There is no standard second-line chemotherapy after progression on first-line therapy including gemcitabine and platinum combination in advanced gall bladder cancer patients. So this study was undertaken to assess the efficacy and safety of FOLFOX-4 regimen in this setting. In this observational study, patients with performance status ≤2, who progressed on first-line therapy, were enrolled from May 2010 to June 2014. FOLFOX-4 based treatment was administered until progression, unacceptable toxicity or up to 12 cycles. A total of 66 patients were enrolled in this study. The median age of patients was 52.5 years (32–66 years),of which 24 (36.36%) were males and 42 (63.63%) were females. The median number of cycles could be given were 9.5 (2–12). Only 43.93% patients in this study completed full 12 cycles of chemotherapy. Sixteen patients (24.24%) in this study required the dose reduction at least in one cycle of chemotherapy due to toxicities. Disease control rate was seen in 39 (59.09%) patients, with complete response in none, partial response in 16 (24.24%), stable disease in 23 (34.84%) and progressive disease in 27 (40.90%) patients. The median progression free survival was 3.9 months; median overall survival was 7.6 months. The main Grade 3/4 side effects seen were hematological in 31.81% (n = 21) and gastrointestinal in 25.75% (n = 17) patients. Majority of patients (46%) had Grade 1/2 peripheral neuropathy. FOLFOX-4 is an effective and well-tolerated regimen as a second-line treatment in advanced gall bladder cancer patients. Further studies are required, especially in the Indian subcontinent.

BACKGROUND: In squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN), epidermal growth factor receptor is expressed at very high levels. Hence, we have done this study to assess the response and tolerability of cetuximab and platinum-based chemotherapy in recurrent and metastatic (R/M) head and neck squamous cell cancer (HNSCC) in view of paucity of data from the Indian subcontinent. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this prospective study, patients of R/M SCCHN were randomly enrolled from September 2012 to April 2015. Chemotherapy (cisplatin/carboplatin/5-fluorouracil) and cetuximab-based treatment were administered up to 6 cycles or unacceptable toxicity. The response rates (RRs), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were analyzed. RESULTS: In total, fifty patients were enrolled. The median age was 51.0 years. A total of 255 cycles of treatment were administered (median = 6 cycles/patient). Four patients (8.0%) experienced complete response and 21 (42.0%) experienced partial response. Twenty-one patients (42.0%) had stable disease and four patients (8.0%) experienced progressive disease. The disease control rate was 92.0%. Median PFS was 5.3 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 4.52–6.14 months). Median OS was 9.933 months (95% CI: 8.58–11.28 months). There was statistically significant correlation between overall response and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (P = 0.014), site of tumor (P = 0.027), and histological grade of tumor (P = 0.001). The main Grade 3/4 side effects seen were hematological in 44 (88%) and gastrointestinal in 28 (56%) patients. CONCLUSIONS: The RR of cetuximab plus chemotherapy of >45% and the promising PFS rates are strong arguments for clinically testing this combination and this treatment schedule further in R/M HNSCC.

We aimed to use quantitative values derived from perfusion and diffusion-weighted MR imaging (PWI and DWI) to differentiate radiation-induced necrosis (RIN) from tumor recurrence in Glioblastoma (GBM) and investigate the best parameters for improved diagnostic accuracy and clinical decision-making. Methods: A retrospective analysis of follow-up MRI with new enhancing observations was performed in histopathologically confirmed subjects of post-treated GBM, who underwent re-surgical exploration. Quantitative estimation of rCBV (relative cerebral blood volume) from PWI and three methods of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) estimation were performed, namely ADC R1 (whole cross-sectional area of tumor), ADC R2 (only solid enhancing lesion), and ADC R3 (central necrosis). ROC curve and logistic regression analysis was completed. A confusion matrix table created using Excel provided the best combination parameters to ameliorate false-positive and false-negative results. Results: Forty-four subjects with a mean age of 46 years (range, 19–70 years) underwent re-surgical exploration with RIN in 28 (67%) and recurrent tumor in 16 (33%) on histopathology. rCBV threshold of >3.4 had the best diagnostic accuracy (AUC = 0.93, 81% sensitivity and 89% specificity). A multiple logistic regression model showed significant contributions from rCBV (p < 0.001) and ADC R3 (p = 0.001). After analysis of confusion matrix ADC R3 > 2032 × 10⁻⁶ mm² achieved 100% specificity with gain in sensitivity (94% vs. 56%). Conclusions: A combination of parameters had better diagnostic performance, and a stepwise combination of rCBV and ADC R3 obviated unnecessary biopsies in 10% (3/28), leading to improved clinical decision-making.

