Wilburn E Reddick

Dr. Wilburn E Reddick

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

37Years (1990-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
7 November 2017 in Nature Communications
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LMLena Maier-Hein
Lena Maier-Hein
PNPeter F. Neher
Peter F. Neher
JHJean-Christophe Houde
Jean-Christophe Houde
MCMarc-Alexandre Côté
Marc-Alexandre Côté
EGEleftherios Garyfallidis
Eleftherios Garyfallidis
Maxime DescoteauxMaxime Descoteaux
Maxime Descoteaux
Tractography based on non-invasive diffusion imaging is central to the study of human brain connectivity. To date, the approach has not been systematically validated in ground truth studies. Based on a simulated human brain data set with ground truth tracts, we organized an open international tractography challenge, which resulted in 96 distinct submissions from 20 research groups. Here, we report the encouraging finding that most state-of-the-art algorithms produce tractograms containing 90% of the ground truth bundles (to at least some extent). However, the same tractograms contain many more invalid than valid bundles, and half of these invalid bundles occur systematically across research groups. Taken together, our results demonstrate and confirm fundamental ambiguities inherent in tract reconstruction based on orientation information alone, which need to be considered when interpreting tractography and connectivity results. Our approach provides a novel framework for estimating reliability of tractography and encourages innovation to address its current limitations.

1 July 2004 in The Lancet Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
RMRaymond K Mulhern
Raymond K Mulhern
TMThomas E Merchant
Thomas E Merchant
AGAmar Gajjar
Amar Gajjar
Wilburn E ReddickWilburn E Reddick
Wilburn E Reddick
LKLarry E Kun
Larry E Kun

20 March 2014 in Journal of Clinical Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DBDeepa Bhojwani
Deepa Bhojwani
NSNoah D. Sabin
Noah D. Sabin
DPDeqing Pei
Deqing Pei
JYJun J. Yang
Jun J. Yang
RKRaja B. Khan
Raja B. Khan
MRMary V. Relling
Mary V. Relling
Purpose: Methotrexate (MTX) can cause significant clinical neurotoxicity and asymptomatic leukoencephalopathy. We sought to identify clinical, pharmacokinetic, and genetic risk factors for these MTX-related toxicities during childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) therapy and provide data on safety of intrathecal and high-dose MTX rechallenge in patients with neurotoxicity. Patients and Methods: Prospective brain magnetic resonance imaging was performed at four time points for 369 children with ALL treated in a contemporary study that included five courses of high-dose MTX and 13 to 25 doses of triple intrathecal therapy. Logistic regression modeling was used to evaluate clinical and pharmacokinetic factors, and a genome-wide association study (GWAS) was performed to identify germline polymorphisms for their association with neurotoxicities. Results: Fourteen patients (3.8%) developed MTX-related clinical neurotoxicity. Of 13 patients rechallenged with intrathecal and/or high-dose MTX, 12 did not experience recurrence of neurotoxicity. Leukoencephalopathy was found in 73 (20.6%) of 355 asymptomatic patients and in all symptomatic patients and persisted in 74% of asymptomatic and 58% of symptomatic patients at the end of therapy. A high 42-hour plasma MTX to leucovorin ratio (measure of MTX exposure) was associated with increased risk of leukoencephalopathy in multivariable analysis (P = .038). GWAS revealed polymorphisms in genes enriched for neurodevelopmental pathways with plausible mechanistic roles in neurotoxicity. Conclusion: MTX-related clinical neurotoxicity is transient, and most patients can receive subsequent MTX without recurrence of acute or subacute symptoms. All symptomatic patients and one in five asymptomatic patients develop leukoencephalopathy that can persist until the end of therapy. Polymorphisms in genes related to neurogenesis may contribute to susceptibility to MTX-related neurotoxicity.

