The bulk of grape juice fermentation is carried out by the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, but non-Saccharomyces yeasts can modulate many sensorial aspects of the final products in ways not well understood. In this study, some of such non-conventional yeasts were screened as mixed starter cultures in a defined growth medium in both simultaneous and sequential inoculations. One strain of Starmerella bacillaris and another of Zygosaccharomyces bailii were chosen by their distinct phenotypic footprint and their ability to reduce ethanol levels at the end of fermentation. S. bacillaris losses viability strongly at the end of mixed fermentations, while Z. bailii remains viable. S. cerevisiae viability was unchanged by the presence of the other yeasts. Physiological characterization of both strains indicates that S. bacillaris behavior is overall more different from S. cerevisiae than Z. bailii. In addition, S. cerevisiae transcriptome changes to a bigger degree in the presence of S. bacillaris in comparison to mixed fermentation with Z. bailii. S. bacillaris induces the translation machinery and repress vesicular transport. Both non-Saccharomyces yeasts induce S. cerevisiae glycolytic genes, and that may be related to ethanol lowering, but some aspects of carbon-related mechanisms are specific for each strain. Z. bailii presence increases the stress-related polysaccharides trehalose and glycogen, while S. bacillaris induces gluconeogenesis genes.
22 July 2020 in Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
The ability of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae to adapt to the changing environment of industrial processes lies in the activation and coordination of many molecular pathways. The most relevant ones are nutrient signaling pathways because they control growth and stress response mechanisms as a result of nutrient availability or scarcity and, therefore, leave an ample margin to improve yeast biotechnological performance. A standardized grape juice fermentation assay allowed the analysis of mutants for different elements of many nutrient signaling pathways under different conditions (low/high nitrogen and different oxygenation levels) to allow genetic-environment interactions to be analyzed. The results indicate that the cAMP-dependent PKA pathway is the most relevant regardless of fermentation conditions, while mutations on TOR pathways display an effect that depends on nitrogen availability. The production of metabolites of interest, such as glycerol, acetic acid and pyruvate, is controlled in a coordinated manner by the contribution of several components of different pathways. Ras GTPase Ras2, a stimulator of cAMP production, is a key factor for achieving fermentation, and is also relevant for sensing nitrogen availability. Increasing cAMP concentrations by deleting an enzyme used for its degradation, phosphodiesterase Pde2, proved a good way to increase fermentation kinetics, and offered keys for biotechnological improvement. Surprisingly glucose repression protein kinase Snf1 and Nitrogen Catabolite Repression transcription factor Gln3 are relevant in fermentation, even in the absence of starvation. Gln3 proved essential for respiration in several genetic backgrounds, and its presence is required to achieve full glucose de-repression. Therefore, most pathways sense different types of nutrients and only their coordinated action can ensure successful wine fermentation.
Peroxiredoxins are a family of peroxide-degrading enzymes for challenging oxidative stress. They receive their reducing power from redox-controlling proteins called thioredoxins, and these, in turn, from thioredoxin reductase. The main cytosolic peroxiredoxin is Tsa1, a moonlighting protein that also acts as protein chaperone a redox switch controlling some metabolic events. Gene deletion of peroxiredoxins in wine yeasts indicate that TSA1, thioredoxins and thioredoxin reductase TRR1 are required for normal growth in medium with glucose and sucrose as carbon sources. TSA1 gene deletion also diminishes growth in molasses, both in flasks and bioreactors. The TSA1 mutation brings about an expected change in redox parameters but, interestingly, it also triggers a variety of metabolic changes. It influences trehalose accumulation, lowering it in first molasses growth stages, but increasing it at the end of batch growth, when respiratory metabolism is set up. Glycogen accumulation at the entry of the stationary phase also increases in the tsa1Δ mutant. The mutation reduces fermentative capacity in grape juice, but the vinification profile does not significantly change. However, acetic acid and acetaldehyde production decrease when TSA1 is absent. Hence, TSA1 plays a role in the regulation of metabolic reactions leading to the production of such relevant enological molecules.
22 March 2025 in Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Acetic acid is a key metabolite in yeast fermentation, influencing wine quality through its role in volatile acidity. In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, acetic acid production involves aldehyde dehydrogenases, primarily Ald6p during fermentation and Ald4p under respiratory conditions. However, the regulatory mechanisms of these enzymes throughout fermentation and how they differ in commonly used strains remain partially unclear. This study explores cytosolic peroxiredoxin Tsa1p as a novel regulator of acetic acid metabolism. TSA1 gene deletion revealed strain-dependent effects on acetic acid metabolism and tolerance, showing reduced production and enhanced consumption in the laboratory media. Under respiration, Ald4p-driven acetic acid production, which raises extracellular pH, was mitigated by the absence of Tsa1p. During wine fermentation, TSA1 deletion decreased the initial acetic acid surge by downregulating the ALD6 transcription and enzymatic activity. These findings establish Tsa1p as a metabolic regulator and a potential target for modulating acetic acid levels to manage volatile acidity and improve wine quality.
Background: Global warming causes an increase in the levels of sugars in grapes and hence in ethanol after wine fermentation. Therefore, alcohol reduction is a major target in modern oenology. Deletion of the MKS1 gene, a negative regulator of the Retrograde Response pathway, in Saccharomyces cerevisiae was reported to increase glycerol and reduce ethanol and acetic acid in wine. This study aimed to obtain mutants with a phenotype similar to that of the MKS1 deletion strain by subjecting commercial S. cerevisiae wine strains to an adaptive laboratory evolution (ALE) experiment with the lysine toxic analogue S-(2-aminoethyl)-L-cysteine (AEC). Results: In laboratory-scale wine fermentation, isolated AEC-resistant mutants overproduced glycerol and reduced acetic acid. In some cases, ethanol was also reduced. Whole-genome sequencing revealed point mutations in the Retrograde Response activator Rtg2 and in the homocitrate synthases Lys20 and Lys21. However, only mutations in Rtg2 were responsible for the overactivation of the Retrograde Response pathway and ethanol reduction during vinification. Finally, wine fermentation was scaled up in an experimental cellar for one evolved mutant to confirm laboratory-scale results, and any potential negative sensory impact was ruled out. Conclusions: Overall, we have shown that hyperactivation of the Retrograde Response pathway by ALE with AEC is a valid approach for generating ready-to-use mutants with a desirable phenotype in winemaking.
Wine strains of Saccharomycescerevisiae have to adapt their metabolism to the changing conditions during their biotechnological use, from the aerobic growth in sucrose-rich molasses for biomass propagation to the anaerobic fermentation of monosaccharides of grape juice during winemaking. Yeast have molecular mechanisms that favor the use of preferred carbon and nitrogen sources to achieve such adaptation. By using specific inhibitors, it was determined that commercial strains offer a wide variety of glucose repression profiles. Transcription factor Gln3 has been involved in glucose and nitrogen repression. Deletion of GLN3 in two commercial wine strains produced different mutant phenotypes and only one of them displayed higher glucose repression and was unable to grow using a respiratory carbon source. Therefore, the role of this transcription factor contributes to the variety of phenotypic behaviors seen in wine strains. This variability is also reflected in the impact of GLN3 deletion in fermentation, although the mutants are always more tolerant to inhibition of the nutrient signaling complex TORC1 by rapamycin, both in laboratory medium and in grape juice fermentation. Therefore, most aspects of nitrogen catabolite repression controlled by TORC1 are conserved in winemaking conditions.