Umberto Riccardi

Dr. Umberto Riccardi

Università degli studi "Federico II" di Napoli Dipartimento di Scienze della Terra, dell'Ambiente e delle Risorse (DiSTAR)
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

30Years (1997-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
18 March 2013 in Reports on Progress in Physics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DCDavid Crossley
David Crossley
JHJacques Hinderer
Jacques Hinderer
Umberto RiccardiUmberto Riccardi
Umberto Riccardi
This review covers basic theory and techniques behind the use of ground-based gravimetry at the Earth's surface. The orientation is toward modern instrumentation, data processing and interpretation for observing surface, land-based, time-variable changes to the geopotential. The instrumentation side is covered in some detail, with specifications and performance of the most widely used models of the three main types: the absolute gravimeters (FG5, A10 from Micro-g LaCoste), superconducting gravimeters (OSG, iGrav from GWR instruments), and the new generation of spring instruments (Micro-g LaCoste gPhone, Scintrex CG5 and Burris ZLS). A wide range of applications is covered, with selected examples from tides and ocean loading, atmospheric effects on gravity, local and global hydrology, seismology and normal modes, long period and tectonics, volcanology, exploration gravimetry, and some examples of gravimetry connected to fundamental physics. We show that there are only a modest number of very large signals, i.e. hundreds of µGal (10(-8) m s(-2)), that are easy to see with all gravimeters (e.g. tides, volcanic eruptions, large earthquakes, seasonal hydrology). The majority of signals of interest are in the range 0.1-5.0 µGal and occur at a wide range of time scales (minutes to years) and spatial extent (a few meters to global). Here the competing effects require a careful combination of different gravimeter types and measurement strategies to efficiently characterize and distinguish the signals. Gravimeters are sophisticated instruments, with substantial up-front costs, and they place demands on the operators to maximize the results. Nevertheless their performance characteristics such as drift and precision have improved dramatically in recent years, and their data recording ability and ruggedness have seen similar advances. Many subtle signals are now routinely connected with known geophysical effects such as coseismic earthquake displacements, post-glacial rebound, local hydrological mass balances, and detection of non-steric sea level changes.

1 June 1998 in Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
GBGiovanna Berrino
Giovanna Berrino
GCGennaro Corrado
Gennaro Corrado
Umberto RiccardiUmberto Riccardi
Umberto Riccardi

1 October 2014 in Journal of Geodynamics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
BHBasile Hector
Basile Hector
JHJacques Hinderer
Jacques Hinderer
LSL. Séguis
L. Séguis
Jean-Paul BoyJean-Paul Boy
Jean-Paul Boy
MCMarta Calvo
Marta Calvo
Umberto RiccardiUmberto Riccardi
Umberto Riccardi


1 August 2008 in Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
GBGiovanna Berrino
Giovanna Berrino
GCGennaro Corrado
Gennaro Corrado
Umberto RiccardiUmberto Riccardi
Umberto Riccardi

4 November 2020 in Remote Sensing
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Stefano TavaniStefano Tavani
Stefano Tavani
APAntonio Pignalosa
Antonio Pignalosa
Amerigo CorradettiAmerigo Corradetti
Amerigo Corradetti
MMMarco Mercuri
Marco Mercuri
LSLuca Smeraglia
Luca Smeraglia
ABAndrea Billi
Andrea Billi
Geotagged smartphone photos can be employed to build digital terrain models using structure from motion-multiview stereo (SfM-MVS) photogrammetry. Accelerometer, magnetometer, and gyroscope sensors integrated within consumer-grade smartphones can be used to record the orientation of images, which can be combined with location information provided by inbuilt global navigation satellite system (GNSS) sensors to geo-register the SfM-MVS model. The accuracy of these sensors is, however, highly variable. In this work, we use a 200 m-wide natural rocky cliff as a test case to evaluate the impact of consumer-grade smartphone GNSS sensor accuracy on the registration of SfM-MVS models. We built a high-resolution 3D model of the cliff, using an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) for image acquisition and ground control points (GCPs) located using a differential GNSS survey for georeferencing. This 3D model provides the benchmark against which terrestrial SfM-MVS photogrammetry models, built using smartphone images and registered using built-in accelerometer/gyroscope and GNSS sensors, are compared. Results show that satisfactory post-processing registrations of the smartphone models can be attained, requiring: (1) wide acquisition areas (scaling with GNSS error) and (2) the progressive removal of misaligned images, via an iterative process of model building and error estimation.