Tae-Yong Park

Dr. Tae-Yong Park

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

15Years (2012-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 April 2020 in Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
MHMan-Suk Hwang
Man-Suk Hwang
HLHye-Yoon Lee
Hye-Yoon Lee
TCTae-Young Choi
Tae-Young Choi
JLJung-Han Lee
Jung-Han Lee
YKYoun-Seok Ko
Youn-Seok Ko
Tae-Yong ParkTae-Yong Park
Tae-Yong Park
Background: Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) occurs in 68.1% of patients within the first month of undergoing chemotherapy; however, standardized treatment for CIPN has not been established yet. The efficacy of acupuncture, a widely used treatment for CIPN in South Korea, has not been studied sufficiently. This study aimed to review the studies that evaluated the efficacy of acupuncture or electroacupuncture (EA) in treating CIPN. Methods: A literature search was performed on relevant international databases — MEDLINE, Embase, the Allied and Complementary Medicine Databases, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure — as well as Korean databases — the National Digital Science Library, Oriental Medicine Advanced Searching Integrated System, DBpia, and Korean Studies Information Service System. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that aimed to treat CIPN symptoms with acupuncture or EA and set not only a control group with a conventional pharmacological treatment or injection, but also a placebo control or sham-acupuncture group, were included. Meta-analysis was conducted to elucidate the efficacy of acupuncture/EA on the basis of symptom score. Results: Of the 13 studies included in the literature review, 12 RCTs compared acupuncture and pharmacological treatments. There were 3 EA RCTs, but only 1 RCT compared EA and sham-EA. A total of 832 participants were included in these studies. Five RCTs showed that acupuncture was more effective than pharmacological treatment in terms of efficacy rate. Regarding the risk of bias summary, the quality of included studies was poor. Only 1 study compared the efficacy of EA and sham EA; therefore, the specific efficacy of acupuncture could not be elucidated. Conclusion: Acupuncture is safe, but the symptom-alleviating effect on CIPN can hardly be determined because of methodological deficiencies of the included studies. In terms of the clinical efficacy rate, acupuncture was more effective than conventional pharmacological treatments. PROSPERO registration number: CRD42018111509.

8 February 2012 in European Journal of Integrative Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Tae-Yong ParkTae-Yong Park
Tae-Yong Park
JLJu Ah Lee
Ju Ah Lee
MCMin Ho Cha
Min Ho Cha
BKByoung-Kab Kang
Byoung-Kab Kang
TMTae-Woong Moon
Tae-Woong Moon
Myeong Soo LeeMyeong Soo Lee
Myeong Soo Lee

27 September 2019 in Journal of Clinical Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Jin-Hyun LeeJin-Hyun Lee
Jin-Hyun Lee
Joong Il KimJoong Il Kim
Joong Il Kim
MBMyong Ki Baeg
Myong Ki Baeg
YSYun-Young Sunwoo
Yun-Young Sunwoo
KDKwangsun Do
Kwangsun Do
Tae-Yong ParkTae-Yong Park
Tae-Yong Park
Conventional and herbal drugs are frequently used together to treat many disorders. Samryungbaekchul-san (SRS, a herbal formula) and otilonium bromide (OB, an antispasmodic agent) are widely used to treat diarrhea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome (D-IBS) in Eastern Asian countries. However, there have been no studies on the co-administration of SRS and OB. Therefore, we aimed to preliminarily assess the feasibility of SRS combined with OB for D-IBS treatment in a pilot double-blind, four-arm, parallel-group, randomized controlled trial (RCT), including 80 patients diagnosed with D-IBS according to the Rome III criteria. The patients were randomly assigned to four treatment groups and were administered drugs for eight weeks after a two-week preparatory period. Follow-up was conducted four weeks after the administration period. The primary outcome was evaluated by using a global D-IBS symptom improvement score; no statistically significant difference was observed between the groups. However, multiple logistic regression analysis of primary outcome scores shows that SRS significantly improved D-IBS symptoms (p < 0.05). For secondary outcomes, better results were observed in the SRS + OB group, in terms of symptoms, including abdominal pain, discomfort, frequency of abdominal pain, and stool form than in OB alone or placebo groups (p < 0.05). In conclusion, the co-administration of SRS and OB might be an effective and safe strategy for the treatment of D-IBS. Large-scale RCTs are warranted to further confirm and clarify these findings.

