Susan Magasi

Prof. Susan Magasi

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

23Years (2004-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 November 2010 in Isokinetics and Exercise Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
RBRichard W. Bohannon
Richard W. Bohannon
DBDeborah J. Bubela
Deborah J. Bubela
Susan MagasiSusan Magasi
Susan Magasi
YWYing-Chih Wang
Ying-Chih Wang
RGRichard C. Gershon
Richard C. Gershon
Although the validity of the sit-to-stand (STS) test as a measure of lower limb strength has been questioned, it is widely used as such among older adults. The purposes of this study were: 1) to describe five-repetition STS test (FRSTST) performance (time) by adolescents and adults and 2) to determine the relationship of isometric knee extension strength (force and torque), age, gender, weight, and stature with that performance. Participants were 111 female and 70 male (14–85 years) community-dwelling enrollees in the NIH Toolbox Assessment of Neurological and Behavioral Function. The FRSTST was conducted using a standard armless chair. Knee extension force was measured using a belt-stabilized hand-held dynamometer; knee extension torque was measured using a Biodex dynamometer. The mean times for the FRSTST ranged from 6.0 sec (20–29 years) to 10.8 sec (80–85 years). For both the entire sample and a sub-sample of participants 50–85 years, knee extension strength (r=−0.388 to −0.634), age(r=0.561 and 0.466), and gender (r=0.182 and 0.276) were correlated significantly with FRSTST times. In all multiple regression models, knee extension strength provided the best explanation of FRSTST performance, but age contributed as well. Bodyweight and stature were less consistent in explaining FRSTST performance. Gender did not add to the explanation of FRSTST performance. Our findings suggest, therefore, that FRSTST time reflects lower limb strength, but that performance should be interpreted in light of age and other factors.

1 April 2015 in Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JHJoy Hammel
Joy Hammel
Susan MagasiSusan Magasi
Susan Magasi
AHAllen Walter Heinemann
Allen Walter Heinemann
DGDavid B. Gray
David B. Gray
SSSusan Stark
Susan Stark
EHElizabeth A. Hahn
Elizabeth A. Hahn

12 March 2013 in Neurology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
DRDavid B. Reuben
David B. Reuben
Susan MagasiSusan Magasi
Susan Magasi
HMHeather E. McCreath
Heather E. McCreath
RBRichard W. Bohannon
Richard W. Bohannon
YWYing-Chih Wang
Ying-Chih Wang
RGRichard C. Gershon
Richard C. Gershon
Motor function involves complex physiologic processes and requires the integration of multiple systems, including neuromuscular, musculoskeletal, and cardiopulmonary, and neural motor and sensory-perceptual systems. Motor-functional status is indicative of current physical health status, burden of disease, and long-term health outcomes, and is integrally related to daily functioning and quality of life. Given its importance to overall neurologic health and function, motor function was identified as a key domain for inclusion in the NIH Toolbox for Assessment of Neurological and Behavioral Function (NIH Toolbox). We engaged in a 3-stage developmental process to: 1) identify key subdomains and candidate measures for inclusion in the NIH Toolbox, 2) pretest candidate measures for feasibility across the age span of people aged 3 to 85 years, and 3) validate candidate measures against criterion measures in a sample of healthy individuals aged 3 to 85 years (n = 340). Based on extensive literature review and input from content experts, the 5 subdomains of dexterity, strength, balance, locomotion, and endurance were recommended for inclusion in the NIH Toolbox motor battery. Based on our validation testing, valid and reliable measures that are simultaneously low-cost and portable have been recommended to assess each subdomain, including the 9-hole peg board for dexterity, grip dynamometry for upper-extremity strength, standing balance test, 4-m walk test for gait speed, and a 2-minute walk test for endurance.

1 September 2015 in The Journal of Sexual Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
KWKevin P. Weinfurt
Kevin P. Weinfurt
LLLi Lin
Li Lin
DBDeborah Watkins Bruner
Deborah Watkins Bruner
JCJill M. Cyranowski
Jill M. Cyranowski
CDCarrie B. Dombeck
Carrie B. Dombeck
KFKathryn E. Flynn
Kathryn E. Flynn

1 October 2011 in Journal of Hand Therapy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
YWYing-Chih Wang
Ying-Chih Wang
Susan MagasiSusan Magasi
Susan Magasi
RBRichard W. Bohannon
Richard W. Bohannon
DRDavid B. Reuben
David B. Reuben
HMHeather E. McCreath
Heather E. McCreath
WRWilliam Z. Rymer
William Z. Rymer

25 August 2011 in Quality of Life Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Susan MagasiSusan Magasi
Susan Magasi
GRGery Ryan
Gery Ryan
DRDennis Revicki
Dennis Revicki
WLWilliam Lenderking
William Lenderking
RHRon D. Hays
Ron D. Hays
DCDavid Cella
David Cella