Somayeh Delavari

Dr. Somayeh Delavari


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

14Years (2013-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
10 July 2019 in BMC Research Notes
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MHMohammad Reza Heydari
Mohammad Reza Heydari
FTFatemeh Taghva
Fatemeh Taghva
MAMitra Amini
Mitra Amini
SDSomayeh Delavari
Somayeh Delavari
Objectives: This study is designed to evaluate the effect of a workshop about new teaching and learning methods on the response, knowledge, and behavior of healthcare staff working a large city healthcare center. Results: Kirkpatrick’s program evaluation model showed that the workshop on new teaching and learning methods significantly improved the healthcare staff’s satisfaction about the teaching environment of workshops, their knowledge about new teaching and learning methods and their behavior in performing workshops for teaching people. It is recommended that this teaching and learning methods workshop should be considered in educational programs for healthcare staff. Trial registration Trial registration number: IRCT20180619040150N1 approved by Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials at 2018-07-27

25 October 2016 in Electronic Physiciane
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
SDSomayeh Delavari
Somayeh Delavari
HZHamed Zandian
Hamed Zandian
SRSatar Rezaei
Satar Rezaei
MMMehdi Moradinazar
Mehdi Moradinazar
SDSajjad Delavari
Sajjad Delavari
RFRazieh Fallah
Razieh Fallah
Life Expectancy and its Socioeconomic Determinants in Iran

15 March 2022 in BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MPMohammadreza Pourahmadi
Mohammadreza Pourahmadi
MSMohammad Sahebalam
Mohammad Sahebalam
JDJan Dommerholt
Jan Dommerholt
SDSomayeh Delavari
Somayeh Delavari
MBMohammad Ali Mohseni Bandpei
Mohammad Ali Mohseni Bandpei
MMMohammad Ali Mansournia
Mohammad Ali Mansournia
Spinopelvic alignment is increasingly considered as an essential factor for maintaining an energy-efficient posture in individuals with normal or pathological status. Although several previous studies have shown that changes in the sagittal spinopelvic alignment may occur in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA), no review of this area has been completed so far. Thus, the objective of this scoping review was to summarize the evidence investigating changes in spinopelvic alignment and low back pain (LBP) following THA. We adhered to the established methodology for scoping reviews. Four electronic databases were systematically searched from inception-December 31, 2021. We selected prospective or retrospective observational or intervention studies that included patients with THA. Data extraction and levels of evidence were independently performed using standardized checklists. A total of 45 papers were included in this scoping review, involving 5185 participants with THA. Pelvic tilt was the most common parameter measured in the eligible studies (n = 26). The results were not consistent across all studies; however, it was demonstrated that the distribution of pelvic tilt following THA had a range of 25° posterior to 20° anterior. Moreover, decreased sacral slope and lower pelvic incidence were associated with increased risk of dislocation in patients with THA. Lumbar spine scoliosis did not change significantly after THA in patients with bilateral hip osteoarthritis (5.50°(1.16°) vs. 3.73°(1.16°); P-value = 0.29). Finally, one study indicated that LBP improvement was not correlated with postoperative changes in spinopelvic alignment parameters. Several methodological issues were addressed in this study, including no sample size calculation and no type-I error adjustment for outcome multiplicity. Changes in spinopelvic alignment may occur after THA and may improve with time. Patients with a THA dislocation usually show abnormal spinopelvic alignment compared to patients without a THA dislocation. LBP usually improves markedly over time following THA.

