Background/Objectives: Levothyroxine (L-T4) is available for use in congenital hypothyroidism (CH) in three formulations: tablets, drops, and oral solution. This study aims to compare the efficacy and safety of all three L-T4 formulations. Methods: We enrolled 63 children born between January 2019 and April 2023 in the Emilia-Romagna Region (Italy) and diagnosed with CH by newborn screening. They were divided according to the L-T4 formulation used: drops (Group D), oral solution (Group S), and tablets (Group T). Clinical and laboratory data were collected up to 3 years after the start of replacement therapy. Results: Serum-free thyroxine (sFT4) and thyroid stimulating hormone (sTSH) normalization occurred within the first month of treatment in most patients of all groups. No negative effects on growth and cognitive development were observed. At 7–15 days we found higher median sTSH levels (p = 0.031) and a greater percentage of patients with sTSH > 5 µU/mL (p = 0.011) in Group S than in Group T, but comparable sFT4 levels. At 12 months, a greater percentage of patients of Group D showed sFT4 values below the normal range than Group S (p = 0.011) and Group T (p = 0.038); Conclusions: Overall, our study reported an equal efficacy of the L-T4 oral solution compared to drops and tablets in CH treatment. A larger series of patients and a long-term follow-up are needed.
Background and Objectives: bLH is considered an excellent biochemical predictor of CPP. However, its utilization in clinical practice shows some uncertainties. This study aims to evaluate the diagnostic power of bLH and propose a diagnostic algorithm for CPP. Materials and Methods: We conducted a monocentric cohort retrospective study evaluating all females referred for suspicion of CPP between 1 January 2017 and 31 December 2020 who underwent a GnRH test. Auxological, hormonal, and instrumental data were collected, including pelvic ultrasonography and bone age (BA) assessment. Simple linear regression, t-test, and ROC tests were utilized to study the diagnostic value of basal hormone levels. Two hundred thirteen girls were included in the study. They were subdivided into two groups according to the results of the GnRH test: Group 1, with LH peak > 5 IU/L (pubertal) and 79 patients (37%), and Group 2, with an LH peak ≤ 5 IU/L (prepubertal) and 134 patients (63%). Results: The ROC curve showed that bLH level > 1.5 Ul/L best predicts a pubertal response to the GnRH test (AUC 0.8821, accuracy 82%), with low sensitivity (34%). The multivariate analysis found that bLH > 0.5 IU/L, basal FSH (bFSH) > 3.5 IU/L, bLH/bFSH ratio > 0.16, BA advancement > 1.7 years, uterine volume > 3.6 mL, longitudinal uterine diameter > 41 mm, and the presence of endometrial rhyme were significantly associated with a pubertal response at the GnRH test. An algorithm based on these features was created, and its application would reduce the number of GnRH tests by 34%. Overall, 96.2% of Group 1 patients reached the LH peak at the 30th minute of the GnRH test, supporting the hypothesis that the GnRH test duration could be reduced to 30 min. Conclusions: Morning bLH > 1.5 IU/L could be carefully used as a diagnostic predictor of CPP. The GnRH test, even reduced to 30 min, could be reserved for girls who show low intermediate morning bLH and specific clinical signs of pubertal development.