15 April 2001 in Journal of Clinical Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SPShawna L. Palmer
Shawna L. Palmer
OGOlga Goloubeva
Olga Goloubeva
Wilburn E ReddickWilburn E Reddick
Wilburn E Reddick
JGJohn O. Glass
John O. Glass
AGAmar Gajjar
Amar Gajjar
RMRaymond K. Mulhern
Raymond K. Mulhern
PURPOSE: To examine two competing hypotheses relating to intellectual loss among children treated for medulloblastoma (MB): Children with MB either: (1) lose previously learned skills and information; or (2) acquire new skills and information but at a rate slower than expected compared with healthy same-age peers. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-four pediatric MB patients were evaluated who were treated with postoperative radiation therapy (XRT) with or without chemotherapy. After completion of XRT, a total of 150 examinations were conducted by use of the child version of the Wechsler Intelligence Scales. These evaluations provided a measure of intellectual functioning called the estimated full-scale intelligence quotient (FSIQ). Changes in patient performance corrected for age (scaled scores) as well as the uncorrected performance (raw scores) were analyzed. RESULTS: At the time of the most recent examination, the obtained mean estimated FSIQ of 83.57 was more than one SD below expected population norms. A significant decline in cognitive performance during the time since XRT was demonstrated, with a mean loss of 2.55 estimated FSIQ points per year (P = .0001). An analysis for the basis of the intelligence quotient (IQ) loss revealed that subtest raw score values increased significantly over time since XRT, but the rate of increase was less than normally expected, which resulted in decreased IQ scores. CONCLUSION: These results support the hypothesis that MB patients demonstrate a decline in IQ values because of an inability to acquire new skills and information at a rate comparable to their healthy same-age peers, as opposed to a loss of previously acquired information and skills.

15 January 2001 in Journal of Clinical Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
RMRaymond K. Mulhern
Raymond K. Mulhern
SPShawna L. Palmer
Shawna L. Palmer
Wilburn E ReddickWilburn E Reddick
Wilburn E Reddick
JGJohn O. Glass
John O. Glass
LKLarry E. Kun
Larry E. Kun
AGAmar Gajjar
Amar Gajjar
PURPOSE: To test the hypothesis that inadequate development of normal-appearing white matter (NAWM) is associated with the relationship between young age at the time of craniospinal irradiation (CRT) and deficient neurocognitive performance in survivors of childhood medulloblastoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-two patients treated since 1985 participated in this cross-sectional study. All had been treated with CRT with or without chemotherapy and had survived 1 or more years after treatment. Neurocognitive evaluations were conducted with tests of intellect (intelligent quotient; IQ), verbal memory, and sustained attention. Quantitative magnetic resonance imaging, using a hybrid neural network, assessed the volume of NAWM. RESULTS: Neurocognitive test results were below normal expectations for age at the time of testing. A young age at CRT was significantly associated with worse performance on all neurocognitive tests except that of verbal memory. An increased time from completion of CRT was significantly associated with worse performance on all neurocognitive tests except that of sustained attention. After statistically controlling for the effects of time from CRT, we examined the association of NAWM with neurocognitive test results. These analyses revealed that NAWM accounted for a significant amount of the association between age at CRT and IQ, factual knowledge, and verbal and nonverbal thinking, but not sustained attention or verbal memory. CONCLUSION: The present results suggest that, at least for some cognitive functions, deficient development and/or loss of NAWM after CRT may provide a neuroanatomical substrate for the adverse impact of a young age at the time of CRT.

30 April 2003 in Cancer
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Wilburn E ReddickWilburn E Reddick
Wilburn E Reddick
HWHolly A. White
Holly A. White
JGJohn O Glass
John O Glass
GWGregory C. Wheeler
Gregory C. Wheeler
STStephen J. Thompson
Stephen J. Thompson
RMRaymond K. Mulhern
Raymond K. Mulhern
BACKGROUND: The primary objective of this study was to test the hypothesis that, among survivors of pediatric brain tumors, the association between reduced volumes of normal‐appearing white matter (NAWM) and intellectual/academic achievement deficits can be explained by patient problems with memory and attention.METHODS: Quantitative tissue volumes from magnetic resonance imaging scans and neurocognitive assessments were obtained for 40 long‐term survivors of pediatric brain tumors. They were treated with radiotherapy (RT) with or without chemotherapy 2.6–15.3 years earlier (median, 5.7 years) at an age of 1.7–14.8 years (median, 6.5 years). Neurocognitive assessments included standardized tests of intellect (intelligence quotient [IQ]), attention, memory, and academic achievement.RESULTS: Analyses revealed significant impairments in patients' neurocognitive test performance on all measures. After statistically controlling for age at RT and time from RT, significant associations were found between NAWM volumes and both attentional abilities and IQ, and between attentional abilities and IQ. Subsequent analyses supported the hypothesis that attentional abilities, but not memory, could explain a significant amount of the relationship between NAWM and IQ. The final developmental model predicting academic achievement based on NAWM, attentional abilities, and IQ explained approximately 60% of the variance in reading and spelling and almost 80% of the variance in math.CONCLUSIONS: The authors demonstrated that the primary consequence of reduced NAWM among pediatric patients treated for brain tumors was decreased attentional abilities, leading to declining IQ and academic achievement. Cancer 2003;10:2512–9. © 2003 American Cancer Society.DOI 10.1002/cncr.11355