Background: It has been reported that the occurrence of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) in oncological patients treated with immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) may be associated with favorable clinical outcome. We reported the clinical correlation between irAEs and the efficacy of ICIs in a real-world cohort of metastatic renal cell cancer (mRCC) patients. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated 43 patients with mRCC who were treated with nivolumab or with nivolumab plus ipilimumab. We considered seven specific classes of irAEs including pulmonary, hepatic, gastrointestinal, cutaneous, endocrine, rheumatological, and renal manifestations. We assessed progression-free survival (PFS) of specific irAEs classes compared to the no-irAEs group. Results: Twenty-nine out of 43 patients (67.4%) experienced a total of 49 irAEs registered. The most frequent irAE was thyroid dysfunction (n = 14). The median PFS after the beginning of therapy was significantly longer in patients with thyroid dysfunction and cutaneous reactions. In multivariate analysis, thyroid dysfunction was an independent factor for favorable outcome [HR: 0.29 (95% CI 0.11–0.77) p = 0.013]. Moreover, experiencing ≥2 irAEs in the same patient correlated in multivariate analysis with better outcome compared with none/one irAE [HR: 0.33 (95% CI 0.13–0.84) p = 0.020]. Conclusions: This retrospective study suggests an association between specific irAES (thyroid dysfunction and skin reaction) and efficacy of ICIs in metastatic RCC. Notably, multiple irAEs in a single patient were associated with better tumor response.

Background: Immune-related adverse events (irAEs) are inflammatory side effects, which can occur during immune-checkpoint(s) inhibitors (ICIs) therapy. Steroids are the first-line agents to manage irAEs because of their immunosuppressive properties. However, it is still debated whether or when steroids can be administered without abrogating the therapeutic efforts of immunotherapy. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated 146 patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), melanoma and renal cell carcinoma (RCC) treated with ICIs. We assessed the progression-free survival (PFS) of patients treated with steroids due to an irAE compared to a no-steroid group. Results: The early treatment with steroid (within the first 30 days from the beginning of immunotherapy) was not related to a shorter PFS (p = 0.077). Interestingly, patients who were treated with steroids after 30 days from the start of immunotherapy had significantly longer PFS (p = 0.017). In a multivariate analysis, treatment with steroids after 30 days was an independent prognostic factor for PFS (HR: 0.59 [95% CI 0.36–0.97], p = 0.037). Conclusions: This retrospective study points out that early systemic steroids administration to manage irAEs might not have a detrimental effect on patient clinical outcome in NSCLC, melanoma and RCC patients.

We previously showed that metabolomics predicts relapse in early breast cancer (eBC) patients, unselected by age. This study aims to identify a “metabolic signature” that differentiates eBC from advanced breast cancer (aBC) patients, and to investigate its potential prognostic role in an elderly population. Serum samples from elderly breast cancer (BC) patients enrolled in 3 onco-geriatric trials, were retrospectively analyzed via proton nuclear magnetic resonance (1H NMR) spectroscopy. Three nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectra were acquired for each serum sample: NOESY1D, CPMG, Diffusion-edited. Random Forest (RF) models to predict BC relapse were built on NMR spectra, and resulting RF risk scores were evaluated by Kaplan–Meier curves. Serum samples from 140 eBC patients and 27 aBC were retrieved. In the eBC cohort, median age was 76 years; 77% of patients had luminal, 10% HER2-positive and 13% triple negative (TN) BC. Forty-two percent of patients had tumors >2 cm, 43% had positive axillary nodes. Using NOESY1D spectra, the RF classifier discriminated free-from-recurrence eBC from aBC with sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of 81%, 67% and 70% respectively. We tested the NOESY1D spectra of each eBC patient on the RF models already calculated. We found that patients classified as "high risk" had higher risk of disease recurrence (hazard ratio (HR) 3.42, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.58–7.37) than patients at low-risk. This analysis suggests that a “metabolic signature”, identified employing NMR fingerprinting, is able to predict the risk of disease recurrence in elderly patients with eBC independently from standard clinicopathological features.

Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a rare neuroendocrine malignancy of the skin characterized by high aggressiveness. Four main factors are implicated in its development: immunosuppression, ultraviolet radiation, age and the Merkel cell polyomavirus (MCPyV). In recent years, immune checkpoint inhibitors have shown clinical activity in MCC treatment. We report the case of an 82-year-old man with a lung adenocarcinoma diagnosis, who underwent immunotherapy with nivolumab as second-line treatment. Seven months after the diagnosis of lung cancer during the nivolumab treatment, the patient developed an eyelid MCC, initially misdiagnosed as a chalazion. A palliative radiotherapy was performed with clinical benefit. After a total of seven cycles of nivolumab, computed tomography showed a lung and cerebral disease progression. In addition, clinical conditions worsened leading to the patient’s death 13 months after the initial lung cancer diagnosis. Cases of co-occurrence of MCC and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) have rarely been reported. Interestingly, common risk factors may be postulated for both cancers. Considering the rarity of this adverse event, its short-term temporal relation with the administration of the drug, which makes a relation improbable, and the coexistence of other risk factors, which may provide plausible explanations, it is possible to conclude according to the WHO Adverse Reaction Terminology that a causal relation between the occurrence of this serious adverse event and the exposure to the drug is unlikely. However, the case deserves to be reported in the literature.

E23518 Background: In patients with GIST, literature reports a risk of second primary tumors between 4.5% and 33% with different distribution in the worldwide. The network of 7 italian EURACAN centers has collected clinical and molecular features of GIST patients with second primary tumors. Methods: We reviewed the clinical characteristics of 201 patients with GIST and second primary tumors in order to evaluate association between risk of dead and each possible factor, using Kaplan meier curve, log-rank test and Cox model for Hazard Ratio and it’s interval Confidence 95% estimation. Furthermore, NGS analysis ( 56 gene onco panel) in 72 patients with GIST was performed. Results: On the basis of the significant correlation previously observed between the Miettinen risk criteria of GIST (low/very low) and the incidence of second primary tumors (gastrointestinal tumors),P < 0.001 (Abstr 11032 ASCO 2019), we observed in these patients a median age of diagnosis of GIST of 68, with prevalent gastric site localization ( KIT exon 11 mutation), NF1 and Lynch (kit/pdgfra WT) syndromes in the low risk subgroup. The more frequent site of second epithelial tumor in gastrointestinal tract was the colon followed by gastric, pancreatic and biliary tract. In patients with GIST with low-very low risk according Miettinen classification, after a median follow-up period of 25 years, we have observed that the gastroenteric site of second tumors occurrence is significantly related to the survival (p < .0003). In the NGS analysis of the GIST we observed the pathogenetic somatic mutations in the following genes: BRCA 2 (p.Thr2125fs), but germline test negative, TP53 (p.Arg192*,p.Gly244Ser,p.His168Leu), RET (p.Lys120Asn, p.His168Leu, p.Thr930Met ), NRAS (p.Gly134Asp), CTNNB1 (p.Ser45Phe), MSH6 (P.Ala164Val), SMARCB1 (p.Arg192), VHL (p.Gly93Val), PTEN(p.Val158Ile, p.Asn323fs), STK1I (p.Arg40Cys), SMO (p.Glu194Lys), EGFR (p.Gly721Asp), ATM (p.Asp2708Asn), ERBB4 (p.Asn181Ile). Conclusions: In our analysis patients with GIST (low-very low classes according to Miettinen) have significant risk to death because of second primary tumors in gastrointestinal tract. Specific attention to gastrointestinal screening during the follow-up of GIST (low and very low risk) is required.

11032 Background: GISTs are the most common mesenchymal tumors of the digestive tract. As of recent, new links are being made between GISTS and secondary malignancies. However, whether the coexistence of GISTs with other tumors is stochastic, or the result of related pathogenetic mechanisms is still unknown. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed clinical and molecular features from all GIST patients with second tumors treated in seven Italian GIST reference centers. Qualitative variables were compared using the Fisher exact test. Results: Clinical data of 184 patients with diagnosis of GIST were evaluated. Median age at diagnosis was 66 years, KIT exon 11 resulted the most frequent mutation (73%) while seven patients (3.8%) had a genetic syndrome. The most common primary GIST localizations were stomach (54%) and small intestine (33%). Second tumors arose mostly from gastrointestinal and genitourinary tract. Fourtythree patients had two primary tumors other than GIST and five patients had three other primary malignancies. According to Miettinen criteria, 45% of non-metastatic patients at diagnosis belong to low or very low-risk classes. We highlighted a significant correlation (P=0.002) between risk class and second/third tumor localization, with considerably high percentage of GI second malignancies in low/very low risk GISTs (table). Conclusions: The high frequency of second/third tumors reported in low and very low GIST calls for a careful follow-up also in these patients. Furthermore, this population requires further genetic investigation, NGS analysis is ongoing. [Table: see text]