Sankaran Sandhya

Dr. Sankaran Sandhya

Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, India
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

24Years (2003-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
16 April 2015 in BMC Bioinformatics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
TMTalha Bin Masood
Talha Bin Masood
SSSankaran Sandhya
Sankaran Sandhya
NCNagasuma Chandra
Nagasuma Chandra
VNVijay Natarajan
Vijay Natarajan
Understanding channel structures that lead to active sites or traverse the molecule is important in the study of molecular functions such as ion, ligand, and small molecule transport. Efficient methods for extracting, storing, and analyzing protein channels are required to support such studies. Further, there is a need for an integrated framework that supports computation of the channels, interactive exploration of their structure, and detailed visual analysis of their properties.

31 March 2009 in PLOS ONE
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SSSankaran Sandhya
Sankaran Sandhya
SRSaane Sudha Rani
Saane Sudha Rani
PBPankaj Barah
Pankaj Barah
MGMadabosse Kande Govind
Madabosse Kande Govind
BOBernard G. OFFMANN
Bernard G. OFFMANN
RSR. Sowdhamini
R. Sowdhamini
Related protein domains of a superfamily can be specified by proteins of diverse lengths. The structural and functional implications of indels in a domain scaffold have been examined. In this study, domain superfamilies with large length variations (more than 30% difference from average domain size, referred as ‘length-deviant’ superfamilies and ‘length-rigid’ domain superfamilies (<10% length difference from average domain size) were analyzed for the functional impact of such structural differences. Our delineated dataset, derived from an objective algorithm, enables us to address indel roles in the presence of peculiar structural repeats, functional variation, protein-protein interactions and to examine ‘domain contexts’ of proteins tolerant to large length variations. Amongst the top-10 length-deviant superfamilies analyzed, we found that 80% of length-deviant superfamilies possess distant internal structural repeats and nearly half of them acquired diverse biological functions. In general, length-deviant superfamilies have higher chance, than length-rigid superfamilies, to be engaged in internal structural repeats. We also found that ∼40% of length-deviant domains exist as multi-domain proteins involving interactions with domains from the same or other superfamilies. Indels, in diverse domain superfamilies, were found to participate in the accretion of structural and functional features amongst related domains. With specific examples, we discuss how indels are involved directly or indirectly in the generation of oligomerization interfaces, introduction of substrate specificity, regulation of protein function and stability. Our data suggests a multitude of roles for indels that are specialized for domain members of different domain superfamilies. These specialist roles that we observe and trends in the extent of length variation could influence decision making in modeling of new superfamily members. Likewise, the observed limits of length variation, specific for each domain superfamily would be particularly relevant in the choice of alignment length search filters commonly applied in protein sequence analysis.

31 July 2015 in Biology Direct
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
RMRicha Mudgal
Richa Mudgal
SSSankaran Sandhya
Sankaran Sandhya
NCNagasuma Chandra
Nagasuma Chandra
NSNarayanaswamy Srinivasan
Narayanaswamy Srinivasan
In the post-genomic era where sequences are being determined at a rapid rate, we are highly reliant on computational methods for their tentative biochemical characterization. The Pfam database currently contains 3,786 families corresponding to “Domains of Unknown Function” (DUF) or “Uncharacterized Protein Family” (UPF), of which 3,087 families have no reported three-dimensional structure, constituting almost one-fourth of the known protein families in search for both structure and function. We applied a ‘computational structural genomics’ approach using five state-of-the-art remote similarity detection methods to detect the relationship between uncharacterized DUFs and domain families of known structures. The association with a structural domain family could serve as a start point in elucidating the function of a DUF. Amongst these five methods, searches in SCOP-NrichD database have been applied for the first time. Predictions were classified into high, medium and low- confidence based on the consensus of results from various approaches and also annotated with enzyme and Gene ontology terms. 614 uncharacterized DUFs could be associated with a known structural domain, of which high confidence predictions, involving at least four methods, were made for 54 families. These structure-function relationships for the 614 DUF families can be accessed on-line at http://proline.biochem.iisc.ernet.in/RHD_DUFS/ . For potential enzymes in this set, we assessed their compatibility with the associated fold and performed detailed structural and functional annotation by examining alignments and extent of conservation of functional residues. Detailed discussion is provided for interesting assignments for DUF3050, DUF1636, DUF1572, DUF2092 and DUF659. This study provides insights into the structure and potential function for nearly 20 % of the DUFs. Use of different computational approaches enables us to reliably recognize distant relationships, especially when they converge to a common assignment because the methods are often complementary. We observe that while pointers to the structural domain can offer the right clues to the function of a protein, recognition of its precise functional role is still ‘non-trivial’ with many DUF domains conserving only some of the critical residues. It is not clear whether these are functional vestiges or instances involving alternate substrates and interacting partners. This article was reviewed by Drs Eugene Koonin, Frank Eisenhaber and Srikrishna Subramanian.

