Andrea Visentin

Dr. Andrea Visentin

School of Computer Science & IT, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

11Years (2016-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
29 January 2023 in Forecasting
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
KMKate Murray
Kate Murray
Andrea RossiAndrea Rossi
Andrea Rossi
DCDiego Carraro
Diego Carraro
AVAndrea Visentin
Andrea Visentin
Traders and investors are interested in accurately predicting cryptocurrency prices to increase returns and minimize risk. However, due to their uncertainty, volatility, and dynamism, forecasting crypto prices is a challenging time series analysis task. Researchers have proposed predictors based on statistical, machine learning (ML), and deep learning (DL) approaches, but the literature is limited. Indeed, it is narrow because it focuses on predicting only the prices of the few most famous cryptos. In addition, it is scattered because it compares different models on different cryptos inconsistently, and it lacks generality because solutions are overly complex and hard to reproduce in practice. The main goal of this paper is to provide a comparison framework that overcomes these limitations. We use this framework to run extensive experiments where we compare the performances of widely used statistical, ML, and DL approaches in the literature for predicting the price of five popular cryptocurrencies, i.e., XRP, Bitcoin (BTC), Litecoin (LTC), Ethereum (ETH), and Monero (XMR). To the best of our knowledge, we are also the first to propose using the temporal fusion transformer (TFT) on this task. Moreover, we extend our investigation to hybrid models and ensembles to assess whether combining single models boosts prediction accuracy. Our evaluation shows that DL approaches are the best predictors, particularly the LSTM, and this is consistently true across all the cryptos examined. LSTM reaches an average RMSE of 0.0222 and MAE of 0.0173, respectively, 2.7% and 1.7% better than the second-best model. To ensure reproducibility and stimulate future research contribution, we share the dataset and the code of the experiments.

12 June 2025 in Energies
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
COCiaran O'Connor
Ciaran O'Connor
MBMohamed Bahloul
Mohamed Bahloul
Steven PrestwichSteven Prestwich
Steven Prestwich
AVAndrea Visentin
Andrea Visentin
Electricity price forecasting plays a fundamental role in ensuring efficient market operation and informed decision making. With the growing integration of renewable energy, prices have become more volatile and difficult to predict, increasing the necessity of accurate forecasting in bidding, scheduling, and risk management. This paper provides a comprehensive review of point forecasting models for electricity markets, covering classical statistical approaches both with and without exogenous inputs, and modern machine learning and deep learning techniques, including ensemble methods and hybrid architectures. Unlike standard reviews focused solely on the day-ahead market, we assess model performance across day-ahead, intra-day, and balancing markets, with each posing unique challenges due to differences in time resolution, data availability, and market structure. Through this market-specific lens, the paper merges insights from a broad set of studies; identifies persistent challenges, such as data quality, model interpretability, and generalisability; and outlines promising directions for future research. Our findings highlight the strong performance of hybrid and ensemble models in the day-ahead market, the dominance of recurrent neural networks in the intra-day market, and the relative effectiveness of simpler statistical models such as LEAR in the balancing market, where volatility and data sparsity remain critical challenges.

25 February 2025 in Cluster Computing
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Andrea RossiAndrea Rossi
Andrea Rossi
AVAndrea Visentin
Andrea Visentin
DCDiego Carraro
Diego Carraro
Steven PrestwichSteven Prestwich
Steven Prestwich
KBKenneth Brown
Kenneth Brown
Accurately forecasting workload demand in cloud computing environments is essential for optimizing resource allocation, minimizing costs, and ensuring reliable service quality. As cloud computing scales to meet the needs of diverse applications - from AI and machine learning to data-intensive analytics - predictive models play a critical role in dynamically managing multiple resources. Traditional models provide limited guidance for decision-makers since they are typically univariate models, ignoring the prediction of the interplay between multiple resources, and do not account for the uncertainty of their predictions, preventing resource management from acting promptly according to such uncertainty to ensure specific target service level requirements. To address these limitations, we introduce univariate and bivariate Bayesian deep learning models that predict future workload demand of one and multiple resources respectively, while quantifying the uncertainty of their predictions. In particular, our approach leverages Hybrid Bayesian Neural Networks and probabilistic Long Short-Term Memory models, enhanced with architecture modifications to handle complex, multivariate cloud workload patterns. Moreover, we investigate fine-tuning-based transfer learning methods to enhance their adaptability in real-world cloud scenarios where new data centres with different workload characteristics operate. We validate our models on extensive datasets from Google and Alibaba cloud clusters. Results show that modelling the uncertainty of predictions positively impacts performance, especially on service level metrics, because uncertainty quantification can be tailored to desired target service levels that are critical in cloud applications. Moreover, transfer learning benefits performance in scenarios where models are built on data from the same provider.

4 August 2025 in Energy and AI
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
COCiaran O’COnnor
Ciaran O’COnnor
MBMohamed Bahloul
Mohamed Bahloul
RRRoberto Rossi
Roberto Rossi
SPSteven Prestwich
Steven Prestwich
AVAndrea Visentin
Andrea Visentin

12 June 2024 in Energy Strategy Reviews
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
COCiaran O’cOnnor
Ciaran O’cOnnor
JCJoseph Collins
Joseph Collins
SPSteven Prestwich
Steven Prestwich
AVAndrea Visentin
Andrea Visentin

1 October 2021 in European Journal of Operational Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
AVAndrea Visentin
Andrea Visentin
Steven PrestwichSteven Prestwich
Steven Prestwich
RRRoberto Rossi
Roberto Rossi
STS. Armagan Tarim
S. Armagan Tarim