul Momin Kazi
JCJason-Louis Carmichael
Jason-Louis Carmichael
GHGalgallo Waqo Hapanna
Galgallo Waqo Hapanna
PWPatrick Gikaria Wang'Oo
Patrick Gikaria Wang'Oo
SKSarah Karanja
Sarah Karanja
RLRichard Todd Lester
Richard Todd Lester
A multidisciplinary journal that focuses on public health and technology, public health informatics, mass media campaigns, surveillance, and innovation in public health practice and research. Also dedicated to rapid open data sharing during epidemics.

3 January 2018 in BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SKSarah Karanja
Sarah Karanja
RGRichard Gichuki
Richard Gichuki
PIPatrick Igunza
Patrick Igunza
SMSamuel Muhula
Samuel Muhula
POPeter Ofware
Peter Ofware
DODavid Ojakaa
David Ojakaa
In response to poor maternal, newborn, and child health indicators in Magadi sub-county, the “Boma” model was launched to promote health facility delivery by establishing community health units and training community health volunteers (CHVs) and traditional birth attendants (TBAs) as safe motherhood promoters. As a result, health facility delivery increased from 14% to 24%, still considerably below the national average (61%). We therefore conducted this study to determine factors influencing health facility delivery and describe barriers and motivators to the same. A mixed methods cross-sectional study involving a survey with 200 women who had delivered in the last 24 months, 3 focus group discussions with health providers, chiefs and CHVs and 26 in-depth interviews with mothers, key decision influencers and TBAs. Adjusted odds ratios (aOR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) using logistic regression were calculated to identify predictive factors for health facility delivery. Thematic analysis was done to describe barriers and motivators to the same. Of the women interviewed, 39% delivered at the health facility. Factors positively associated with health facility deliveries included belonging to the highest wealth quintiles [aOR 4.9 (95%CI 1.5–16.5)], currently not married [aOR 2.4 (95%CI 1.1–5.4)] and living near the health facility [aOR 2.2 (95%CI 1.1 = 4.4)]. High parity [aOR 0.7 (95%CI 0.5–0.9)] was negatively associated with health facility delivery. Barriers to health facility delivery included women not being final decision makers on place of birth, lack of a birth plan, gender of health provider, unfamiliar birthing position, disrespect and/or abuse, distance, attitude of health providers and lack of essential drugs and supplies. Motivators included proximity to health facility, mother’s health condition, integration of TBAs into the health system, and health education/advice received. Belonging to the highest wealth quintile, currently not married and living near a health facility were positively associated with health facility delivery. Gender inequity and cultural practices such as lack of birth preparedness should be addressed. Transport mechanisms need to be established to avoid delay in reaching a health facility. The health systems also need to be functional with adequate supplies and motivated staff.

PMPeter Memiah
Peter Memiah
FWFernando Antonio Wagner
Fernando Antonio Wagner
RKRobert Kimathi
Robert Kimathi
NANaomi Idah Anyango
Naomi Idah Anyango
SKSamuel Kiogora
Samuel Kiogora
LOLillian Otiso
Lillian Otiso
Studies including adolescents and young people (AYP) enhance the relevance of research results, benefit stakeholders, and inform future research. There exists a mental health gap in services for AYP living in low and middle-income countries. This study aims to identify mental health challenges faced by adolescents and young people in Kenya, develop practical recommendations to mitigate these issues, and reduce the mental health burden among this population. We convened an AYP-led meeting that involved 41 participants. The meeting objectives were to (1) identify efforts to support existing national and regional strategic priorities and review goals for addressing mental health needs among AYPs, (2) develop immediate action plans for strengthened mental health services, (3) review and strengthen country-level coordination mechanisms, and (4) identify how participating county experiences can inform mental health services in Kenya. Ministry of Health (MoH) officials from national and county levels, academic experts, and implementing partner agencies involved in mental health services participated in the meeting. The team, including AYP representatives, identified various mental health challenges among the AYA and recommended interventions aimed towards improving their mental health situation in the country. The challenges were clustered into three themes and comprehensively reviewed to establish the precipitating factors to mental health outcomes among AYPs in Kenya and provide recommendations. The themes included (1) legislative, (2) service provider/Ministry of Health, and (3) adolescent/individual-level factors. To bridge the mental health gap in the country and scale up mental health outcomes, the stakeholders recommended interventions within the context of the three clusters. The key suggestions included an increase in insurance financing, acceleration of community health interventions, the establishment of adolescent-friendly spaces, the training of adolescent youth champions, interactive service provision models, implementation of the existing mental health policies and structures, the development of comprehensive assessment tools, well equipped mental health departments in health facilities, the enhancement of telehealth services and digital villages, the mobilization of a functional mental health response team, and the development of a mental health database.

