We're building the foundations of the future - starting right now. Join, learn, and share your knowledge.

Study elucidates and compares the mitochondrial bioenergetic-related molecular basis of sevoflurane and propofol cardioprotection during aortic valve replacement surgery due to aortic valve stenosis. Twenty-two patients were prospectively randomized in two groups regarding the anesthetic regime: sevoflurane and propofol. Hemodynamic parameters, biomarkers of cardiac injury and brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) were measured preoperatively and postoperatively. In tissue samples, taken from the interventricular septum, key mitochondrial molecules were determined by Western blot, real time PCR, as well as confocal microscopy and immunohisto- and immunocyto-chemical analysis. The protein levels of cytochrome c oxidase and ATP synthase were higher in sevoflurane than in propofol group. Nevertheless, cytochrome c protein content was higher in propofol than sevoflurane receiving patients. Propofol group also showed higher protein level of connexin 43 (Cx43) than sevoflurane group. Besides, immunogold analysis showed its mitochondrial localization. The mRNA level of mtDNA and uncoupling protein (UCP2) were higher in propofol than sevoflurane patients, as well. On the other hand, there were no significant differences between groups in hemodynamic assessment, intensive care unit length of stay, troponin I and BNP level. Our data indicate that sevoflurane and propofol lead to cardiac protection via different mitochondrially related molecular mechanisms. It appears that sevoflurane acts regulating cytochrome c oxidase and ATP synthase, while the effects of propofol occur through regulation of cytochrome c, Cx43, mtDNA transcription and UCP2.

Cor triatriatum dexter is a rare congenital heart anomaly in which a membrane divides the right atrium into 2 chambers. We report the case of a 43-year-old woman who had cor triatriatum dexter and a large atrial septal defect. During attempted percutaneous closure, the balloon disrupted the membrane and revealed that the defect had no inferior rim, precluding secure placement of an Amplatzer Septal Occluder. Surgical treatment subsequently proved to be successful. In patients with an incomplete membrane and a septal defect with well-defined rims, percutaneous treatment can be the first choice. In patients who have cor triatriatum dexter and unfavorable anatomic features or concomitant complex heart anomalies, open-heart surgery remains the gold standard for treatment.

Concomitant carotid and cardiac surgery carries an increased perioperative morbidity and mortality risk. Whether the hybrid procedure of carotid artery stenting (CAS) and coronary bypass surgery decreases the risk of stroke and other complications is still unknown. The aim of this study was to assess early outcomes after simultaneous hybrid CAS and coronary bypass grafting versus open concomitant carotid and coronary bypass surgery. We included 20 patients in this study. According to the protocol, all the patients were divided into two groups: Group 1 (10 patients) with hybrid CAS and coronary bypass surgery and Group 2 (10 patients) with concomitant carotid and coronary surgery. Different preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative variables were compared. The primary end point was combined incidence of stroke and death 30 days after surgery or during initial hospitalization. The secondary end points were myocardial infarction, atrial fibrillation, blood loss and need for blood transfusion and duration of intensive care unit and hospital stay. Groups 1 and 2 were similar in preoperative characteristics including age (65.3 ± 6.8 vs 70.7 ± 7.0, P = 0.191) New York Heart Association class (2.3 ± 0.5 vs 1.8 ± 0.7, P = 0.218), EuroSCORE (2.8 ± 2.0 vs 3.6 ± 2.3, P = 0.547), the degree of carotid stenosis (79 ± 12 vs 87 ± 13%, P = 0.224) and average left ventricular ejection fraction (44.3 ± 12.4 vs 43.4 ± 13.3%, P = 0.896). Also, the groups did not differ in intraoperative variables with an exception of extracorporeal circulation time (65.7 ± 14.1 vs 90.0 + 17.4 min, P = 0.023), which was significantly shorter in Group 1. Although rare, and without significant difference, primary end point occurred only in Group 2 (1 stroke and 1 death, 20%). There was no difference in the duration of mechanical ventilation, need for transfusion and duration of intensive care unit and hospital stay between the two groups. Although limited by a small sample size, our results show that the hybrid procedure of carotid stenting and coronary surgery might be a good therapeutic option but further extended studies are needed to assess its real value.