BACKGROUND: Gemcitabine plus cisplatin has been established as a standard chemotherapy regimen for advanced biliary tract cancers (BTCs) based on the phase III UK ABC-02 study, which included all types of biliary cancers. There is very limited data regarding the effectiveness of known chemotherapeutic regimens especially in IHCC. METHODS: Records of 63 patients diagnosis of IHCC who received Gemcitabine and Carboplatin (G-C Regimen) chemotherapy as a first line were retrospectively reviewed. The primary aim of this study was to assess the response rate of gemcitabine carboplatin-based chemotherapy as a first line therapy in advanced intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (IHCC). The secondary objectives were to assess toxicity, progression free survival and overall survival. RESULTS: There were 38 men and 25 women in our study with a median age of 56.75 years (range 31–78 years). Of the 38+25= 63 patients, 21 patients (33.8%) progressed, 5 patients (8.06%) had complete response, 25 patients (40.3%) had partial response, 12 patients (19.3%) had stable disease. Overall response rate was 48.36% and tumor control rate was 67.6%. Progression free survival was 5.3 months and overall survival of 10.3 months was seen. The most common grade 3–4 toxicities were anemia, neutropenia, and thrombocytopenia. Most common nonhematological toxicity was fatigue. CONCLUSION: Gemcitabine in combination with carboplatin has activity against advanced IHCC. Our results are comparable with other gemcitabine carboplatin studies as well as gemcitabine cisplatin-based studies.

Background & objectives: Gallbladder (GBC) is an aggressive form of cancer and most patients present with advanced unresectable disease due to lack of early signs and symptoms. This retrospective study was conducted to present the treatment outcomes with three lines of chemotherapies in a subset of patients with advanced, unresectable GBC with the primary objective to determine the response rates with nab-paclitaxel as the third-line chemotherapy after failure of the first-line gemcitabine and platinum and the second-line FOLFOX-4 (oxaliplatin, leucovorin and 5-FU) therapy. Another objective was to evaluate the toxicity, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Methods: Treatment-naive patients with histologically proven inoperable GBC treated with gemcitabine/platinum, FOLFOX-4 and nab-paclitaxel as the first-, second- and third-line chemotherapy were included in this study. The dose of gemcitabine and cisplatin or carboplatin was 1 g/m² on days 1 and 8 and 75 mg/m² (or target AUC of 5) on day 1, in a 21-day cycle. FOLFOX-4 was administered every two weeks and nab-paclitaxel was administered as 125 mg/m² on days 1, 8 and 15 in a 28-day cycle. Results: There were eight men and 13 women with a median age of 57 yr who received nab-paclitaxel therapy. The overall response rate of the first-, second- and third-line chemotherapy was 61.9, 57.1 and 52.4 per cent, respectively. The median PFS for the gemcitabine/platinum, FOLFOX-4 and nab-paclitaxel therapy was 5.5, 5.4 and 2.9 months, respectively. The median OS with three lines of therapies was 14.0 months. Common Terminology Criteria (CTC) grade 3 or 4 haematological toxicities were observed in 28.6, 38.1 and 23.8 per cent of patients on gemcitabine/platinum, FOLFOX-4 and nab-paclitaxel therapy, respectively. Interpretation & conclusions: Our study suggests the clinical benefit of nab-paclitaxel chemotherapy in prolonging OS in a selected subgroup of advanced, unresectable GBC patients after failure of the first-line gemcitabine and platinum and the second-line FOLFOX-4 therapy.