There are no definitive criteria for identifying which patients with The International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage IB cervical cancer will benefit from adjuvant therapy after radical hysterectomy. The aims of this study were to clarify the efficacy of adjuvant therapy and assess complications after radical hysterectomy in patients with FIGO stage IB1 cervical cancer with intermediate risk factors. Between January 2005 and December 2009, the medical records of 75 stage IB1 patients’ intermediate risk factors (i.e., tumor size 2–4 cm, lymphovascular involvement, and/or deep stromal invasion >1/2) who underwent radical hysterectomy at six institutions were collected, and these patients were enrolled in this nonrandomized retrospective study. We simplified the criteria of intermediate risk factors as much as possible, as the criteria adopted in some clinical studies are complicated in practice. The patients were grouped according to the receipt of adjuvant therapy as follows: 46 patients, no further treatment; 19 patients, external beam radiation treatment, including 9 patients who received brachytherapy; 5 patients, concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT); and 5 patients, chemotherapy (CT). The clinical outcomes and complications in each group were analyzed. After an average follow-up of 82.6 months (range, 24–135 months), only one patient with all three risk factors who received radiotherapy (RT) experienced recurrence. Excluding this patient, the remaining patients who received RT, CCRT, or CT had two or three risk factors. Lymphedema was significantly more common among patients who received RT or CCRT, whereas the incidence of ileus and ureteral obstruction was not different among the treatment groups. However, an unsutured peritoneum increased the risk of ileus. The findings of this study suggest that RT and CCRT after radical hysterectomy are not beneficial in patients with intermediate risk factors. In particular, RT and CCRT appeared to increase the incidence of lymphedema. A prospective randomized study is needed to verify the findings of this study.
We aimed to establish correlations for the levels of follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), estrone (E1) and estradiol (E2) between urine and serum in premenopausal and postmenopausal women using immunoassays. In this study of 92 women (61 postmenopausal, 31 premenopausal), both urine and blood specimens were collected on the same day and stored at 4 °C for analysis by chemiluminescent immunoassay, radioimmunoassay and/or electrochemiluminescent immunoassay. There were correlations in the levels of FSH, E1 and E2 between urine and serum in both postmenopausal (r = 0.96 for FSH, r = 0.91 for E1, r = 0.80 for E2) and premenopausal (r = 0.98 for FSH, r = 0.92 for E1, r = 0.90 for E2) women. It is indicated that the correlations were stronger in the premenopausal group compared with the postmenopausal group, especially for FSH. The levels of FSH, E1 and E2 in urine correlated with those in the serum in premenopausal and postmenopausal women. Urine samples could be used instead of serum samples to measure hormone levels, which would reduce the difficulty of conducting large survey studies.
Endometriosis-associated ovarian malignancies have been well documented. Although these malignancies also occur as extraovarian lesions, little is known about them. Thus, this literature review aimed to further explore these rarely experienced tumors. A total of 257 published cases between April 1990 and April 2020 were found using PubMed, and 212 cases were included in the analysis considering Sampson’s criteria and the history of endometriosis. We classified these cases as follows: intestine, abdominal scar, vagina and vulva, peritoneum and deep endometriosis, urinary tract, uterine cervix, and others. Age of patients, history of endometriosis, types of past hormonal therapy, symptoms, histological types, and treatment were identified. The most common tumor site was the intestine. Endometrioid carcinoma was the dominant histological type. Contrary to the ovary, clear cell carcinoma was rare in extraovarian sites. On the other hand, clear cell carcinoma represented the largest number of abdominal scars. This difference may help us to understand the development of endometriosis-related malignancies. Hormonal treatment was mentioned in 67 cases and estrogen replacement therapy in 33 cases. Although risks of estrogen therapy are still controversial, the highly differentiated histological types and hormone-dependent characteristics of endometriosis-associated malignancy should be considered. Physicians should be careful about estrogen monotherapy after hysterectomy and long-term hormone replacement therapy in patients with a history of endometriosis.
6 January 2026 in Reproductive Medicine and Biology
Purpose: This study examined whether the incidence of retained products of conception (RPOC) differs between hormone replacement cycles (HRC) and natural ovulation cycles (NC) in frozen–thawed embryo transfer (FET) pregnancies. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 425 clinical pregnancies following FET at a single center from 2017 to 2021. Pregnancies were classified as HRC ( n = 204) or NC ( n = 221). The primary outcome was RPOC incidence, diagnosed by ultrasound, Doppler, and histopathology when available. Management approaches and perinatal outcomes were descriptively assessed. Exact tests and Firth's penalized logistic regression were applied given the small number of events. Results: RPOC occurred in 14/425 pregnancies (3.3%), with 11/204 (5.4%) in HRC and 3/221 (1.4%) in NC. The Cochran–Mantel–Haenszel odds ratio was 4.47 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.29–16.39), and the adjusted Firth odds ratio was 3.92 (95% CI 1.18–12.96). Among RPOC cases, 5 were managed conservatively, 8 required uterine evacuation, and 1 required uterine artery embolization; histopathological confirmation was obtained in 7 cases. No significant associations were observed with embryo‐transfer–related procedures. Conclusion: HRC was associated with a higher RPOC incidence than NC. These exploratory findings suggest potential protocol‐related differences in placental separation and warrant validation in larger, prospective multicenter studies.
About Me
Research Field ; Reproductive Medicine, Epidemiological Research
Qualifications ; MD, PhD
Research Field ; Reproductive Medicine, Epidemiological Research
Qualifications ; MD, PhD