Sarah Woolner

Dr. Sarah Woolner

University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

27Years (2000-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
28 October 2002 in Nature Cell Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
WWWilliam Wood
William Wood
AJAntonio Jacinto
Antonio Jacinto
Richard Philip GroseRichard Philip Grose
Richard Philip Grose
Sarah WoolnerSarah Woolner
Sarah Woolner
JGJonathan Gale
Jonathan Gale
PMPaul Martin
Paul Martin

1 July 2002 in Developmental Cell
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
AJAntonio Jacinto
Antonio Jacinto
Sarah WoolnerSarah Woolner
Sarah Woolner
PMPaul Martin
Paul Martin

7 July 2008 in Journal of Cell Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
Sarah WoolnerSarah Woolner
Sarah Woolner
LOLori L. O'Brien
Lori L. O'Brien
CWChristiane Wiese
Christiane Wiese
WBWilliam M. Bement
William M. Bement
Mitotic spindles are microtubule-based structures responsible for chromosome partitioning during cell division. Although the roles of microtubules and microtubule-based motors in mitotic spindles are well established, whether or not actin filaments (F-actin) and F-actin–based motors (myosins) are required components of mitotic spindles has long been controversial. Based on the demonstration that myosin-10 (Myo10) is important for assembly of meiotic spindles, we assessed the role of this unconventional myosin, as well as F-actin, in mitotic spindles. We find that Myo10 localizes to mitotic spindle poles and is essential for proper spindle anchoring, normal spindle length, spindle pole integrity, and progression through metaphase. Furthermore, we show that F-actin localizes to mitotic spindles in dynamic cables that surround the spindle and extend between the spindle and the cortex. Remarkably, although proper anchoring depends on both F-actin and Myo10, the requirement for Myo10 in spindle pole integrity is F-actin independent, whereas F-actin and Myo10 actually play antagonistic roles in maintenance of spindle length.

1 July 2002 in Current Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
AJAntonio Jacinto
Antonio Jacinto
WWWilliam Wood
William Wood
Sarah WoolnerSarah Woolner
Sarah Woolner
CHCharlotte Hiley
Charlotte Hiley
LTLaura Turner
Laura Turner
PMPaul Martin
Paul Martin

1 June 2009 in Trends in Cell Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Sarah WoolnerSarah Woolner
Sarah Woolner
WBWilliam M. Bement
William M. Bement

1 February 2019 in Cell Reports
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
ANAlexander Nestor-Bergmann
Alexander Nestor-Bergmann
GSGeorgina A. Stooke-Vaughan
Georgina A. Stooke-Vaughan
GGGeorgina K. Goddard
Georgina K. Goddard
TSTobias Starborg
Tobias Starborg
OJOliver E. Jensen
Oliver E. Jensen
Sarah WoolnerSarah Woolner
Sarah Woolner
Distinct mechanisms involving cell shape and mechanical force are known to influence the rate and orientation of division in cultured cells. However, uncoupling the impact of shape and force in tissues remains challenging. Combining stretching of Xenopus tissue with mathematical methods of inferring relative mechanical stress, we find separate roles for cell shape and mechanical stress in orienting and cueing division. We demonstrate that division orientation is best predicted by an axis of cell shape defined by the position of tricellular junctions (TCJs), which align with local cell stress rather than tissue-level stress. The alignment of division to cell shape requires functional cadherin and the localization of the spindle orientation protein, LGN, to TCJs but is not sensitive to relative cell stress magnitude. In contrast, proliferation rate is more directly regulated by mechanical stress, being correlated with relative isotropic stress and decoupled from cell shape when myosin II is depleted.