SMSamuel Muhula
Samuel Muhula
YOYvonne Opanga
Yvonne Opanga
VOViolet Oramisi
Violet Oramisi
CNCatherine Ngugi
Catherine Ngugi
CNCarol Ngunu
Carol Ngunu
PMPeter Memiah
Peter Memiah
The study sought to determine the impact of COVID-19 on HIV/AIDS programming in the Kibera informal settlement and COVID-19 hotspot counties during the first wave of the pandemic. The study was conducted in two phases. The first phase entailed the analysis of HIV care and treatment secondary data (2018–2020) from the Kenya Health Information System. In the second phase, a prospective cohort study was conducted among people living with HIV in the Kibera informal settlement. A total of 176 participants aged 18 years and above accessing HIV services at selected healthcare facilities in Kibera were randomly sampled from facility electronic medical records and followed up for three months. Socio-demographics and contact details were abstracted from the records and telephone interviews were conducted with consenting participants. Results from the retrospective review of HIV program data indicated a 56% (p < 0.000, 95% CI: 31.3%–62.8%) reduction in uptake of HIV services. Clients starting antiretroviral therapy (ART) reduced significantly by 48% (p < 0.001, 95% CI: 35.4%–77%) in hotspot counties. However, pre-exposure prophylaxis uptake increased significantly by 24% (p < 0.019, 95% CI: 4%–49%). In Kibera, 14% reported missing medications at the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic because of lack of food (38%) and government measures (11%), which affected ART access; 11% did not access health facilities due to fear of contracting COVID-19, government regulations and lack of personal protective equipment. Socioeconomic factors, food insecurity and government measures affected uptake of HIV/AIDS services; hence, the need for scaling up measures to increase access to HIV/AIDS services during the onset of pandemics.

9 February 2022 in PLOS ONE
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SMSamuel Muhula
Samuel Muhula
JGJohn Gachohi
John Gachohi
YKYeri Kombe
Yeri Kombe
SKSimon Karanja
Simon Karanja
Background: Several interventions to improve long term retention (12 months and above) on treatment have been rigorously evaluated in Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). However, research on interventions to improve retention of patients in the early stages of treatment (6 months) during this era of Universal Test and Treat has only recently emerged. The aim of this study is to systematically map evidence of interventions used to improve early retention of patients in antiretroviral therapy (ART) programmes in SSA.Methods: We searched PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane electronic databases to identify studies describing interventions aimed at improving early retention in ART treatment. We applied the methodological frameworks by Arksey and O’Malley (2005) and Levac et al. (2010). We also followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) checklist. Interventions were categorized according to key broad areas in the existing literature.Results: A total of 2,241 articles were identified of which 19 met the inclusion criteria and were eligible for this review, with the majority either being randomized control trials 32% (n = 6) or cohort studies 32% (n = 6). The studies reviewed were conducted in 11 SSA countries. The most common interventions described under key broad areas included: Health system interventions such as Universal Test-and-Treat, integration of ART initiation, HIV Testing and Counselling and Antenatal Care services and reduction of ART drug costs; Patient centered approaches such as fast track ART initiation, Differentiated Drug Delivery models and point of care HIV birth testing; Behavioral interventions and support through lay counselors, mentor mothers, nurse counselors and application of quality improvement interventions and financial incentives. Majority of the studies targeted the HIV positive adults and pregnant women.Conclusion: With the introduction of Universal Test-and-Treat and same-day initiation of ART, findings suggest that adoption of policies that expand ART uptake with the goal of reducing HIV transmission at the population level, promoting patient centered approaches such as fast track ART initiation, Differentiated Service Delivery models and providing adequate support through Mentor Mothers, lay and nurse counselors may improve early retention in HIV care in SSA. However, these interventions have only been tested in few countries in the region which points to how hard evidence based HIV programming is. Further research investigating the impact of individual and a combination of interventions to improve early retention in HIV care, including for various groups at high risk of attrition, is warranted across SSA countries to fast track the achievement of 95-95-95 Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS) targets by 2030.

18 April 2016 in BMC Infectious Diseases
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MKMia Liisa van der Kop
Mia Liisa van der Kop
LTLehana Thabane
Lehana Thabane
PAPatricia Opondo Awiti
Patricia Opondo Awiti
SMSamuel Muhula
Samuel Muhula
LKLennie Bazira Kyomuhangi
Lennie Bazira Kyomuhangi
AEAnna Mia Ekström
Anna Mia Ekström
Presenting to care with advanced HIV is common in sub-Saharan Africa and increases the risk of severe disease and death; however, it remains unclear whether this is a consequence of late diagnosis or a delay in seeking care after diagnosis. The objectives of this cross-sectional study were to determine factors associated with advanced HIV at presentation to care and whether this was due to late diagnosis or delays in accessing care. Between 2013 and 2015, adults presenting to care were recruited at two clinics in low-income areas of Nairobi, Kenya. Participants were considered to have advanced HIV if their CD4 count was below 200 cells/μL, or they were in WHO stage 4. Information on previous HIV diagnoses was collected using interviewer-administered questionnaires. Logistic regression was used to determine the association between clinical and socio-demographic factors and advanced HIV. Of 753 participants presenting to HIV care, 248 (33 %) had advanced HIV. Almost 60 % (146/248) of those presenting with advanced HIV had been previously diagnosed, most of whom (102/145; 70 %) presented to care within three months of their initial diagnosis. The median time to presentation to HIV care after an initial diagnosis was 22 days (IQR 6-147) for those with advanced HIV, compared to 19 days (IQR 4-119) for those with non-advanced HIV (p = 0.716). Clinic (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 1.55, 95 % CI 1.09–2.20) and age (AOR 1.72 per unit increase in age category, 95 % CI 1.45–2.03) were associated with presenting with advanced HIV. Presentation to care with advanced HIV was primarily due to delayed diagnosis, rather than delayed linkage to care after diagnosis. Variation by clinic suggests that outreach and other community-based efforts may drive earlier testing and linkage to care. Our findings highlight the ongoing importance of implementing strategies to encourage earlier HIV diagnosis, particularly among adults 30 years and older.