Vagner de Alencar Arnaut de Toledo

Prof. Dr. Vagner de Alencar Arnaut de Toledo

State University of Maringá, Maringá, Paraná, Brazil

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

28Years (1999-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 January 2005 in Brazilian Archives of Biology and Technology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
WCWainer César Chiari
Wainer César Chiari
VTVagner de Alencar Arnaut de Toledo
Vagner de Alencar Arnaut de Toledo
MRMaria Claudia Colla Ruvolo-Takasusuki
Maria Claudia Colla Ruvolo-Takasusuki
AOArildo José Braz de Oliveira
Arildo José Braz de Oliveira
ESEduardo Shiguero Sakaguti
Eduardo Shiguero Sakaguti
MMMarina Hitomi Mitsui
Marina Hitomi Mitsui
This experiment was carried out to evaluate the effect of the honeybee pollination in the production and quality of soybean seeds (Glycine max L. Merril). Seed production was higher (P=0.0001) in covered areas with honeybee colonies (50.64%) and uncovered areas (57.73%) than in covered areas without honeybee colonies. It could be concluded that honeybees were responsible for 95.5% of the pollination accomplished by insects. The pod number in covered treatment with honeybees was 61.38% higher (P=0.0002) than in the covered treatment without honeybees. The average weight of 100 seeds was larger (P=0.0001) in the area covered without honeybees, and reached 17.8 g. The medium content of crude protein in grains was 36.7% and the average oil content was 20.2%. The germination test did not show differences (P>0.05) among the seeds in different treatments. It was concluded that the honeybee pollination in the soybean increased the seeds production.

26 January 2018 in Environmental Toxicology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
DMDaiani Rodrigues Moreira
Daiani Rodrigues Moreira
AGAdriana Aparecida Sinópolis Gigliolli
Adriana Aparecida Sinópolis Gigliolli
JFJosé Ricardo Penteado Falco
José Ricardo Penteado Falco
AJAlison Henrique Ferreira Julio
Alison Henrique Ferreira Julio
EVEduardo Azzolini Volnistem
Eduardo Azzolini Volnistem
MRMaria Claudia Colla Ruvolo-Takasusuki
Maria Claudia Colla Ruvolo-Takasusuki

2 September 2016 in PLOS ONE
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Leticia M. EstevinhoLeticia M. Estevinho
Leticia M. Estevinho
ECEmerson Chambó
Emerson Chambó
APAna Paula Rodrigues Pereira
Ana Paula Rodrigues Pereira
CCCarlos Alfredo Lopes de Carvalho
Carlos Alfredo Lopes de Carvalho
VTVagner de Alencar Arnaut de Toledo
Vagner de Alencar Arnaut de Toledo
Traditionally, melissopalynological and physicochemical analyses have been the most used to determine the botanical origin of honey. However, when performed individually, these analyses may provide less unambiguous results, making it difficult to discriminate between mono and multifloral honeys. In this context, with the aim of better characterizing this beehive product, a selection of 112 Lavandula spp. monofloral honey samples from several regions were evaluated by association of multivariate statistical techniques with physicochemical, melissopalynological and phenolic compounds analysis. All honey samples fulfilled the quality standards recommended by international legislation, except regarding sucrose content and diastase activity. The content of sucrose and the percentage of Lavandula spp. pollen have a strong positive association. In fact, it was found that higher amounts of sucrose in honey are related with highest percentage of pollen of Lavandula spp.. The samples were very similar for most of the physicochemical parameters, except for proline, flavonoids and phenols (bioactive factors). Concerning the pollen spectrum, the variation of Lavandula spp. pollen percentage in honey had little contribution to the formation of samples groups. The formation of two groups regarding the physicochemical parameters suggests that the presence of other pollen types in small percentages influences the factor termed as “bioactive”, which has been linked to diverse beneficial health effects.

