Yi Lu

Dr. Yi Lu

Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

26Years (2001-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
8 August 2010 in Nature Neuroscience
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
KLKai Liu
Kai Liu
Yi LuYi Lu
Yi Lu
JLJae K Lee
Jae K Lee
RSRamsey Samara
Ramsey Samara
RWRafer Willenberg
Rafer Willenberg
ZHZhigang He
Zhigang He
The kinase mTOR functions to enhance cell growth in many systems. This study finds that injury reduces mTOR activity in neurons of the corticospinal tract (CST) and that enhancing mTOR activity by inactivation of its negative regulator PTEN substantially increases sprouting and regenerative growth of injured CST neurons. Despite the essential role of the corticospinal tract (CST) in controlling voluntary movements, successful regeneration of large numbers of injured CST axons beyond a spinal cord lesion has never been achieved. We found that PTEN/mTOR are critical for controlling the regenerative capacity of mouse corticospinal neurons. After development, the regrowth potential of CST axons was lost and this was accompanied by a downregulation of mTOR activity in corticospinal neurons. Axonal injury further diminished neuronal mTOR activity in these neurons. Forced upregulation of mTOR activity in corticospinal neurons by conditional deletion of Pten, a negative regulator of mTOR, enhanced compensatory sprouting of uninjured CST axons and enabled successful regeneration of a cohort of injured CST axons past a spinal cord lesion. Furthermore, these regenerating CST axons possessed the ability to reform synapses in spinal segments distal to the injury. Thus, modulating neuronal intrinsic PTEN/mTOR activity represents a potential therapeutic strategy for promoting axon regeneration and functional repair after adult spinal cord injury.

1 July 2018 in Cell
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
BCBo Chen
Bo Chen
YLYi Li
Yi Li
BYBin Yu
Bin Yu
ZZZicong Zhang
Zicong Zhang
BBBenedikt Brommer
Benedikt Brommer
ZHZhigang He
Zhigang He

1 August 2014 in Current Opinion in Neurobiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Yi LuYi Lu
Yi Lu
Stephane BELINStephane BELIN
Stephane BELIN
ZHZhigang He
Zhigang He


1 March 2015 in World Neurosurgery
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Yi LuYi Lu
Yi Lu
CYCecil Yeung
Cecil Yeung
ARAlireza Radmanesh
Alireza Radmanesh
RWRobert Wiemann
Robert Wiemann
PBPeter M. Black
Peter M. Black
AGAlexandra J. Golby
Alexandra J. Golby

25 March 2024 in Global Spine Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
Michael FehlingsMichael Fehlings
Michael Fehlings
LTLindsay A. Tetreault
Lindsay A. Tetreault
LHLaureen Hachem
Laureen Hachem
NENathan Evaniew
Nathan Evaniew
MGMario Ganau
Mario Ganau
BKBrian K. Kwon
Brian K. Kwon
Study Design: Clinical practice guideline development. Objectives: Acute spinal cord injury (SCI) can result in devastating motor, sensory, and autonomic impairment; loss of independence; and reduced quality of life. Preclinical evidence suggests that early decompression of the spinal cord may help to limit secondary injury, reduce damage to the neural tissue, and improve functional outcomes. Emerging evidence indicates that “early” surgical decompression completed within 24 hours of injury also improves neurological recovery in patients with acute SCI. The objective of this clinical practice guideline (CPG) is to update the 2017 recommendations on the timing of surgical decompression and to evaluate the evidence with respect to ultra-early surgery (in particular, but not limited to, <12 hours after acute SCI). Methods: A multidisciplinary, international, guideline development group (GDG) was formed that consisted of spine surgeons, neurologists, critical care specialists, emergency medicine doctors, physical medicine and rehabilitation professionals, as well as individuals living with SCI. A systematic review was conducted based on accepted methodological standards to evaluate the impact of early (within 24 hours of acute SCI) or ultra-early (in particular, but not limited to, within 12 hours of acute SCI) surgery on neurological recovery, functional outcomes, administrative outcomes, safety, and cost-effectiveness. The GRADE approach was used to rate the overall strength of evidence across studies for each primary outcome. Using the “evidence-to-recommendation” framework, recommendations were then developed that considered the balance of benefits and harms, financial impact, patient values, acceptability, and feasibility. The guideline was internally appraised using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE) II tool. Results: The GDG recommended that early surgery (≤24 hours after injury) be offered as the preferred option for adult patients with acute SCI regardless of level. This recommendation was based on moderate evidence suggesting that patients were 2 times more likely to recover by ≥ 2 ASIA Impairment Score (AIS) grades at 6 months (RR: 2.76, 95% CI 1.60 to 4.98) and 12 months (RR: 1.95, 95% CI 1.26 to 3.18) if they were decompressed within 24 hours compared to after 24 hours. Furthermore, patients undergoing early surgery improved by an additional 4.50 (95% 1.70 to 7.29) points on the ASIA Motor Score compared to patients undergoing surgery after 24 hours post-injury. The GDG also agreed that a recommendation for ultra-early surgery could not be made on the basis of the current evidence because of the small sample sizes, variable definitions of what constituted ultra-early in the literature, and the inconsistency of the evidence. Conclusions: It is recommended that patients with an acute SCI, regardless of level, undergo surgery within 24 hours after injury when medically feasible. Future research is required to determine the differential effectiveness of early surgery in different subpopulations and the impact of ultra-early surgery on neurological recovery. Moreover, further work is required to define what constitutes effective spinal cord decompression and to individualize care. It is also recognized that a concerted international effort will be required to translate these recommendations into policy.