Anderson Kavir Osorio Delgado

Mr. Anderson Kavir Osorio Delgado

MASTER'S DEGREE IN COMPUTER AND SYSTEMS ENGINEERING - Universidad Nacional de Colombia
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

7Years (2020-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
28 August 2020 in Agriengineering
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Anderson Kavir Osorio DelgadoAnderson Kavir Osorio Delgado
Anderson Kavir Osorio Delgado
ALAndres Esteban Puerto Lara
Andres Esteban Puerto Lara
Cesar PedrazaCesar Pedraza
Cesar Pedraza
DJDavid Jamaica
David Jamaica
LRLeonardo Rodríguez
Leonardo Rodríguez
Weed management is one of the most important aspects of crop productivity; knowing the amount and the locations of weeds has been a problem that experts have faced for several decades. This paper presents three methods for weed estimation based on deep learning image processing in lettuce crops, and we compared them to visual estimations by experts. One method is based on support vector machines (SVM) using histograms of oriented gradients (HOG) as feature descriptor. The second method was based in YOLOV3 (you only look once V3), taking advantage of its robust architecture for object detection, and the third one was based on Mask R-CNN (region based convolutional neural network) in order to get an instance segmentation for each individual. These methods were complemented with a NDVI index (normalized difference vegetation index) as a background subtractor for removing non photosynthetic objects. According to chosen metrics, the machine and deep learning methods had F1-scores of 88%, 94%, and 94% respectively, regarding to crop detection. Subsequently, detected crops were turned into a binary mask and mixed with the NDVI background subtractor in order to detect weed in an indirect way. Once the weed image was obtained, the coverage percentage of weed was calculated by classical image processing methods. Finally, these performances were compared with the estimations of a set from weed experts through a Bland–Altman plot, intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) and Dunn’s test to obtain statistical measurements between every estimation (machine-human); we found that these methods improve accuracy on weed coverage estimation and minimize subjectivity in human-estimated data.