1 May 2005 in Brazilian Archives of Biology and Technology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
WCWainer César Chiari
Wainer César Chiari
VTVagner de Alencar Arnaut de Toledo
Vagner de Alencar Arnaut de Toledo
MRMaria Claudia Colla Ruvolo-Takasusuki
Maria Claudia Colla Ruvolo-Takasusuki
VAValeria Maria Attencia
Valeria Maria Attencia
FCFabiana Martins Costa
Fabiana Martins Costa
HMHelida Regina Magalhães
Helida Regina Magalhães
This research was carried out to evaluate the pollination by Africanized honeybees Apis mellifera, the floral biology and to observe the hoarding behavior in the soybean flowers (Glycine max Merril), var. BRS-133. The treatments were constituted of demarcated areas for free visitation of insects, covered areas by cages with a honeybee colony (A. mellifera) and also covered areas by cage without insects visitation. All areas had 24 m² (4m x 6m). The soybean flowers stayed open for a larger time (82.82 ± 3.48 hours) in covered area without honeybees. The stigma of the flowers was also more receptive (P=0.0021) in covered area without honeybees (87.3 ± 33.0%) and at 10:42 o'clock was the schedule of greater receptivity. The pollen stayed viable in all treatments, the average was 99.60 ± 0.02%, which did not present differences among treatments. The percentage of abortion of the flowers was 82.91% in covered area without honeybees, this result was superior (P=0.0002) to the 52.66% and 53.95% of the treatments uncovered and covered with honeybees, respectively. Honeybees were responsible for 87.7% of the pollination accomplished by the insects. The medium amounts of total sugar and glucose measured in the nectar of the flowers were, 14.33 ± 0.96 mg/flower and 3.61 ± 0.36 mg/ flower, respectively, not showing differences (P<0.05) among the treatments. The total solids, measured through the manual refratometer were 21.33 ± 0.22% in uncovered area and 22.33 ± 0.38% in covered with honeybees and differed to each other (P=0.0001). The honeybees were the most frequent insect (95.18%). Other observed insects were the Lepidoptera with 3.51% and other bees with 1.32%, in uncovered area. Honeybees visited 2.24 flowers on average in uncovered area and 1.58 in covered with honeybees and presented behavior for nectar hoarding and hoarding nectar/pollen in this period. In uncovered area the time of nectar hoarding was 2.55 ± 0.07 seconds, this time was smaller (P=0.0039) than 2.87 ± 0.08 seconds observed in covered area with honeybees. The behavior for the hoarding type observed in honeybees foraging the soybean flowers, through the content of its honey stomach and pollen loads of its pollen basket showed that the nectar forager did not show a pattern for the nectar collection, but for the pollen collection the schedule of pollen peak of the forager was at 11:36 o'clock. The soybean flowers showed alteration in floral biology when exposed to honeybees.

1 September 2011 in Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MSMaria Josiane Sereia
Maria Josiane Sereia
EAEloi M. Alves
Eloi M. Alves
VTVagner de Alencar Arnaut de Toledo
Vagner de Alencar Arnaut de Toledo
LMLuis C. Marchini
Luis C. Marchini
ESElizabete S. Serine
Elizabete S. Serine
AMAugusta C.C.C. Moreti
Augusta C.C.C. Moreti
The aim of this research was to analyze and compare 17 honey samples, 11 organic and six non-organic Apis mellifera honey. The samples were analyzed concerning moisture, hydroxymethylfurfural, diastase index, water activity, color, total sugar, reducing sugar, sucrose, ash, viscosity, electrical conductivity, pH, acidity, and formol index. With the exception of acidity, reducing sugar and diastase index, the averages of other parameters were different between the two groups. All samples of organic honey presented moisture values between 23.50 and 24.40%. Among the nonorganic honey samples, two presented apparent sucrose amount upper the maximum limit established by the Brazilian Legislation. According to the quantitative analysis of pollen sediments in the honey samples and frequency of pollen types in 17 honey samples, 41.20% were classified as unifioral, and the remainder as polifioral.

27 November 2009 in Apidologie
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
TBTatiane Vicente Baitala
Tatiane Vicente Baitala
PFPatrícia Faquinello
Patrícia Faquinello
VTVagner de Alencar Arnaut de Toledo
Vagner de Alencar Arnaut de Toledo
CMClaudete Aparecida Mangolin
Claudete Aparecida Mangolin
EMElias Nunes Martins
Elias Nunes Martins
MRMaria Claudia Colla Ruvolo-Takasusuki
Maria Claudia Colla Ruvolo-Takasusuki