Adrián Regos

Dr. Adrián Regos

Centre Tecnològic Forestal de Catalunya, Solsona, Spain
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

14Years (2013-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
20 November 2020 in Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
LKLuke T. Kelly
Luke T. Kelly
KGKatherine M. Giljohann
Katherine M. Giljohann
ADAndrea Duane
Andrea Duane
NANúria Aquilué
Núria Aquilué
SASally Archibald
Sally Archibald
LBLluís Brotons
Lluís Brotons
Fire's growing impacts on ecosystems: Fire has played a prominent role in the evolution of biodiversity and is a natural factor shaping many ecological communities. However, the incidence of fire has been exacerbated by human activity, and this is now affecting ecosystems and habitats that have never been fire prone or fire adapted. Kelly et al. review how such changes are already threatening species with extinction and transforming terrestrial ecosystems and discuss the trends causing changes in fire regimes. They also consider actions that could be taken by conservationists and policy-makers to help sustain biodiversity in a time of changing fire activity. Science , this issue p. eabb0355

7 March 2016 in Global Change Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
NTNicolas Titeux
Nicolas Titeux
Klaus HenleKlaus Henle
Klaus Henle
JMJean‐Baptiste Mihoub
Jean‐Baptiste Mihoub
Adrián RegosAdrián Regos
Adrián Regos
IGIlse R. Geijzendorffer
Ilse R. Geijzendorffer
LBLluís Brotons
Lluís Brotons

3 May 2022 in Global Ecology and Biogeography
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
GLGrant D. Linley
Grant D. Linley
CJChris J. Jolly
Chris J. Jolly
TDTim S. Doherty
Tim S. Doherty
WGWilliam L. Geary
William L. Geary
DADolors Armenteras
Dolors Armenteras
DNDale G. Nimmo
Dale G. Nimmo
Background: ‘Megafire’ is an emerging concept commonly used to describe fires that are extreme in terms of size, behaviour, and/or impacts, but the term’s meaning remains ambiguous.Approach: We sought to resolve ambiguity surrounding the meaning of ‘megafire’ by conducting a structured review of the use and definition of the term in several languages in the peer‐reviewed scientific literature. We collated definitions and descriptions of megafire and identified criteria frequently invoked to define megafire. We recorded the size and location of megafires and mapped them to reveal global variation in the size of fires described as megafires.Results: We identified 109 studies that define the term ‘megafire’ or identify a megafire, with the term first appearing in the peer‐reviewed literature in 2005. Seventy‐one (~65%) of these studies attempted to describe or define the term. There was considerable variability in the criteria used to define megafire, although definitions of megafire based on fire size were most common. Megafire size thresholds varied geographically from > 100–100,000 ha, with fires > 10,000 ha the most common size threshold (41%, 18/44 studies). Definitions of megafire were most common from studies led by authors from North America (52%, 37/71). We recorded 137 instances from 84 studies where fires were reported as megafires, the vast majority (94%, 129/137) of which exceed 10,000 ha in size. Megafires occurred in a range of biomes, but were most frequently described in forested biomes (112/137, 82%), and usually described single ignition fires (59% 81/137).Conclusion: As Earth’s climate and ecosystems change, it is important that scientists can communicate trends in the occurrence of larger and more extreme fires with clarity. To overcome ambiguity, we suggest a definition of megafire as fires > 10,000 ha arising from single or multiple related ignition events. We introduce two additional terms – gigafire (> 100,000 ha) and terafire (> 1,000,000 ha) – for fires of an even larger scale than megafires.

12 March 2019 in Scientific Reports
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Adrián RegosAdrián Regos
Adrián Regos
LGLaura Gagne
Laura Gagne
DADomingo Alcaraz-Segura
Domingo Alcaraz-Segura
JHJoão Honrado
João Honrado
Jesús DomínguezJesús Domínguez
Jesús Domínguez
The ability of ecological niche models (ENMs) to produce robust predictions for different time frames (i.e. temporal transferability) may be hindered by a lack of ecologically relevant predictors. Model performance may also be affected by species traits, which may reflect different responses to processes controlling species distribution. In this study, we tested four primary hypotheses involving the role of species traits and environmental predictors in ENM performance and transferability. We compared the predictive accuracy of ENMs based upon (1) climate, (2) land-use/cover (LULC) and (3) ecosystem functional attributes (EFAs), and (4) the combination of these factors for 27 bird species within and beyond the time frame of model calibration. The combination of these factors significantly increased both model performance and transferability, highlighting the need to integrate climate, LULC and EFAs to improve biodiversity projections. However, the overall model transferability was low (being only acceptable for less than 25% of species), even under a hierarchical modelling approach, which calls for great caution in the use of ENMs to predict bird distributions under global change scenarios. Our findings also indicate that positive effects of species traits on predictive accuracy within model calibration are not necessarily translated into higher temporal transferability.

20 December 2014 in Regional Environmental Change
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Adrián RegosAdrián Regos
Adrián Regos
Jesús DomínguezJesús Domínguez
Jesús Domínguez
AGAsunción Gil-Tena
Asunción Gil-Tena
LBLluís Brotons
Lluís Brotons
MNMiquel Ninyerola
Miquel Ninyerola
Xavier PonsXavier Pons
Xavier Pons

15 March 2025 in Communications Earth & Environment
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
IMI. Oliveras Menor
I. Oliveras Menor
NPN. Prat-Guitart
N. Prat-Guitart
GSG. L. Spadoni
G. L. Spadoni
AHA. Hsu
A. Hsu
Paulo FernandesPaulo Fernandes
Paulo Fernandes
DADolors Armenteras
Dolors Armenteras
Altered fire regimes are a global challenge, increasingly exacerbated by climate change, which modifies fire weather and prolongs fire seasons. These changing conditions heighten the vulnerability of ecosystems and human populations to the impacts of wildfires on the environment, society, and the economy. The rapid pace of these changes exposes significant gaps in knowledge, tools, technology, and governance structures needed to adopt informed, holistic approaches to fire management that address both current and future challenges. Integrated Fire Management is an approach that combines fire prevention, response, and recovery while integrating ecological, socio-economic, and cultural factors into management strategies. However, Integrated Fire Management remains highly context-dependent, encompassing a wide array of fire management practices with varying degrees of ecological and societal integration. This review explores Integrated Fire Management as both an adaptation and mitigation strategy for altered fire regimes. It provides an overview of the progress and challenges associated with implementing Integrated Fire Management across different regions worldwide. The review also proposes five core objectives and outlines a roadmap of incremental steps for advancing Integrated Fire Management as a strategy to adapt to ongoing and future changes in fire regimes, thereby maximizing its potential to benefit both people and nature.