1 June 2019 in Journal of Biological Chemistry
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
HTHimani Tandon
Himani Tandon
ASArun Sharma
Arun Sharma
SWSaruchi Wadhwa
Saruchi Wadhwa
RVRaghavan Varadarajan
Raghavan Varadarajan
RSRamandeep Singh
Ramandeep Singh
SSSankaran Sandhya
Sankaran Sandhya
Mycobacterium tuberculosis possesses an unusually large representation of type II toxin–antitoxin (TA) systems, whose functions and targets are mostly unknown. To better understand the basis of their unique expansion and to probe putative functional similarities among these systems, here we computationally and experimentally investigated their sequence relationships. Bioinformatic and phylogenetic investigations revealed that 51 sequences of the VapBC toxin family group into paralogous sub-clusters. On the basis of conserved sequence fingerprints within paralogues, we predicted functional residues and residues at the putative TA interface that are useful to evaluate TA interactions. Substitution of these likely functional residues abolished the toxin's growth-inhibitory activity. Furthermore, conducting similarity searches in 101 mycobacterial and ∼4500 other prokaryotic genomes, we assessed the relative conservation of the M. tuberculosis TA systems and found that most TA orthologues are well-conserved among the members of the M. tuberculosis complex, which cause tuberculosis in animal hosts. We found that soil-inhabiting, free-living Actinobacteria also harbor as many as 12 TA pairs. Finally, we identified five novel putative TA modules in M. tuberculosis. For one of them, we demonstrate that overexpression of the putative toxin, Rv2514c, induces bacteriostasis and that co-expression of the cognate antitoxin Rv2515c restores bacterial growth. Taken together, our findings reveal that toxin sequences are more closely related than antitoxin sequences in M. tuberculosis. Furthermore, the identification of additional TA systems reported here expands the known repertoire of TA systems in M. tuberculosis.

31 October 2011 in PLOS ONE
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
PAPraveen Anand
Praveen Anand
SSSankaran Sandhya
Sankaran Sandhya
SMSumanta Mukherjee
Sumanta Mukherjee
KYKalidas Yeturu
Kalidas Yeturu
RLRoman Laskowski
Roman Laskowski
NCNagasuma Chandra
Nagasuma Chandra
Of the ∼4000 ORFs identified through the genome sequence of Mycobacterium tuberculosis (TB) H37Rv, experimentally determined structures are available for 312. Since knowledge of protein structures is essential to obtain a high-resolution understanding of the underlying biology, we seek to obtain a structural annotation for the genome, using computational methods. Structural models were obtained and validated for ∼2877 ORFs, covering ∼70% of the genome. Functional annotation of each protein was based on fold-based functional assignments and a novel binding site based ligand association. New algorithms for binding site detection and genome scale binding site comparison at the structural level, recently reported from the laboratory, were utilized. Besides these, the annotation covers detection of various sequence and sub-structural motifs and quaternary structure predictions based on the corresponding templates. The study provides an opportunity to obtain a global perspective of the fold distribution in the genome. The annotation indicates that cellular metabolism can be achieved with only 219 folds. New insights about the folds that predominate in the genome, as well as the fold-combinations that make up multi-domain proteins are also obtained. 1728 binding pockets have been associated with ligands through binding site identification and sub-structure similarity analyses. The resource (http://proline.physics.iisc.ernet.in/Tbstructuralannotation), being one of the first to be based on structure-derived functional annotations at a genome scale, is expected to be useful for better understanding of TB and for application in drug discovery. The reported annotation pipeline is fairly generic and can be applied to other genomes as well.

11 October 2018 in PLOS ONE
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SSSankaran Sandhya
Sankaran Sandhya
AMAditi Maulik
Aditi Maulik
MGMalyasree Giri
Malyasree Giri
MSMahavir Singh
Mahavir Singh
BAF250a and BAF250b are subunits of the SWI/SNF chromatin-remodeling complex that recruit the complex to chromatin allowing transcriptional activation of several genes. Despite being the central subunits of the SWI/SNF complex, the structural and functional annotation of BAF250a/b remains poorly understood. BAF250a (nearly 2200 residues protein) harbors an N-terminal DNA binding ARID (~110 residues) and a C-terminal folded region (~250 residues) of unknown structure and function, recently annotated as BAF250_C. Using hydrophobic core analysis, fold prediction and comparative modeling, here we have defined a domain boundary and associate a β-catenin like ARM-repeat fold to the C-terminus of BAF250a that encompass BAF250_C. The N-terminal DNA-binding ARID is found in diverse domain combinations in proteins imparting unique functions. We used a comparative sequence analysis based approach to study the ARIDs from diverse domain contexts and identified conserved residue positions that are important to preserve its core structure. Supporting this, mutation of one such conserved residue valine, at position 1067, to glycine, resulted in destabilization, loss of structural integrity and DNA binding affinity of ARID. Additionally, we identified a set of conserved and surface-exposed residues unique to the ARID when it co-occurs with the ARM repeat containing BAF250_C in BAF250a. Several of these residues are found mutated in somatic cancers. We predict that these residues in BAF250a may play important roles in mediating protein-DNA and protein-protein interactions in the BAF complex.