The definition of sleep bruxism (SB) has changed over the years, and although it is no longer defined as a disorder, it is considered a risk factor that can result in prejudicial systemic and stomatognathic issues. The prevalence of SB in children is variable among studies, and its decrease during adolescence is a controversial matter among authors. We aimed to determine SB prevalence and assess its trend with age in a sample of pediatric patients who frequented the Lisbon Pediatric Dentistry Service. We conducted a retrospective observational study based on information provided by patients’ parents/caregivers and without examination or polysomnography examination. Data were collected between August 2019 and December 2020 by five dentists. A total of 1900 patients were included, 50.6% and 49.4% of which were male and female, respectively. Of the total sample, 334 (17.6%, 95% confidence interval of 15.9–19.4%) had bruxism, corresponding to 18.9% and 16.2% of male and female patients, respectively (p = 0.121). SB was reported in 20.7% of patients 0–6 years old, in 19.4% of those 7–11 years old, and in 14.6% of those 12–17 years old. In conclusion, SB showed a slightly higher prevalence among male pediatric patients, but further studies are needed to rule out confounding factors.

The coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic dramatically changed all aspects of life. In the context of clinical dental care, a significant number of new recommendations have been implemented to comply with public health policies, ensuring the safety of dental care professionals, staff, and patients and preventing further spread of the virus. This article is the third in a series of 3 on the management of COVID-19 in clinical dental care and presents a set of recommendations and standards to be implemented in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. These include remote contact with all patients for triage and guidance before scheduling a clinical visit to know if they have COVID symptoms or are positive for COVID, if they belong to a risk group, and if there is a suggestion that aerosol-generating procedures (AGPs) will be required during their visit. It also reviews additional precautionary measures in the waiting room and reception area, where the environment is reorganised to protect patients and clinical staff, avoiding situations that could result in cross contamination. The dental office operates under a strict set of guidelines, namely, use of personal protective equipment by professionals, contact with patients, a strategy to avoid aerosol-generating procedures, as well as disinfection procedures for the dental office before, during, and after each patient visit. The implementation of these protocols to mitigate cross infection and spread of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in the dental office will help improve safety and restore the confidence required to provide dental care to patients during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Introduction: Infrared thermography (IRT) is a non-invasive, non-ionizing imaging modality capable of rapidly capturing surface temperature variation. In dentistry, particularly orthodontics and TMD evaluation, IRT may serve as a valuable complementary tool to be added in conventional diagnostic protocols. Objective: Correlate possible relationships between thermographic findings of orofacial structures and cephalometric landmarks. Methods: An infrared imaging camera, FLIR^® i7, was used to record the regions of interest, correspondent to the temporal, masseter and orbicular oris muscles, in adolescents (n = 22). Bilateral temperature differences were considered as thermal asymmetries with a conventional threshold of 0.3 °C to distinguish an eventual hyperactivity or hyperfunctions of detrimental structures. The Trevisi cephalometric parameters that were taken into consideration for the study were SNA, SNB, ANB, OccltoSn, Wits relation to base and Molar/canine classes. Results: Most of the participants showed a normal temperature difference ΔΤ for the upper and lower orbicular oris muscle, right vs. left, 96% and 92%, respectively. The other ROIs presented a mixed pattern of thermal asymmetries; however, no statistically significant differences were found when crossed with the cephalometric landmarks. Conclusions: Asymmetrical patterns of infrared thermography can aid on the diagnosis and treatment plan of an orthodontic appointment, since the actual stability of pos-orthodontic treatment is highly dependent on the muscular activity of the tongue and lips, in particular when the patient has atypical swallowing. Our findings suggest that this technique can be used to quantify anatomical landmarks relevant to craniofacial morphology in specific populations, particularly at ages where muscular functional activity is strongly correlated with dentoskeletal development.