Adel Asadi

Dr. Adel Asadi

Civil and Environmental Engineering, Tufts University, Medford, Massachusetts, USA
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

10Years (2017-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications

2 January 2024 in Georisk: Assessment and Management of Risk for Engineered Systems and Geohazards
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Adel AsadiAdel Asadi
Adel Asadi
LBLaurie Gaskins Baise
Laurie Gaskins Baise
SCSnehamoy Chatterjee
Snehamoy Chatterjee
MKMagaly Koch
Magaly Koch
BMBabak Moaveni
Babak Moaveni

4 February 2024 in Natural Hazards
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Adel AsadiAdel Asadi
Adel Asadi
LBLaurie G. Baise
Laurie G. Baise
MKMagaly Koch
Magaly Koch
BMBabak Moaveni
Babak Moaveni
SCSnehamoy Chatterjee
Snehamoy Chatterjee
YAYusupujiang Aimaiti
Yusupujiang Aimaiti

25 January 2024 in Seismological Research Letters
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Adel AsadiAdel Asadi
Adel Asadi
CSChristina Sanon
Christina Sanon
ECElife Cakir
Elife Cakir
WZWeiwei Zhan
Weiwei Zhan
HSHooman Shirzadi
Hooman Shirzadi
Babak MoaveniBabak Moaveni
Babak Moaveni
A global geospatial liquefaction model (GGLM‐2017) was previously developed (Zhu et al., 2017) using logistic regression (LR) and is currently used by the U.S. Geological Survey as the preferred liquefaction model to map liquefaction probability immediately after the occurrence of earthquake events. This research proposes an ensemble modeling approach to improve the performance of the GGLM‐2017 for geospatial liquefaction modeling of the 2023 Türkiye earthquakes using an updated inventory of liquefaction occurrence locations in Europe (the OpenLIQ database, which includes prior events occurring in Türkiye) and a new inventory from the 2023 Türkiye earthquakes (gathered from multiple sources). Using the same geospatial proxies for soil saturation, soil density, and earthquake loading, and the same non‐liquefaction sampling strategy used to develop GGLM‐2017, the proposed ensemble method is validated on the data of the 2023 Türkiye earthquakes by integrating four models, including global (GGLM‐2017), continental (LR model trained on eight European events), regional (LR model trained on three historical events in Türkiye), and event‐specific (LR model trained on partially available data from the 2023 Türkiye earthquakes) models. The inventory from the 2023 Türkiye earthquakes is split into two batches, in which the first batch (163 liquefaction occurrences) resulted from the preliminary reconnaissance and is used for training the event‐specific model, and the second batch (284 liquefaction occurrences) resulted from a more complete reconnaissance (which was made available later) and is used for validating all models. The rationale for using the first batch for training the event‐specific model is to exploit the information as they become available to optimize the performance of global model in liquefaction prediction. The final ensemble probability assignment is done by averaging the probabilities derived by the four individual models, and a 50% threshold is used for classification accuracy evaluations. Comparative analysis of the ensemble model’s performance with the GGLM‐2017 showed improved predictive accuracy, resulting in higher liquefaction detection for the specific event under study (the 2023 Türkiye earthquakes). The ensemble model also provides an estimate of model uncertainty.

9 October 2023 in Remote Sensing
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Adel AsadiAdel Asadi
Adel Asadi
LBLaurie Gaskins Baise
Laurie Gaskins Baise
CSChristina Sanon
Christina Sanon
Magaly KochMagaly Koch
Magaly Koch
SCSnehamoy Chatterjee
Snehamoy Chatterjee
Babak MoaveniBabak Moaveni
Babak Moaveni
Soil liquefaction often occurs as a secondary hazard during earthquakes and can lead to significant structural and infrastructure damage. Liquefaction is most often documented through field reconnaissance and recorded as point locations. Complete liquefaction inventories across the impacted area are rare but valuable for developing empirical liquefaction prediction models. Remote sensing analysis can be used to rapidly produce the full spatial extent of liquefaction ejecta after an event to inform and supplement field investigations. Visually labeling liquefaction ejecta from remotely sensed imagery is time-consuming and prone to human error and inconsistency. This study uses a partially labeled liquefaction inventory created from visual annotations by experts and proposes a pixel-based approach to detecting unlabeled liquefaction using advanced machine learning and image processing techniques, and to generating an augmented inventory of liquefaction ejecta with high spatial completeness. The proposed methodology is applied to aerial imagery taken from the 2011 Christchurch earthquake and considers the available partial liquefaction labels as high-certainty liquefaction features. This study consists of two specific comparative analyses. (1) To tackle the limited availability of labeled data and their spatial incompleteness, a semi-supervised self-training classification via Linear Discriminant Analysis is presented, and the performance of the semi-supervised learning approach is compared with supervised learning classification. (2) A post-event aerial image with RGB (red-green-blue) channels is used to extract color transformation bands, statistical indices, texture components, and dimensionality reduction outputs, and performances of the classification model with different combinations of selected features from these four groups are compared. Building footprints are also used as the only non-imagery geospatial information to improve classification accuracy by masking out building roofs from the classification process. To prepare the multi-class labeled data, regions of interest (ROIs) were drawn to collect samples of seven land cover and land use classes. The labeled samples of liquefaction were also clustered into two groups (dark and light) using the Fuzzy C-Means clustering algorithm to split the liquefaction pixels into two classes. A comparison of the generated maps with fully and manually labeled liquefaction data showed that the proposed semi-supervised method performs best when selected high-ranked features of the two groups of statistical indices (gradient weight and sum of the band squares) and dimensionality reduction outputs (first and second principal components) are used. It also outperforms supervised learning and can better augment the liquefaction labels across the image in terms of spatial completeness.

12 June 2024 in Geosciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Adel AsadiAdel Asadi
Adel Asadi
SCSnehamoy Chatterjee
Snehamoy Chatterjee
Multiple-point geostatistics (MPS) is an established tool for the uncertainty quantification of Earth systems modeling, particularly when dealing with the complexity and heterogeneity of geological data. This study presents a novel pixel-based MPS method for modeling spatial data using advanced machine-learning algorithms. Pixel-based multiple-point simulation implies the sequential modeling of individual points on the simulation grid, one at a time, by borrowing spatial information from the training image and honoring the conditioning data points. The developed methodology is based on the mapping of the training image patterns database using the t-Distributed Stochastic Neighbor Embedding (t-SNE) algorithm for dimensionality reduction, and the clustering of patterns by applying the Density-based Spatial Clustering of Applications with Noise (DBSCAN) algorithm, as an efficient unsupervised classification technique. For the automation, optimization, and input parameter tuning, multiple stages are implemented, including entropy-based determination of the template size and a k-nearest neighbors search for clustering parameter selection, to ensure the proposed method does not require the user’s interference. The proposed model is validated using synthetic two- and three-dimensional datasets, both for conditional and unconditional simulations, and runtime information is provided. Finally, the method is applied to a case study gold mine for stochastic orebody modeling. To demonstrate the computational efficiency and accuracy of the proposed method, a two-dimensional training image with 101 by 101 pixels is simulated for 100 conditional realizations in 453 s (~4.5 s per realization) using only 361 hard data points (~3.5% of the simulation grid), and the resulting average simulation has a good visual match and only an 11.8% pixel-wise mismatch with the training image.