As the destructive impacts of both human-made and natural disasters on societies and built environments are predicted to increase in the future, innovative disaster management strategies to cope with emergency conditions are becoming more crucial. After a disaster, selecting the most critical post-disaster reconstruction projects among available projects is a challenging decision due to resource constraints. There is strong evidence that the success of many post-disaster reconstruction projects is compromised by inappropriate decisions when choosing the most critical projects. Therefore, this study presents an integrated approach based on four multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) techniques, namely, TOPSIS, ELECTRE III, VIKOR, and PROMETHEE, to aid decision makers in prioritizing post-disaster projects. Furthermore, an aggregation approach (linear assignment) is used to generate the final ranking vector since various methods may provide different outcomes. In the first stage, 21 criteria were determined based on sustainability. To validate the performance of the proposed approach, the obtained results were compared to the results of an artificial neural network (ANN) algorithm, which was applied to predict the projects’ success rates. A case study was used to assess the application of the proposed model. The obtained results show that in the selected case, the most critical criteria in post-disaster project selection are quality, robustness, and customer satisfaction. The findings of this study can contribute to the growing body of knowledge about disaster management strategies and have implications for key stakeholders involved in post-disaster reconstruction projects. Furthermore, this study provides valuable information for national decision makers in countries that have limited experience with disasters and where the destructive consequences of disasters on the built environment are increasing.