Antonio Crego

Dr. Antonio Crego

Pontifical University of Salamanca
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

24Years (2003-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 February 2016 in Journal of Dental Education
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Antonio CregoAntonio Crego
Antonio Crego
MCMaría Carrillo-Diaz
María Carrillo-Diaz
JAJason M. Armfield
Jason M. Armfield
MRMartín Romero
Martín Romero

1 February 2010 in European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
RSRené Schalk
René Schalk
MVMarc van Veldhoven
Marc van Veldhoven
ALAnnet H. de Lange
Annet H. de Lange
HWHans De Witte
Hans De Witte
KKKatrin Kraus
Katrin Kraus
HZHannes Zacher
Hannes Zacher
This paper summarizes the state of affairs of European research on ageing and work. After a close inspection of the age construct, an overview is presented of research in four areas: the relationship between age and HR-policies, early retirement, age and performance/employability, age and health/well-being. The overview results in a research agenda on work and ageing and in recommendations for practice.

13 December 2021 in Psychology and Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Jose Ramon Yela BernabeJose Ramon Yela Bernabe
Jose Ramon Yela Bernabe
Antonio CregoAntonio Crego
Antonio Crego
JBJosé Buz
José Buz
ESElena Sánchez‐Zaballos
Elena Sánchez‐Zaballos
María Ángeles Gómez-MartínezMaría Ángeles Gómez-Martínez
María Ángeles Gómez-Martínez

24 January 2020 in Journal of Clinical Psychology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Jose Ramon Yela BernabeJose Ramon Yela Bernabe
Jose Ramon Yela Bernabe
Antonio CregoAntonio Crego
Antonio Crego
María Ángeles Gómez-MartínezMaría Ángeles Gómez-Martínez
María Ángeles Gómez-Martínez
LJLaura Jiménez
Laura Jiménez

1 January 2014 in Frontiers in Public Health
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Antonio CregoAntonio Crego
Antonio Crego
MCMaría Carrillo-Díaz
María Carrillo-Díaz
JAJason M. Armfield
Jason M. Armfield
MRMartín Romero
Martín Romero
Dental fear is a widely experienced problem. Through a 'vicious cycle dynamic', fear of dental treatment, lower use of dental services, and oral health diseases reinforce each other. Research on the antecedents of dental anxiety could help to break this cycle, providing useful knowledge to design effective community programs aimed at preventing dental fear and its oral health-related consequences. In this regard, frameworks that analyse the interplay between cognitive and psychosocial determinants of fear, such as the Cognitive Vulnerability Model, are promising. The onset of dental fear often occurs in childhood, so focusing on the child population could greatly contribute to understanding dental fear mechanisms and prevent this problem extending into adulthood. Not only can public mental health contribute to population health, but community dentistry programs can help to prevent dental fear. Regular dental visits seem to act in a prophylactic way, with dental professionals playing an important role in the regulation of the patients' anxiety-related responses. Both public mental health and community dentistry could therefore benefit from a multidisciplinary approach to dental fear and oral health.

15 January 2019 in Journal of Attention Disorders
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Pablo Riesco-MatíasPablo Riesco-Matías
Pablo Riesco-Matías
Jose Ramon Yela BernabeJose Ramon Yela Bernabe
Jose Ramon Yela Bernabe
Antonio CregoAntonio Crego
Antonio Crego
ESElena Sánchez-Zaballos
Elena Sánchez-Zaballos
Objective: We reviewed previously published meta-analyses of neurofeedback applied to children with ADHD and conducted a new meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that updates previous results and incorporates methodological modifications. Method: Searches were carried out through PubMed, Sage, PsycINFO, SpringerLink, and Psicodoc. We used Hedges’ (adjusted) g and a random-effects model. To assess heterogeneity, Q and I2 were calculated. We performed different analyses depending on the control groups, ADHD symptoms, pre- and/or posttreament data used and symptom evaluator. Results: We reviewed seven meta-analyses, and 17 studies were incorporated into the meta-analysis. RCTs support the efficacy of neurofeedback applied to ADHD when most proximal evaluators assess symptoms. Neurofeedback significantly improves inattention symptoms when possibly blinded evaluators assess symptoms. The preliminary results suggest that stimulant medication is more effective than neurofeedback. Conclusion: New RCTs that establish links between ADHD symptom measurements, subjects’ learning after neurofeedback, and neurophysiological measures could improve the quality of the conclusions.