Xin Liu

Dr. Xin Liu

Xi’an Jiaotong-Liverpool University, Suzhou, Anhui, China
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

16Years (2011-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
24 September 2011 in Nucleic Acids Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
FZFeng Zhu
Feng Zhu
ZSZhe Shi
Zhe Shi
CQChu Qin
Chu Qin
LTLin Tao
Lin Tao
XLXin Liu
Xin Liu
YCYuzong Chen
Yuzong Chen
Knowledge and investigation of therapeutic targets (responsible for drug efficacy) and the targeted drugs facilitate target and drug discovery and validation. Therapeutic Target Database (TTD, http://bidd.nus.edu.sg/group/ttd/ttd.asp) has been developed to provide comprehensive information about efficacy targets and the corresponding approved, clinical trial and investigative drugs. Since its last update, major improvements and updates have been made to TTD. In addition to the significant increase of data content (from 1894 targets and 5028 drugs to 2025 targets and 17 816 drugs), we added target validation information (drug potency against target, effect against disease models and effect of target knockout, knockdown or genetic variations) for 932 targets, and 841 quantitative structure activity relationship models for active compounds of 228 chemical types against 121 targets. Moreover, we added the data from our previous drug studies including 3681 multi-target agents against 108 target pairs, 116 drug combinations with their synergistic, additive, antagonistic, potentiative or reductive mechanisms, 1427 natural product-derived approved, clinical trial and pre-clinical drugs and cross-links to the clinical trial information page in the ClinicalTrials.gov database for 770 clinical trial drugs. These updates are useful for facilitating target discovery and validation, drug lead discovery and optimization, and the development of multi-target drugs and drug combinations.

18 July 2011 in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
FZFeng Zhu
Feng Zhu
CQChu Qin
Chu Qin
LTLin Tao
Lin Tao
XLXin Liu
Xin Liu
ZSZhe Shi
Zhe Shi
YCYuzong Chen
Yuzong Chen
Many drugs are nature derived. Low drug productivity has renewed interest in natural products as drug-discovery sources. Nature-derived drugs are composed of dozens of molecular scaffolds generated by specific secondary-metabolite gene clusters in selected species. It can be hypothesized that drug-like structures probably are distributed in selective groups of species. We compared the species origins of 939 approved and 369 clinical-trial drugs with those of 119 preclinical drugs and 19,721 bioactive natural products. In contrast to the scattered distribution of bioactive natural products, these drugs are clustered into 144 of the 6,763 known species families in nature, with 80% of the approved drugs and 67% of the clinical-trial drugs concentrated in 17 and 30 drug-prolific families, respectively. Four lines of evidence from historical drug data, 13,548 marine natural products, 767 medicinal plants, and 19,721 bioactive natural products suggest that drugs are derived mostly from preexisting drug-productive families. Drug-productive clusters expand slowly by conventional technologies. The lack of drugs outside drug-productive families is not necessarily the result of under-exploration or late exploration by conventional technologies. New technologies that explore cryptic gene clusters, pathways, interspecies crosstalk, and high-throughput fermentation enable the discovery of novel natural products. The potential impact of these technologies on drug productivity and on the distribution patterns of drug-productive families is yet to be revealed.

1 March 2013 in Current Medicinal Chemistry
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
XLXin Liu
Xin Liu
FZFeng Zhu
Feng Zhu
XMX. H. Ma
X. H. Ma
ZSZ. Shi
Z. Shi
SYS. Y. Yang
S. Y. Yang
YCYuzong Chen
Yuzong Chen
Prediction of polypharmacology of known drugs and new molecules against selected multiple targets is highly useful for finding new therapeutic applications of existing drugs (drug repositioning) and for discovering multi-target drugs with improved therapeutic efficacies by collective regulations of primary therapeutic targets, compensatory signalling and drug resistance mechanisms. In this review, we describe recent progresses in exploration of in-silico methods for predicting polypharmacology of known drugs and new molecules by means of structure-based (molecular docking, binding- site structural similarity, receptor-based pharmacophore searching), expression-based (expression profile/signature similarity disease-drug and drug-drug networks), ligand-based (similarity searching, side-effect similarity, QSAR, machine learning), and fragment-based approaches that have shown promising potential in facilitating drug repositioning and the discovery of multi-target drugs.

11 July 2012 in PLOS ONE
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
FZFeng Zhu
Feng Zhu
XMXiao Hua Ma
Xiao Hua Ma
CQChu Qin
Chu Qin
LTLin Tao
Lin Tao
XLXin Liu
Xin Liu
YJYuyang Jiang
Yuyang Jiang
Due to extensive bioprospecting efforts of the past and technology factors, there have been questions about drug discovery prospect from untapped species. We analyzed recent trends of approved drugs derived from previously untapped species, which show no sign of untapped drug-productive species being near extinction and suggest high probability of deriving new drugs from new species in existing drug-productive species families and clusters. Case histories of recently approved drugs reveal useful strategies for deriving new drugs from the scaffolds and pharmacophores of the natural product leads of these untapped species. New technologies such as cryptic gene-cluster exploration may generate novel natural products with highly anticipated potential impact on drug discovery.

17 November 2025 in Nucleic Acids Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
YZYintao Zhang
Yintao Zhang
YZYing Zhou
Ying Zhou
HXHangwei Xu
Hangwei Xu
WJWanghao Jiang
Wanghao Jiang
BLBo Li
Bo Li
YCYuzong Chen
Yuzong Chen
Development of targeted therapeutics begins with the discovery and validation of therapeutic targets, which builds the foundation for rational drug design. Extensive information on target–disease associations, target perturbation profiles, drug bioactivity landscapes, and clinical profiles is critical for identifying disease-relevant targets, elucidating their biological functions, and assessing the therapeutic potential. Therapeutic target database 2026 represents a major update that expands multiple layers of data essential for drug discovery. Key expansions include (i) 306 247 target–disease associations covering 2912 targets, (ii) 10 506 perturbation profiles triggered by genetic modification or chemical interference on 2368 targets, (iii) multidimensional activity landscapes of 17 806 drugs, encompassing cytotoxic, antimicrobial-, and molecular-level activities, and (iv) abundant clinical profiles for 2234 approved drugs. As a result, this update provides expanded and curated information on 3798 targets and 40 398 drugs. To enhance usability and scalability, the database framework has been rebuilt, which can be freely accessible without any login requirement at https://idrblab.org/ttd/.

1 October 2012 in Current Medicinal Chemistry
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
XMX. H. Ma
X. H. Ma
FZFeng Zhu
Feng Zhu
XLXin Liu
Xin Liu
ZSZ. Shi
Z. Shi
JZJ. X. Zhang
J. X. Zhang
YCYuzong Chen
Yuzong Chen
Virtual screening methods have been developed and explored as useful tools for searching drug lead compounds from chemical libraries, including large libraries that have become publically available. In this review, we discussed the new developments in exploring virtual screening methods for enhanced performance in searching large chemical libraries, their applications in screening libraries of ~ 1 million or more compounds in the last five years, the difficulties in their applications, and the strategies for further improving these methods.