8 November 2022 in Diagnostics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Jin-Hyun LeeJin-Hyun Lee
Jin-Hyun Lee
HWHyeonjun Woo
Hyeonjun Woo
JJJun-Su Jang
Jun-Su Jang
Joong Il KimJoong Il Kim
Joong Il Kim
YNYoung Cheol Na
Young Cheol Na
Tae-Yong ParkTae-Yong Park
Tae-Yong Park
Before Chuna manual therapy (CMT), a manual therapy applied in Korean medicine, CMT spinal diagnosis using palpation or X-ray is performed. However, studies on the inter-rater concordance of CMT diagnostic methods, concordance among diagnostic methods, and standard CMT diagnostic methods are scarce. Moreover, no clinical studies have used artificial intelligence (AI) programs for X-ray image-based CMT diagnosis. Therefore, this study sought a feasible and standard CMT spinal diagnostic method and explored the clinical applicability of the CMT-AI program. One hundred participants were recruited, and the concordance within and among different diagnostic modalities was analyzed by dividing them into manual diagnosis (MD), X-ray image-based diagnosis (XRD) by experts and non-experts, and XRD using a CMT-AI program by non-experts. Regarding intra-group concordance, XRD by experts showed the highest concordance (used as a gold standard when comparing inter-group concordance), followed by XRD using the AI program, XRD by non-experts, and then MD. Comparing diagnostic results between the groups, concordance with the gold standard was the highest for XRD using the AI program, followed by XRD by non-experts, and MD. Therefore, XRD is a more reasonable CMT diagnostic method than MD. Furthermore, the clinical applicability of the CMT-AI program is high.

1 January 2020 in Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
JLJin-Hyun Kmd Lee
Jin-Hyun Kmd Lee
TCTae Jin Cho
Tae Jin Cho
MPMin Geun Park
Min Geun Park
JKJi-Hoon Kim
Ji-Hoon Kim
SSSung Kyu Song
Sung Kyu Song
Tae-Yong ParkTae-Yong Park
Tae-Yong Park
Introduction: Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is one of the major side effects of chemotherapy. Its main symptoms are pain, paresthesia, and numbness. However, the mechanisms underlying the development of CIPN remain unclear and standard treatments have not been established. Recently, there has been a growing interest in various approaches to overcome the limitations of the existing treatments. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the concurrent use of two complementary and alternative therapies: electroacupuncture (EA) and Chuna manual therapy (CMT), with pregabalin, which is the conventional pharmacotherapy for neuropathic pain. Methods/design: This is an open-label, parallel, assessor-blinded randomized controlled trial, which includes 90 patients with colorectal and breast cancer, who developed CIPN. After a 2-week preparation period, the patients are divided into three groups (pregabalin administration group, pregabalin + EA treatment group, and pregabalin + CMT treatment group), treated for approximately 5 weeks and followed-up 4 weeks after treatment. The primary outcome is assessed using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy/Gynecologic Oncology Group Neurotoxicity subscale score (version 4.0) and the secondary outcome is measured using the Quality of Life Questionnaire-CIPN 20-Item Scale (version 3.0) and the quality of life questionnaire (version 3.0) developed by the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer. Moreover, exploratory efficacy and safety evaluations will be conducted based on the chemotherapy-completion rate and nerve conduction studies.

1 April 2019 in Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
MHMan-Suk Hwang
Man-Suk Hwang
HLHye-Yoon Lee
Hye-Yoon Lee
Jin-Hyun LeeJin-Hyun Lee
Jin-Hyun Lee
TCTae-Young Choi
Tae-Young Choi
JLJung-Han Lee
Jung-Han Lee
Tae-Yong ParkTae-Yong Park
Tae-Yong Park
Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) occurs in approximately 30% to 40% of patients who receive chemotherapy; however, standardized treatment for CIPN has not yet been developed. Acupuncture is widely used to treat CIPN in Korea, but its efficacy has not been investigated. The purpose of this study is to review the current literature on the efficacy of acupuncture and electroacupuncture (EA) in treating CIPN. We will perform a literature review using the relevant databases, including MEDLINE, Embase, the Allied and Complementary Medicine Databases (AMED), and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), as well as Korean databases, including the National Digital Science Library (NDSL), Oriental Medicine Advanced Searching Integrated System (OASIS), DBpia, and Korean studies Information Service System (KISS). Randomized controlled trials describing treatment of CIPN symptoms with acupuncture or EA will be included. The primary outcomes will be scores on a visual analog scale and a numeric rating scale for neuropathic pain. We will also assess the risk of bias by evaluating the available studies using the tools of the Cochrane Collaboration and carry out a meta-analysis. Ethical approvals and patient consent are not necessary because the meta-analysis will be based on published research. We will submit our meta-analysis to a peer-reviewed journal for publication. CRD42018111509