Translational science has been introduced as the nexus among the scientific and the clinical field, which allows researchers to provide and demonstrate that the evidence-based research can connect the gaps present between basic and clinical levels. This type of research has played a major role in the field of cardiovascular diseases, where the main objective has been to identify and transfer potential treatments identified at preclinical stages into clinical practice. This transfer has been enhanced by the intromission of digital health solutions into both basic research and clinical scenarios. This review aimed to identify and summarize the most important translational advances in the last years in the cardiovascular field together with the potential challenges that still remain in basic research, clinical scenarios, and regulatory agencies.

Background: Atrial Fibrillation (AF) treatment strategies are suboptimal and clinical predictors of success are limited. Artificial Intelligence (AI) has arisen as a powerful tool for treatment efficacy prediction. Objective: We developed an AI‐driven platform for the stratification of patients based on noninvasive Electrocardiographic Imaging (ECGI) biomarkers and clinical parameters to evaluate and predict optimal patient treatment. Methods: We evaluated 204 patients treated according to clinical guidelines and characterized them at the electrophysiological level using ECGI recordings during AF. ECGI signals were calculated to obtain frequency and rotational biomarkers. Baseline clinical characteristics and treatment after inclusion were registered. Results: A clustering algorithm was calibrated taking three different variables for 1 year outcome prediction: (1) AF type (paroxysmal or persistent); (2) ECGI complexity score (calculated based on highest dominant frequency, median dominant frequency, and mean rotor time); and (3) type of treatment: rhythm control (drugs, AF ablation) or rate control. The cluster analysis classified patients into five groups: Low electrophysiological complexity patterns were associated with an improved outcome after ablation, regardless of the time duration of the AF. Intermediate complexity scores in paroxysmal AF had a favourable outcome with rhythm control treatments, but not in persistent AF patients. Cluster patterns with higher electrophysiological complexity were associated with a higher probability of AF recurrence, both in paroxysmal and persistent groups. The performance of the algorithm predicting the outcome was (AUC: 0.73 (0.63–0.81)), increasing overall performance with respect to conventional persistent and paroxysmal classification (AUC: 0.58 (0.48–0.68); p < 0.05). This algorithm was evaluated on the 20% test set, obtaining 90% prediction success. Conclusions: AI‐driven analysis that combined clinical information with ECGI biomarkers increased the performance of conventional classification methods for AF treatment stratification.