3 February 2020 in Current Drug Safety
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
NNNastaran Niroomand
Nastaran Niroomand
MBMohsen Bayati
Mohsen Bayati
MSMozhgan Seif
Mozhgan Seif
SDSomayeh Delavari
Somayeh Delavari
SDSajjad Delavari
Sajjad Delavari
Background: Self-medication could be risky behavior and has negative effects. While Over the Counter (OTC) drugs are available at drugstores, the behavior has become prevalent among the general population.Objective: This study aimed at surveying self-medication behavior among medical sciences students of Shiraz, Iran.Methods: A sample of 396 students from medical, paramedical, and health sciences disciplines were included in this cross-sectional study. They were asked to fill a questionnaire about their demographics and socioeconomic status, medication usage and self-medication in the last six months, information about the correct use of medication, and information about negative results of selfmedication. Data were analyzed using chi-square, t-test and logistic regression model using R statistical software.Results: Almost 72% of participants reported self-medication in the past sixth months. The main reasons included trust in their own diagnosis (59.9%), mildness of the disease (56.6%), and having previous experience about the disease (56%). Cough or cold (84.5%), headache (66.3%), and body pain (60.2%) were the most frequent diseases that led to self-medication. The majority of the participants (77.7%) reported they select their medicine on their own decision. Furthermore, self-medication was highly related to having medicine stock at home (OR=2.692), having less information about negative results of self-medication (OR=0.835), and more non-syllabus study time (OR=1.041).Conclusions: Although, medical science students have information about the treatment of illnesses, they should be more informed about negative results and side-effects of self-medication. They should also share their knowledge with society to decrease self-medication.

14 June 2022 in British Journal of Sports Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MPMohammadreza Pourahmadi
Mohammadreza Pourahmadi
SDSomayeh Delavari
Somayeh Delavari
JHJill A Hayden
Jill A Hayden
AKAbbas Keshtkar
Abbas Keshtkar
MAMaryam Ahmadi
Maryam Ahmadi
SRSidney M Rubinstein
Sidney M Rubinstein
Objective To evaluate the effectiveness of motor control training (MCT) compared with other physical therapist-led interventions, minimal/no intervention or surgery in patients with symptomatic lumbar disc herniation (LDH). Design Systematic review and meta-analysis. Data sources Eight databases and the ClinicalTrials.gov were searched from inception to April 2021. Eligibility criteria We included clinical trial studies with concurrent comparison groups which examined the effectiveness of MCT in patients with symptomatic LDH. Primary outcomes were pain intensity and functional status which were expressed as mean difference (MD) and standardised mean difference (SMD), respectively. Results We screened 6695 articles, of which 16 clinical trials (861 participants) were eligible. Fourteen studies were judged to have high risk of bias and two studies had some risk of bias. In patients who did not undergo surgery, MCT resulted in clinically meaningful pain reduction compared with other physical therapist-led interventions (ie, transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS)) at short-term (MD –28.85, –40.04 to −17.66, n=69, studies=2). However, the robustness of the finding was poor. For functional status, a large and statistically significant treatment effect was found in favour of MCT compared with traditional/classic general exercises at long-term (SMD −0.83 to –1.35 to −0.31, n=63, studies=1) and other physical therapist-led interventions (ie, TENS) at short-term (SMD −1.43 to –2.41 to −0.46, n=69, studies=2). No studies compared MCT with surgery. In patients who had undergone surgery, large SMDs were seen. In favour of MCT compared with traditional/classic general exercises (SMD −0.95 to –1.32 to −0.58, n=124, studies=3), other physical therapist-led interventions (ie, conventional treatments; SMD −2.30 to –2.96 to −1.64, n=60, studies=1), and minimal intervention (SMD −1.34 to –1.87 to −0.81, n=68, studies=2) for functional improvement at short-term. The overall certainty of evidence was very low to low. Conclusion At short-term, MCT improved pain and function compared with TENS in patients with symptomatic LDH who did not have surgery. MCT improved function compared with traditional/classic general exercises at long-term in patients who had undergone surgery. However, the results should be interpreted with caution because of the high risk of bias in the majority of studies. PROSPERO registration number CRD42016038166.

6 July 2021 in British Journal of Sports Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MPMohammadreza Pourahmadi
Mohammadreza Pourahmadi
SDSomayeh Delavari
Somayeh Delavari
BKBart Koes
Bart Koes
AKAbbas Keshtkar
Abbas Keshtkar
MNMaryam Nazemipour
Maryam Nazemipour
MMMohammad Ali Mansournia
Mohammad Ali Mansournia