Thomas A Brettell

Prof. Dr. Thomas A Brettell


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

18Years (2009-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
7 May 2009 in Analytical Chemistry
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Thomas A BrettellThomas A Brettell
Thomas A Brettell
JBJ. M. Butler
J. M. Butler
JAJ. R. Almirall
J. R. Almirall

10 February 2009 in Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
LQLawrence Quarino
Lawrence Quarino
Thomas A BrettellThomas A Brettell
Thomas A Brettell

1 February 2020 in Forensic Science International
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MQMatthew Quinn
Matthew Quinn
Thomas A BrettellThomas A Brettell
Thomas A Brettell
MJMonica Joshi
Monica Joshi
JBJennifer Bonetti
Jennifer Bonetti
LQLawrence Quarino
Lawrence Quarino

1 August 2020 in Data in Brief
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
YLYifan Liu
Yifan Liu
JVJustin Victoria
Justin Victoria
MWMatthew Wood
Matthew Wood
MSMarianne E. Staretz
Marianne E. Staretz
Thomas A BrettellThomas A Brettell
Thomas A Brettell
This article contains data from triplicate analyses of ten different TLC mobile phase systems from the analysis of 11 cannabinoid standards using HPTLC. The data includes 1) example plate images for 8 mobile phases during evaluation; 2) example table of calculated average, standard deviation, CV% of RF for hexane:acetone (87:13) system during evaluation; 3) images of all case sample plates. The validation of the two chosen mobile phases were done according to the SWGDRUG validation requirements [1]. This data can be used for choosing an alternative mobile phase TLC system for the analysis of cannabinoids. The data described in this article is related to a previous published research article “High Performance Thin-Layer Chromatography (HPTLC) analysis of cannabinoids in cannabis extracts” by Liu, et al. (2020) [2].


3 March 2026 in Separations
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Thomas A BrettellThomas A Brettell
Thomas A Brettell
Green Analytical Chemistry (GAC) provides a framework for reducing hazardous reagents, energy consumption, and waste. The topic has gained momentum across many chemical industries over the past 25 years; however, progress in implementing sustainable methods and conducting greenness assessments within forensic laboratories has been comparatively slow. The purpose of this review is to highlight green approaches to analytical separation methods, including greenness assessment metrics, that have been reported in the literature for forensic chemistry and toxicology applications and to raise awareness of GAC in the forensic field. Recent scientific literature highlights promising advances in greener sample preparation and chromatographic approaches, particularly in forensic toxicology and seized-drug analysis. Emerging trends include the use of green solvents, bio-based and deep eutectic solvent systems, and the rapid expansion of microextraction techniques such as SPME, LPME, MEPS, FPSE, and DLLME, which reduce solvent volumes, minimize waste, and support higher-throughput workflows. Parallel developments in portable and miniaturized chromatographic instrumentation such as miniaturized LC–MS systems with increased detection specificity and Lab-on-a-Chip applications show promise for in situ measurements in the field. Ambient ionization mass spectrometry—in particular, DESI and DART—has had a major impact on forensic chemistry by providing tools for the rapid and direct analysis of chemical compounds in complex matrices with little or no sample preparation. Greenness assessment tools—including AGREE, AGREEprep, Eco-Scale, GAPI, and BAGI—are increasingly applied to evaluate analytical methods in forensic chemistry and toxicology, including those used for novel psychoactive substances. Although many green methodologies are well documented, their routine implementation remains limited. The continued integration of green solvents, microextractions, portable instrumentation, and standardized greenness metrics will be essential for advancing sustainable forensic separations.