Karl Stoffel

Prof. Dr. Karl Stoffel

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

20Years (2007-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
17 January 2008 in Journal of Orthopaedic Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
KSKarl Stoffel
Karl Stoffel
SCSam Cunneen
Sam Cunneen
RMRobert Morgan
Robert Morgan
RNRochelle Nicholls
Rochelle Nicholls
GSGwidon Stachowiak
Gwidon Stachowiak
In distal humerus fractures, the restoration of stability is important to allow early mobilization and hence more favorable functional outcomes. In this article, we compare the biomechanical stability of perpendicular and parallel locking plating systems for the internal fixation of AO Type C2 distal humerus fractures in osteoporotic bone. Fractures were simulated in paired cadaveric bones and fixed using either the perpendicular 3.5 mm LCP distal humerus plating system (Synthes; Sydney, Australia) or the parallel Mayo Clinic Congruent elbow plate system (Acumed; Hillsboro, OR), using locking screws in both systems. Both systems were then tested for their stiffness (in compression and internal/external rotation), plastic deformation, and failure in torsion. Comparatively, the parallel locking plate system provided a significantly higher stability in compression (p = 0.005) and external rotation (p = 0.006), and a greater ability (p = 0.005) to resist axial plastic deformation. Stability for both constructs appeared to be dependent on bone quality, however the stability of the perpendicular system was generally more sensitive to bone mineral density, indicating a possible need for additional independent interfragmentary screws. A disadvantage of the parallel locking plate system was wear debris produced by its tapping system. In summary, the biomechanical findings of this study suggest that both locking plate systems allow early mobilization of the elbow in patients with osteoporotic bone following fixation of a comminuted distal humerus fracture. However, the parallel locking system showed improved stability compared with the perpendicular locking system, and therefore may be more indicated. © 2008 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 26:778–784, 2008

1 November 2009 in Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
KSKarl Stoffel
Karl Stoffel
DWDavid Wysocki
David Wysocki
EBEdward Baddour
Edward Baddour
RNRochelle Nicholls
Rochelle Nicholls
PYPiers Yates
Piers Yates
Background: Intraoperative stress testing is required for the detection of syndesmosis instability following an ankle fracture. The present study compared two stress tests for the detection of syndesmotic injury. Methods: A true mortise radiograph of the ankle was made for fourteen cadaver joints. Specimens were randomized into two groups to simulate ligament and syndesmosis injury on the basis of the Danis-Weber classification system. In the first group, the anterior inferior tibiofibular ligament was divided first (Weber Br), followed sequentially by division of the interosseous membrane (Weber C) and the deltoid ligament. In the second group, the deltoid ligament was divided first, followed by the anterior inferior tibiofibular ligament. Radiographs were made at each stage with use of two methods of stressing the ankle mortise: (1) external rotation of the foot with an external moment of 7.5 Nm, and (2) application of a lateral force of 100 N. Tibiofibular overlap, tibiofibular clear space, and medial clear space were measured. Results: Lateral stress produced a significantly greater increase in the tibiofibular clear space than did the external rotation test for Weber C injuries and Weber C plus deltoid ligament injuries. A greater increase in the tibiofibular clear space was noted during the lateral stress test when both the deltoid and the anterior inferior tibiofibular ligament had been sectioned (p < 0.05). The external rotation stress test produced a significant increase in the medial clear space in the presence of isolated anterior inferior tibiofibular ligament and deltoid ligament injuries (p < 0.05). Conclusions: For the detection of syndesmotic instability at the site of ankle fractures on stress radiographs, the lateral stress test appeared to be superior to the external rotation stress test in this cadaver model. Clinical Relevance: The present study gives insight into the types of ligament damage that will produce a positive result on stress radiographs with use of two common intraoperative stress tests. Establishment of clinical correlation with the results of this cadaver model is necessary in order to develop operative guidelines.

7 March 2007 in Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
KSKarl Stoffel
Karl Stoffel
CWCraig Willers
Craig Willers
OKOmar Korshid
Omar Korshid
MKMarkus Kuster
Markus Kuster

1 July 2007 in Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
KSKarl Stoffel
Karl Stoffel
KLKai-Uwe Lorenz
Kai-Uwe Lorenz
MKMarkus S Kuster
Markus S Kuster
We compared the biomechanical stability of bone-plate constructs using a compression plate (CP), an internal fixator (IF), and a combination plate (CP/IF). Standardized simulated shaft fractures with a segmental defect in composite bones (n=60) and intraarticular distal femur fractures with a comminuted supracondylar zone in fresh frozen cadaveric femurs (n=36) were stabilized by CP, IF, and CP/IF. Construct stiffness, plastic deformation, and fixation strength were measured under axial compression and torsion using a biaxial testing machine. The experimental results indicate for the distal femur fracture model that IF has less loss of reduction by plastic deformation under axial load compared to CP (IF 61% of CP). Under torsion, the CP showed significantly (P<0.05) decreased plastic deformation compared to the IF (CP 51% of IF). The combination (CP/IF) of the 2 fixation principles generally resulted in a higher load to failure under axial compression and torsion (145% failure load of CP and 118% of IF under axial compression, 88% of CP and 109% of IF under torsion). Results were similar between the 2 fracture models. Under compression, IF provides similar fixation in comminuted fractures and was better than the CP for avoiding loss of reduction, whereas under torsional loading, CP was more important for stiffness, plastic deformation, and load to failure than IF. However, combination (CP/IF) fixation seems advisable in intraarticular and extraarticular fractures of long bones with a metaphyseal comminution. These data may be utilized by surgeons to build a more specific treatment plan in patients with these fracture types.

1 January 2007 in Clinical Biomechanics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
KSKarl Stoffel
Karl Stoffel
GBGrant Booth
Grant Booth
SRStephan M. Rohrl
Stephan M. Rohrl
MKMarkus Kuster
Markus Kuster

1 January 2008 in Clinical Biomechanics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
KSKarl Stoffel
Karl Stoffel
TLToby Leys
Toby Leys
NDNikki Damen
Nikki Damen
RNRochelle L. Nicholls
Rochelle L. Nicholls
MKMarkus S. Kuster
Markus S. Kuster